This patch remove the private sub used in GetIssuingCharges in favor
of get_effective_rule
It corrects the wrong precedence for rules and adds tests to cover this
subroutine
NOTE: the 'branch' for the discount will be determined by the signed in branch,
this is a bug to be fixed in the future
To test:
1 - Define a rentalcharge for an itemtype
2 - Define a 10% discount for library A, category A, all itemtypes
3 - Define a 50% discount for all libraries, category A, same itemtype
4 - Attempt to checkout an item from library A of the matching itemtype
5 - The 50% discount is applied
6 - Apply patches
7 - Attempt to checkout an item from library A of the matching itemtype
8 - The 10% discount is applied
prove -v t/db_dependent/Circulation.t
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
(cherry picked from commit c055685ac4)
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
(cherry picked from commit 50ac537d92)
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Actually, the GetRecords service gives many information :
bibliographic data (marcxml field)
item data (items field)
issue data (issues field)
The issue data should not be sent by these service, its a privacy problem.
Biblio title and author are redundant.
This patch changes to use Koha::Checkouts to get issues informations with only the addition of item barcode.
Test plan :
1) Enable ILS-DI webservice
2) Checkout an item
3) Go to {opac}/cgi-bin/koha/ilsdi.pl?service=GetRecords&id={biblionumber}
4) Check the issues tag content
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
(cherry picked from commit 8ae0ef6eb5)
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
(cherry picked from commit b6d2ea13c7)
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Bug 19014 altered CanBookBeRenewed to return (auto_)too_soon over on_reserve
For cron purposes this is the correct behaviour.
For display purposes we wish to see on_reserve over too_soon
This patchset adds a switch to 'CanBookBeRenewed' to alter the priority of these statuses
To test:
1 - set NoRenewalBeforePrecision to date only
2 - set a circ rule to auto-renewal=yes, no renewal before=0, checkout period to 7 days
3 - check item out
4 - confirm item shows Scheduled For Automatic Renewal in issues table
5 - place a hold on the item for another patron
6 - reload issues table for patron 1, confirm checkout still shows "scheduled for automatic renewal" rather than "on hold"
7 - change No Renewal Before value to 7
8 - reload issues table for patron 1, confirm checkout now shows "on hold"
9 - Apply patch
10 - restart_all
11 - Reload the issues table - confirm 'on_hold' still shows
12 - Change No Renewal Before to 0
13 - Refresh issues table, still shows 'On hold'
14 - perl misc/cronjobs/automatic_renewals.pl -v
15 - Result shows 'auto_too_soon'
16 - prove -v t/db_dependent/Circulation.t
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
(cherry picked from commit ff08e99965)
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch simply passes skip_record_index calls to Koha:Item:store
for all the changes done in AddReturn.
Testing is really verifiying that items are still correctly indexed at the end
For both search engines
To test:
1 - Find or create a record with multipel items
2 - Populate both:
UpdateItemLocationOnCheckin
UpdateNotForLoanStatusOnCheckin
3 - Confirm that checking in an item correctly updates the item status in search results
4 - Test with items issued, and items not issued
5 - Test when generating a transfer (checkin at different branch)
6 - Test when item was marked lost
7 - Test when filling transfer
Signed-off-by: Séverine Queune <severine.queune@bulac.fr>
Signed-off-by: Christoper Brannon <cbrannon@cdalibrary.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Bug 26581: Unit tests
These tests cover the changes to ensure the AddReturn calls index_records once
per call and that other calls pass the skip_record_index parameter correctly
Signed-off-by: Séverine Queune <severine.queune@bulac.fr>
Signed-off-by: Christoper Brannon <cbrannon@cdalibrary.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
The lines to calc due date are doubled
ModDateLastSeen is not needed as we set the item not lost and we can set
the date as we do for date last borrowed and save a DB store
Largely this is reading the code and confirming the changes make sense
To test:
1 - Apply patch
2 - Check out items, confirm it works as before
3 - prove -v t/db_dependent/Circulation.t
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chrisc@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
(cherry picked from commit 6e37dcafee)
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
Staff can create smart rules with empty (undefined) fine grace period.
In Overdues.pm undefined firstremind means 0, do the same in Circulation.pm.
To test:
1. Apply these patches
2. Run:
kshell
prove t/db_dependent/Circulation.t
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chrisc@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
(cherry picked from commit 7e66d6d190)
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
When batch editing, 2 reindex calls are sent to ES/Zebra.
We can easily avoid that reusing the skip_modzebra_update (renamed skip_record_index)
Additionally we should only send one request for biblio, and we should
only do it if we succeed
As the whole batch mod is in a transaction it is possible to fail in which case
Zebra queue is reset, but ES indexes have already been set
In addition to the skip param this patchset moves Zebra and Elasticsearch calls to
Indexer modules and introduces a generic Koha::SearchEngine::Indexer so that we don't
need to check the engine when calling for index
The new index_records routine takes an array so that we can reduce the calls to
the ES server.
The index_records routine for Zebra loops over ModZebra to avoid affecting current behaviour
Test plan:
General tests, under both search engines:
1 - Add a biblio and confirm it is searchable
2 - Edit the biblio and confirm changes are searchable
3 - Add an item, confirm it is searchable
4 - Delete an item, confirm it is not searchable
5 - Delete a biblio, confirm it is not searchable
6 - Add an authority and confirm it is searchable
7 - Delete an authority and confirm it is not searchable
Batch mod tests, under both search engines
1 - Have a bib with several items, none marked 'not for loan'
2 - Do a staff search that returns this biblio
3 - Items show as available
4 - Click on title to go to details page
5 - Edit->Item in a batch
6 - Set the not for loan status for all items
7 - Repeat your search
8 - Items show as not for loan
9 - Test batch deleting items
a - Test with a list of items, not deleting bibs
b - Test with a list of items, deleting bibs if no items remain where all items are only item on a biblio:
SELECT MAX(barcode) FROM items GROUP BY biblionumber HAVING COUNT(barcode) IN (1)
c - Test with a list of items, deleting bibs if no items remain where some items are the only item on a biblio:
SELECT MAX(barcode) FROM items GROUP BY biblionumber HAVING COUNT(barcode) IN (1,2)
10 - Confirm records are update/deleted as appropriate
Signed-off-by: Bob Bennhoff <bbennhoff@clicweb.org>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Bug 25265: Rename skip_modzebra_update to skip_record_index
Signed-off-by: Bob Bennhoff <bbennhoff@clicweb.org>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Bug 25265: Fix copy paste error for parameter
Signed-off-by: Bob Bennhoff <bbennhoff@clicweb.org>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Bug 25265: (follow-up) Don't index malformed records
This is analogous to 26522, we shoudl skip record that cannot be retrieved for indexing
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Bug 25265: (QA follow-up) Add shebang to Indexer.t
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Bug 25265: (QA follow-up) Rename biblionumber in ModZebra, index_records
ModZebra:
The name is very misleading: we can index authid's too here.
And yes, it should not be in C4/Biblio too ;) A first step..
Adding the same change here in Koha/SearchEngine/Zebra/Indexer.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Bug 25265: (QA follow-up) Check server type in Elasticsearch::index_records
Doing the same change as previously (renaming biblionumber), but fixing
at the same the record fetch. If (theoretically) an authority is passed
without a record, it would have fetched a biblio record.
Test plan:
You need Elasticsearch here.
Replaced this line in AddAuthority:
$indexer->index_records( $authid, "specialUpdate", "authorityserver", $record );
by
$indexer->index_records( $authid, "specialUpdate", "authorityserver", undef );
And updated an authority record. Check if you can search for the change.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
Bug 26078: (follow-up) used validTransfer instead of checking WrongTransfer message
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
(cherry picked from commit d8f3e0ec0d)
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
To test:
- Have 2+ branches
- Set your default return policy to Item returns to issuing library
- Find an item with holding branch of Branch A
- Set your library to Branch B
- Check item in
- Koha generates a transfer to Branch A. In doing so, it sets the item holding branch to Branch B
- Set your library to Branch A
- Check item in
- Koha generate a transfer to Branch B. In doing so, it sets the item holding branch to Branch A
- Set you library to Branch A
- Check the item in
. . . Repeat indefinitely.
Apply patch
Repeat
No more loop
Signed-off-by: Sally <sally.healey@cheshiresharedservices.gov.uk>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
(cherry picked from commit 4767112320)
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
The original code assumed every codepath should be trated as a
successful check-in. Such is not the case and the regression tests
verify that the code acknowledges this.
To test:
1. Apply the regression tests patch
2. Run:
$ kshell
k$ prove t/db_dependent/Illrequests.t
=> FAIL: Tests fail
3. Apply this patch
4. Repeat 2
=> SUCCESS: Tests pass!
5. Sign off :-D
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
(cherry picked from commit f916269465)
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
I can not see how this code is useful here. It checks for a reserve with priority 0 and found = NULL
That is not a status that should occur when filling a transfer. Either the found is 'T' if we are transferring due
to the hold, or the hold was placed after the transfer was initiated, and so the priority is not 0
Additional, AddReturn checks for reserves later and asks the staff to confirm waiting status.
ModReserveStatus also calls CartToShelf regardless of what happens here.
To test:
1 - Set UpdateItemLocationOnCheckin to:
_ALL_: CART
2 - SetAutomaticItemReturn = Do
3 - Check an item in at a different branch than it's homebranch to create a transfer
4 - Check the item in at it's homebranch
5 - View the item details page
6 - Item is not in CART location
7 - Apply patch
8 - Repeat
9 - Item is in CART location after completion of transfer
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Robb <jrobb@sekls.org>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
(cherry picked from commit e025cd7643)
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch moves the accountline->store call below the FinesLog code
such that we return the same 'thing' from _FixOverduesOnReturn as the
other clauses of the routine.
We also take the oportunity to clean up the warning thrown by an errant
call to the routine such that we output the actual itemnumber rather
than a HASH reference marker.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
(cherry picked from commit dae82b191a)
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch removes any overdues which would be reversed on a backdated
return if CalcFineOnBackdate is enabled and the user has not already
attempted to pay off the accruing fine.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
(cherry picked from commit 3f3534a8ee)
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
To test:
1 - Find or create a record with 10 items
2 - Set sysprefs:
decreaseLoanHighHolds - enable
decreaseLoanHighHoldsDuration - 2
decreaseLoanHighHoldsValue - 2
decreaseLoanHighHoldsControl - 'over the number of holdable items'/dynamic
3 - Set circ rules to allow 1 hold per record on the relevant record
4 - Place 3 holds on the record
5 - Check one item in and confirm hold to set to waiting
6 - Issue to the patron with the waiting hold
7 - Get a notice that loan period is decreased
8 - Don't confirm the checkout
9 - Apply patch
10 - Restart all the things
11 - Repeat checkout, no decrease this time!
Signed-off-by: Christopher Brannon <cbrannon@cdalibrary.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
(cherry picked from commit 96a8710350)
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
As we are now removing them from MarkIssueReturned they should not be
removed from AddReturn as well.
Also I think this will fix a regression, if $doreturn is not set (in
case the item is withdrawn and BlockReturnOfWithdrawnItems or the item
is lost and BlockReturnOfLostItems, and other specific cases).
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
It's quite hard to know where this need to be fixed.
it can be either MarkIssueReturned or LostItem, depending on the
different cases we want to handle.
This patch picked MarkIssueReturned, but maybe the similar code in
AddReturn needs to be removed then.
== Test plan ==
1. Set MarkLostItemsAsReturned to 'from items tab of the catalog module'
2. Set AutoRemoveOverduesRestrictions to 'Do'
3. Set up an overdues restriction in the notice triggers
4. Check out an item and let the overdues process restrict the account
5. Navigate to the moredetail.pl page (items tab) for the overdue item
6. Mark the item lost
7. Return to the account in question - notice the item has been returned, but the restriction remains
8. Clean state: remove restriction + remove item lost status
9. Apply patch
10. Redo the test but this time in addition to the item being returned,
the restriction will be lifted.
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
To make sure we are going to display the correct hold's info we need to
pass the reserve_id.
== Test plan ==
1. Add some content to HOLD_SLIP notice, e.g.
<h2>[% branch.branchname %]</h2>
<div>[% biblio.author %]<br>[% biblio.title %]<br>[% item.barcode %]
<ul><li> Reserve ID: [% hold.reserve_id %]</li>
<li>Expiration date: [% hold.expirationdate %]</li></ul>
2. Add 2 holds for 1 patron to a single record
3. Check the reserve IDs in the reserves table - on a clean sandbox, they will be 1 and 2
4. Check in one of the items from the record and print the slip
5. Note that the reserve ID on the slip is 2 and the expiration date is blank
6. Repeated check ins do not change this
7. Check in a second item from the record
8. Note that the reserve ID for this hold is also 2, but this time the expiration date is filled in
9. Check in the first item again - the reserve ID stays as 2, but this time the expiration date is filled in
10. Apply patch
11. cancel the holds to come back to a clean state
(and maybe ensure items aren't in transit)
12. redo the test and see the following differences
13. 1st checkin:
1. expiration date ok
2. the reserve ID is the one of the first hold
14. 2nd checkin:
1. expiration date ok
2. the reserve ID is the one of the second hold
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
If think this case does not apply to real-life, but the logic needs to
be fixed.
If an item is due now, and AddReturn is called now with a return date in
the future, the issue is overdue and the patron must be debarred.
However it is not as we compare with now and not the return date
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Koha::Account->add_credit is expecting a positive amount.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Didier Gautheron <didier.gautheron@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Test plan:
1) Before the patch when one checks in something using the KOCT the last seen
date is not updated.
2) After the patch when one checks in something using the KOCT the last seen
date is updated.
Signed-off-by: Laurence Rault <laurence.rault@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
In Koha 18.11 backdating a return triggered a recalculation of the fine. This was removed in bug 14591, and I believe it was in error. The bug report itself has no justification for the change in behavior.
Test Plan:
1) Disable CalculateFinesOnReturn
2) Backdate an overdue with fines, note the fine does not change
3) Apply this patch
4) Repeat step 2
5) The fine should be updated!
Signed-off-by: Kelly McElligott <kelly@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
We should use Koha::DateUtils instead of Date::Time directly
This patch simplay replaces calls to now() with a call to dt_from_string()
which does effectively the same thing.
Probably reading the code and verifying changes is sufficient but...
To test:
1 - confirm the files all compile
2 - confirm all tests pass
3 - confirm Koha still works
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
In some tests we want to know if we are in a testing environment.
When run the usual way, our trick works, the perl interpreter matches 'prove':
$ENV{_} eq 'prove'
In other situations, we have the KOHA_NO_TABLE_LOCKS environment variables, for the SendCirculationAlert race conditions (see bug 15854 and bug 18364).
For unknown reasons, Jenkins runs the tests with /usr/bin/perl.
This patch suggests to rename KOHA_NO_TABLE_LOCKS and use KOHA_TESTING
instead, when prove is not used (or not correctly detected as it it the
case for Jenkins)
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
To test:
1 - Verify on staff side that patron can be edited to opt in our out of auto renewal
2 - Check out some items to a patron opted in to auto renewal
3 - Ensure the items are checked out and set to autorenew
4 - Login on the opac at the patron
5 - Verify items cannot be renewed as scheduled for auto-renewal
6 - On staff side, opt patron out of auto renewal
7 - Verify on opac items are no longer marked for auto renewal
8 - Run the auto renewal cron job, items are not renewed
9 - Set 'no renewal before' to a setting that would prevent renewal
10 - Verify that opting patron in or out of auto renewal changes only the reason items cannot be renewed
11 - Set 'no renewal before' to a setting that would allow for renewal
12 - Verify that opting patron in/out changes their ability to renew
13 - Verify that when opted out cron does not renew
14 - Verify that when opted in the item is auto renewed
15 - Reset the due date, opt out, verify manual renewal succeeds
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patchset moves all code to calculate the correct renewal branch into Koha::Item.pm
When interface is opac we follow the syspref, otherwise we use the current userenv, or pass through
a defined branch
To test:
1 - Check out an item to a patron
2 - Set allowed renewals in the circ rules to 100 (just so you can keep testing)
3 - Renew the item in staff interface, confirm it is recorded correctly in statistics table (as signed in branch)
4 - Renew via the opac, testing with each setting of OpacRenewalbranch
5 - prove -v t/db_dependent/Koha/Item.t
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
We do not need this subroutine, moving it where it is used.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Starting to replace the ModItem calls with Koha::Item->store
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch adds support for passing a trigger to
C4::Circulation::transferbook and passes 'RotatingCollection' to it when
called inside the rotating collections routine.
Test plan:
1/ Perform a rotating collection transfer operations
2/ Check the database for instances of 'RotatingCollection' in the
branchtransfers.reason field.
3/ Signoff
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch adds handling to catch transfers that may have been triggered
on item return.
Test Plan:
1) Enable AutomaticItemReturn and accompanying system preference
2) Return an item to the wrong branch and note the transfer
3) Check the database for the new trigger value
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
To test:
1 - Place a hold on an item
2 - Go to Circulation->Transfers
3 - Attempt to transfer item to a branch it is not expected at
4 - No warning
5 - Apply patches
6 - Repeate
7 - You get a notice that there is a hold and must deal with the hold (or ignore)
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Looks like the atomicupdate and sysprefs.sql changes were lost at some point.
Don't forget to run QA tools on your patches before submitting
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch updates a request's status to RET upon return
Sponsored-by: Loughborough University
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Some rebase issues, accounttype no longer exists, circ rules make
CanBookBeRenewed fail, so we mock that too
interface must be passed as a hashref
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
When the RenewAccruingItemWhenPaid syspref is enabled and all the fines
on an item that is accruing fines are paid, we automatically renew that
item to prevent it from starting to accrue fines again.
This patch adds an additional argument to C4::Circulation::AddRenewal
which allows us to skip the calculation of fines upon renewal, which we
don't want to do if the fines on that item have just been paid. Existing
calls to AddRenewal have not been amended because there seems to be a
convention of only passing undef when adding arguments that require
their positioning to be maintained. Since the new argument is the last
one, this is not the case with any existing call.
Sponsored-by: Loughborough University
Signed-off-by: Lucy Harrison <L.M.Harrison@lboro.ac.uk>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
To Test:
1) Place a hold on an item.
2) Check in the item to trigger the hold. Item is now listed as
waiting.
3) Set branch to a different library.
4) Check in the item to trigger the hold. Notice that nothing but a
local use is recorded.
5) Apply the patch.
6) Repeat steps 1-4. Notice that the hold is triggered around routed to
its original pickup location. A transfer is set and the hold status
is changed from waiting to correctly showing the item as in transit.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch updates the wording in the 'lost and found' process to more
closely reflect what the process is achieving by replacing 'RETURNED'
with 'FOUND'
Test plan:
1) Grep codebase for _FixAccountForLostAndReturned and note there are no
longer any instanced of it.
2) Run t/db_dependent/Circulation.t and note it passes
3) Test returning/renewing an item that has been marked as lost and note
the updated values in the accountlines now use LOST_FOUND as
credit_type_code and 'FOUND' as the status for the 'LOST' fee
(debit_type_code 'LOST')
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Nick Clemens
Fridolin Somers
Martin Renvoize
Didier Gautheron
Tomas Cohen Arazi
Jonathan Druart
Kyle M Hall
Andrew Isherwood
Christopher Brannon
Jesse Weaver