Plain simple:
my $home_library = Koka::Libraries->find( {branchcode => $item->homebranch} );
This patch replaces 'Koka' by 'Koha'.
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
(cherry picked from commit 3dee550e34)
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
After looking at Marcel's comments, the problem is in our matching
to hold_fill_targets - rather than adjusting to find filled/waiting holds we
could ensure that hold_fill_targets only refers to the specific hold it
is intended to
This patch is clearer, if slightly less performant than last (we now return all
the reserves and have to find the 'highest')
Test Plan:
1 - Create and use a patron that can place multiple record level holds per record
2 - Create a record with X items, each at a different library
3 - Place X 'Next available' holds on the record for the patron using the 'Holds to place' box
4 - perl misc/cronjobs/holds/build_holdsqueue.pl
5 - Check in LibraryA's copy as LibraryA and confirm the hold
6 - Revisit request.pl for the record, notice the next hold in line is now item-specific
7 - Checkout the item to the patron, notice the remaining hold is marked waiting
8 - Attempt to place another hold for your patron, notice that it requires an item-specific hold
8 - Apply this patch
9 - Repeat steps 1-5
10 - Revisit request.pl for the record, notice the next hold in line has *not* become item-specific
11 - Checkout the item to the patron, ensure the first hold is filled and the second remains record level
12 - Repeat whole test plan without building holds queue to confirm holds are still treated correctly
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
(cherry picked from commit 0bfe336c7b)
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
Inside of ItemsAnyAvailableAndNotRestricted was no effect from main set
of smart rules (per record and other limits): i.e. call to
"CanItemBeReserved" was absent totally.
Because of this there was a bug: for example none of two items were
allowed to be held when first was allowed by one smart rule, BUT on loan,
and second was disallowed by another smart rule (for example,
0 "Holds per record"),
i.e. in this case both items unavailable: so on-shelf holds setting
"allow hold if all unavailable" should allow to hold first one, and not
the second one. But it was that both wasn't allowed to be held.
Solution: call to sub "CanItemBeReserved" added so it checked for
"...->{status} ne 'OK'" so now if item restricted by smart rule it also
accounted as "unavailable" and "AnyAvailavble" not counts it.
How to reproduce:
1. Add 2 smart rules (/cgi-bin/koha/admin/smart-rules.pl) with "on shelf
holds": "if all unavailable" for all rules, no "item level holds", and
set "holds per record" to 2 for "books" and "0" for "computer files".
2. Create only 2 items for one biblio, but different types, "book"
and "computer file". For example in misc4dev env:
/cgi-bin/koha/cataloguing/additem.pl?biblionumber=1#additem
3. Check out that item of type "book" to some person, for example,
in misc4dev:
/cgi-bin/koha/circ/circulation.pl?borrowernumber=2&barcode=3999900000001
4. Open reserve/request, for example, for item 1 and patron 1 in misc4dev
env (/cgi-bin/koha/reserve/request.pl?biblionumber=1&borrowernumber=1)
5. It does not allow to hold, both red crossed, but computer file says
"Exceeded max holds per record" because of "0" limit set on step 1.
6. Apply the patch.
7. Reload page on step 5 and see that "book" will be available for hold,
but "computer file" still will be red-crossed "Exceeded max holds
per record", now that's correct because both items unavailable:
one because on load, another because of "0" limit for computer files.
8. Check-in book from step 3 so it will be returned to the library,
9. Reload page on step 5 and see that again no any holds available,
but it's now also correct: "book" now returned but "on shelf holds"
set to "if all unavailable".
Signed-off-by: Agustin Moyano <agustinmoyano@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
(cherry picked from commit 4599fcc59d)
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
Add cut-off shortcut (return from inside the loop) when first
"Any Available And Not Restricted" item found, because one is
enough for "Any".
Testing: no change visible for code behavior/results,
it is just faster because won't loop over the whole set.
Signed-off-by: Agustin Moyano <agustinmoyano@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
(cherry picked from commit 720b69780c)
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
Naming mistake came because this sub is used to detect if anything
available for hold, but it used in "if ANY UNAVAILABLE rule", so actually
results of this sub negated (see below "return" in the code).
In details:
when previous refactor was done, name for subroutine was chosen
wrongly in "opposite" direction from what it actually does:
it was named "ItemsAnyAvailableForHold", but this subroutine gave
truth (1) if at least one of the items available on shelf, not lost,
not on loan, not held, and not restricted by smart rules and damaged
status. So, if this sub says that item is still "available", this
actually PREVENTS item from hold in parent sub (see negated return):
sub IsAvailableForItemLevelRequest {
...
my $any_available = ItemsAnyAvailableAndNotRestricted...
return $any_available ? 0 : 1;
# ^^^ if any available and not restricted - we don't allow
# on-shelf holds
...
I.e. like it named now: "ItemsAnyAvailableAndNotRestricted".
Small aside fix: white space for '&&' inside brackets added to join
operation by priority visually.
Testing plan not needed: all places where sub used it just renamed.
More: all this places/code was introduced in one older commit so there
is also no overlaps or other calls/uses for this subroutine.
Signed-off-by: Agustin Moyano <agustinmoyano@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
(cherry picked from commit 618cf80df9)
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
To make sure we will update all the objects in one go (and no trigger
the ->set->store from Koha::Object->update)
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
(cherry picked from commit 4b299f54aa)
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
(cherry picked from commit 6f6f88105d)
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
We are using raw SQL statements, we should use Koha::Hold instead.
This patch does not seem optimal, we would like to increment priority in
only 1 statement and without the need to fetch and loop all holds.
== Test plan ==
- apply patch
- place some holds on the same record
- check that the priorities look good
- mark one hold as waiting by doing a check-in
- revert the waiting status
- confirm that the priorities are recalculated correctly
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
(cherry picked from commit 563a25d952)
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
To test:
1 - Find or create a record with 10 items
2 - Set sysprefs:
decreaseLoanHighHolds - enable
decreaseLoanHighHoldsDuration - 2
decreaseLoanHighHoldsValue - 2
decreaseLoanHighHoldsControl - 'over the number of holdable items'/dynamic
3 - Set circ rules to allow 1 hold per record on the relevant record
4 - Place 3 holds on the record
5 - Check one item in and confirm hold to set to waiting
6 - Issue to the patron with the waiting hold
7 - Get a notice that loan period is decreased
8 - Don't confirm the checkout
9 - Apply patch
10 - Restart all the things
11 - Repeat checkout, no decrease this time!
Signed-off-by: Christopher Brannon <cbrannon@cdalibrary.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
(cherry picked from commit 96a8710350)
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Sally <sally.healey@cheshiresharedservices.gov.uk>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
(cherry picked from commit 326c0159a0)
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
This is a companion/alternative to bug 25184, in that it allows an
explicit workflow for placing returned books into temporary storage for
a few days for decontamination purposes.
The idea here is to create a specific notforloan value for "In
Decontamination" or something along along those lines. This notforloan
value would never be trappable. At the end of decon,
UpdateNotForLoanStatusOnCheckin could be used to remove the
notforloan status and allow checkins to be trapped to fill holds.
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Restart all the things!
3) Give an item a negative notforloan value
4) Place a hold on the item
5) Check the item in
6) Note the item is trapped for hold
7) Set SkipHoldTrapOnNotForLoanValue to the same notforloan value
you used in step 3
8) Check the item in again
9) Note Koha did not ask you to trap the item for hold!
Signed-off-by: Sally <sally.healey@cheshiresharedservices.gov.uk>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
(cherry picked from commit 465e5562fc)
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
To make sure we are going to display the correct hold's info we need to
pass the reserve_id.
== Test plan ==
1. Add some content to HOLD_SLIP notice, e.g.
<h2>[% branch.branchname %]</h2>
<div>[% biblio.author %]<br>[% biblio.title %]<br>[% item.barcode %]
<ul><li> Reserve ID: [% hold.reserve_id %]</li>
<li>Expiration date: [% hold.expirationdate %]</li></ul>
2. Add 2 holds for 1 patron to a single record
3. Check the reserve IDs in the reserves table - on a clean sandbox, they will be 1 and 2
4. Check in one of the items from the record and print the slip
5. Note that the reserve ID on the slip is 2 and the expiration date is blank
6. Repeated check ins do not change this
7. Check in a second item from the record
8. Note that the reserve ID for this hold is also 2, but this time the expiration date is filled in
9. Check in the first item again - the reserve ID stays as 2, but this time the expiration date is filled in
10. Apply patch
11. cancel the holds to come back to a clean state
(and maybe ensure items aren't in transit)
12. redo the test and see the following differences
13. 1st checkin:
1. expiration date ok
2. the reserve ID is the one of the first hold
14. 2nd checkin:
1. expiration date ok
2. the reserve ID is the one of the second hold
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
It's entirely possible that some libraries are relying on the current
before for part of their workflow. Do to this possibility, it seems like
a good idea to control this behavior via a system preference.
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch set
2) Run updatedatabase.pl
3) Set TrapHoldsOnOrder to "don't trap"
4) Set an item's notforloan value to -1
5) Place a hold on that item
6) Check in the item
7) Note the item is not trapped for hold
9) Set TrapHoldsOnOrder to "trap"
10) Check in the item
11) Koha should now ask if you'd like to trap the item for the hold!
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Negative notforloan statuses should allow holds to be placed but not captured.
Due to coronavirus, we have libraries setting all returned materials to a negative notforloan value of Quarantine for several days.
They're using UpdateNotForLoanStatusOnCheckin to set that status automatically. However, those items are still capturing for holds,
even though those items cannot be checked out until the notforloan status is removed.
In cases like an On Order item where we do want the hold to fill at checkin,
UpdateNotForLoanStatusOnCheckin should be used to clear that notforloan status so the hold can fill.
In master, if I set an item to a not for loan but holdable status ( < 0 ) I can place the hold,
capture the hold and set it to waiting, but *not* check it out to the patron!
This does not make sense. I should not be able to trap an item for checkout unless it can be checked out.
Test Plan:
1) Set an item's notforloan value to -1
2) Place a hold on that item
3) Check in the item
4) Trap the item for that hold
5) Attempt to check the item out to the patron, you will be unable to
because it is notforloan
6) Apply this patch
7) Restart all the things!
8) Repeat steps 1-3
9) The screen should no longer ask if the item should be trapped
to fill the hold!
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Catherine Ingram <Catherine.Ingram@cedarparktexas.gov>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch fixes 2 other occurrences. The first one is in POD of
AddReserve, the other one fixes SIP code
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch adds a clause in ModReserveAffect to check if there
are existing transfers and close them when setting a hold to waiting
To test:
1 - Set AutomaticItemReturn to Do
2 - Checkin an item from Library B at Library A
3 - Confirm item is in transfer (check the details page)
4 - Place a item level hold for pickup at library A
5 - Checkin the item at Library A
6 - Confirm the hold
7 - View the details page
8 - Note the item is in transit and waiting
9 - Apply patch
10 - Delete hold and repeat
11 - Confirm that transfer is closed when hold marked waiting
Signed-off-by: Sally <sally.healey@cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk>
Signed-off-by: Stina Hallin <stina.hallin@ub.lu.se>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
It seems like ModReserveFill and ModReserveAffect should both produce action logs for holds.
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Place a hold
3) Check in the item to trap the hold
4) Check out the item to fill the hold
5) Check the action logs for that reserve id
6) Note the new logs!
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
When "reserve/request.pl -> C4/Reserves.pm::IsAvailableForItemLevelRequest" called many times with hundred of items and "on shelf holds" parameter set to "If all unavailable" for these items + patron, it goes slow.
It happens because in subloop it is checking if all items available so it is O(n^2) and it re-checks each time the same info for each item with repeating DB/data requests.
Fix:
The inner loop 1:1 picked out into separate subroutine and called outside of the loop, saving data in 'items_any_available' variable once, this variable passed to IsAvailableForItemLevelRequest to be used inside as the precalculated result.
This made algorithm O(n) instead of O(n^2) so there is noticeable speed increase.
How to reproduce:
1) on freshly installed kohadevbox create/import one book,
remember that biblionumber for later use it in down below,
2) add 100 items for that book for some library,
3) find some patron, that patron's card number we will
use as a borrower down below to open holds page,
4) check for the rule or set up a single circulation rule
in admin "/cgi-bin/koha/admin/smart-rules.pl",
that rule should match above book items/library/patron,
check that rule to have a non-zero number of holds (total, daily, count) allowed,
and, IMPORTANT: set up "On shelf holds allowed" to "If all unavailable",
("item level holds" doesn't matter).
5) open "Home > Catalog > THAT_BOOK > Place a hold on THAT_BOOK" page
("holds" tab), and enter patron code in the search field,
or you can create a direct link by yourself, for example, in my case it was:
/cgi-bin/koha/reserve/request.pl?biblionumber=4&findborrower=23529000686353
6) it should be pretty long page generation time on old code, densely increasing for every hundred items added. In the case of this solution, it's fast, and time increases a little only, linear.
I tested on my computer in VirtualBox for page generation times,
did 3-5 runs for same case to check if results are stable, and got such values:
(old code):
100 items: 50 seconds
200 items: 3.2 minutes
300 items: 7.3 minutes
(version with fix):
100 items: 4.4 seconds
200 items: 7.5 seconds
300 items: 10.4 seconds
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This is just refactoring. extracting logically independent code
to separate sub + tests update. No logic change yet.
Searching for "any_available" item among all biblionumber items was done
inside of "elsif on_shelf_holds == 2", and it is logically very independent
piece of code (this "@items" loop), it needs just biblionumber and patron
as parameters so it can be extracted into separate subroutine, and
later also called/reused from somewhere else.
This ability to call from another place also made for future patch
to remove O(n^2) problem with nested loops.
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
`$on_shelf_holds` was assigned before "return .. if" but not used in that code piece,
so sometimes it was useless. Moved assignment after "return .. if".
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Since bug 21206, C4::Reserves::_get_itype is not longer used and should
be removed.
commit 31c29fd31f
Bug 21206: Replace C4::Items::GetItem
UPDATE: In the meanwhile another occurrence was added to Reserves.t, but
easy to replace
Test plan:
% git grep _get_itype
must not return any occurrences.
If one needs it, Koha::Item->effective_itemtype must be used instead.
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
To test:
1 - Place a hold for pickup at a different branch than you are signed in at on an item owned by current branch
2 - Check in the item
3 - Confirm the transfer
4 - Check the branchtransfers table and note the reason is 'Reserve'
5 - Set the preference CanMarkHoldsToPullAsLost to allow
6 - Place a hold on an item at branch you are singed in at
7 - Ensure you are not using strict sql modes (bug 22431)
8 - Go to Circulation->Holds to pull
9 - Mark hold as lost
10 - Check branchtransfers and confirm reason is "LostReserve"
11 - Check in item from step 1 at the correct branch
12 - Go to Circulation->Holds awaiting pickup
13 - Cancel the reserve
14 - Check branchtransfers and confirm reason is "CancelReserve"
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Currently when fixing priorities of existing holds, priorities aren't
fixed when checking out a middle priority hold because the hold has been
fulfilled and deleted. This patch adds a check for, if the hold can't be
found, an old hold with the required reserve_id.
To test:
1. Place at least four holds on a biblio for different borrowers
2. Check out an item to the 3rd priority borrower
3. Check the existing holds table for the biblio. The priorities might be
out of order, or try clicking the dropdowns and there might be an empty
dropdown option, or open the browser developer tools and notice the option
values in the select are missing value=3.
4. Apply patch and restart memcached
5. Check out an item to the 2nd priority borrower
6. Check the existing holds table for the biblio. Confirm the priorities
have been fixed and are now consecutive with no gaps.
Sponsored-by: Chartered Accountants Australia and New Zealand
Signed-off-by: Emmi Takkinen <emmi.takkinen@outlook.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch updates the emailLibrarianWhenHoldIsPlaced functionality to
use the inbound_email_address method to obtain the correct email address
for a branch.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
The number of parameters of AddReserve makes it hard to read and
maintain.
This patch replace it with a hashref, which will make the calls more
readable.
Moreover the bibitems has been removed as it was not used by the
subroutine.
Test plan:
- Make sure the tests pass
- Read the diff and search for typos
- Place a hold on few items
Note for QA: reservation_date and expiration_date do not match the DB column's names,
should we?
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch simply adds a test for itemnumber being defined in the
reserve before comparing it to silence the warning.
Test plan:
1) Prior to patch, run prove t/db_dependant/Circulation.t and note lots
of `Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at
/kohadevbox/koha/C4/Reserves.pm line 790` warnings.
2) Apply the patch, re-run the test and note the tests still pass but
the warnings are now gone.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Without this it is not possible to make for a specific patron category
or itemtype a more specific unlimited holds_per_day rule if you have a
catch all rule (categorycode = *, itemtype = *) with limited
holds_per_day value.
Signed-off-by: Minna Kivinen <minna.kivinen@hamk.fi>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
* CanItemBeReserved
Prior to "Bug 18936: Convert issuingrules fields to circulation_rules",
GetHoldRule returned holds_per_record even if no reservesallowed was
defined. This change restores this behavior.
FIXME Note: In GetHoldRule we return itemtype only if reservesallowed is set,
not sure it is correct.
* t/db_dependent/Holds/DisallowHoldIfItemsAvailable.t
When setting returnbranch, holdallowed and hold_fulfillment_policy, we
should not provide categorycode.
* t/db_dependent/Holds.t
Prefer to keep the existing rules instead of removing them. It got quite
hard to understand what was going on here because of the mixup with
the rule reservesallowed that was in issuingrules, and the other rules
we used for the tests. Also, categorycode should not be passed to set
those 3 rules (holdallowed, hold_fulfillment_policy and returnbranch)
* t/db_dependent/Circulation.t
Setting lengthunit to 'hours', no need to make sure the rule has been
correctly be saved
* t/db_dependent/Circulation/CalcDateDue.t
It uses hardcoded data that is not in the sample data (categorycode=C).
Let use K that exists and postpone a refactore of the whole script (to
make it create the data it needs).
* t/db_dependent/Circulation/ReturnClaims.t
* t/db_dependent/Circulation/IssuingRules/maxsuspensiondays.t
Simple replace Koha::IssuingRule with Koha::CirculationRules
* t/db_dependent/Koha/Charges/Fees.t
=> FIXME Still failing, stuck here, need help
Signed-off-by: Minna Kivinen <minna.kivinen@hamk.fi>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This necessitates moving the circ rules from using '*' to using
undef/NULL.
Signed-off-by: Minna Kivinen <minna.kivinen@hamk.fi>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
and remove 'scalar' keyword in calls where it's not needed.
Signed-off-by: Brendan Gallagher <brendan@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans Palsson <hans.palsson@hkr.se>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
With bug 24217 pushed, lot of warnings appears during the tests are run.
Most of them are "Use of uninitialized value in "
Test plan:
Take a look at the output of run 1049
https://jenkins.koha-community.org/job/Koha_Master_D9/1049/consoleFull
Most of the warnings from this run will be removed by this patch
At least 2 are not fixed:
Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at /kohadevbox/koha/C4/Reserves.pm line 791.
t/db_dependent/Items_DelItemCheck.t => see 23463
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch adds "patron's hold group" as a new option to Hold pickup library match
To test:
1. Set ReservesControlBranch preference to item.
2. Create a hold group
3. Go to circulation and fines rules
SUCCESS => in 'Hold pickup library match' there is a new option called "patron's hold group"
4. In a library not in hold group set 'Hold policy' to "any" and 'Hold pickup library match' to "patron's hold group"
5. Search for a user in the hold group
6. 'Search to hold' for items of the library of step 4
7. Select an item and 'Place hold for [user]'
SUCCESS => in 'Pickup at' you should see patron's hold group as options
8. In OPAC sign in as the same user of step 5
9. Search for the item in step 7
SUCCESS => in 'Pick up locations' you should see patron's hold group as options
10. Sign off
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Liz Rea <wizzyrea@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
* Bug 22284: (follow-up) Remove commented warn and address test failures
* Bug 22284: (follow-up) fix test count after merge
* Bug 22284: (follow-up) fixes after 15496
* Bug 22284: (follow-up) fixes after 18936
* Bug 22284: (follow-up) Remove HomeOrHolding from reserves
Signed-off-by: Liz Rea <wizzyrea@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch modifies C4::Reserves to control when hold group options where selected
in smart rules.
In CanItemBeReserved adds 2 new error status messages
1) branchNotInHoldGroup: when a patron's homebranch is not in item's hold group
2) pickupNotInHoldGroup: when a selected pickup location is not in item's hold group
Also CheckReserves is modified when item's priority is defined, to control by hold
group when required.
Finally, IsAvailableForItemLevelRequest was also modified to control by hold group when
required.
To test:
1) Apply this patch
2) prove t/db_dependent/Holds.t
SUCCESS => Result: PASS
3) Sign off
Sponsored-by: VOKAL
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Liz Rea <wizzyrea@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
We absolutely need that for modules.
We are enabling strict by using Modern::Perl.
Note that other modules from C4 use strict and warnings, instead of
Modern::Perl
Test plan: git grep 2505 **/*.pm should not return any results
And let's see later what needs to be fixed.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
To test:
1 - Checkout an item to a patron
2 - Make sure 'ReservesNeedReturn' is set to 'Automatically'
3 - Place an item level hold on the checked out item
4 - Note the hold is marked waiting
5 - Delete the hold
6 - Apply patch
7 - Place a new hold
8 - Hold is not marked waiting
9 - Please a hold on a different item
10 - Note it is marked waiting
11 - Test when item is damaged and hold not allowed on damaged items
12 - Test when item is in transit
13 - Test when item has another hold
14 - Only in the case where none of the above are true should the hold be marked waiting
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch restores the behavior prior to bug 21206.
If "Hold pickup library match" is "Not set", then
hold_fulfillment_policy equals an empty string.
Test plan:
1. Go to "Circulation and fines rules"
2. Under "Default checkout, hold and return policy", unset "Hold pickup
library match" and Save
3. Place a hold on one item for one patron
4. Try to checkout the same item with another patron
=> Without this patch you the checkout list do not show, and the logs
contain "The method Koha::Item-> is not covered by tests!"
=> With this patch applied you see the checkout list
QA will take care of comparing the statement with the one before bug 21206
and make sure they are equivalent
Signed-off-by: Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch updates all cases where debit_type_code was 'Res' to
'RESERVE' which is more informative and consistent with the new style
guidelines.
The patch also ensure all calls to add_debit with a type or 'reserve'
now pass the capitalised code instead.
Signed-off-by: Séverine QUEUNE <severine.queune@bulac.fr>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Test plan:
1. Place some holds
2. Go to the 'Holds' tab of the biblio record
3. Modify dates in the table and click on 'Update holds' button
4. Verify that dates have been correctly updated
Signed-off-by: Maryse Simard <maryse.simard@inlibro.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Blou
Nick Clemens
Andrew Nugged
Jonathan Druart
Kyle M Hall
Martin Renvoize
Aleisha Amohia
Joonas Kylmälä
Jesse Weaver
Julian Maurice
Agustin Moyano