This clarifies the preference name to make it clear we are talking about
the 'parts' that make up an 'item'. 'Part' is a well known term in
british english libraries and I think perhaps 'Materials' may be
confused with other terms?
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
With this follow-up patch, the intended confirmation of checkin based on
CircConfirmParts value is effective.
Sponsored-by: Royal College of Music [https://www.rcm.ac.uk/]
Sponsored-by: PTFS Europe [https://ptfs-europe.com/]
Signed-off-by: Frédéric Demians <f.demians@tamil.fr>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Test plan
1/ Catalogue an item to contain multiple parts by populating 'Materials
specified (bound volume or other part)'
2/ Enable the new system preference 'CircConfirmParts'
3/ Attempt to checkout the item created in step 1 to a user and note
that confirmation is now required.
4/ Checkout the item
5/ Attempt to checkin the item you have just checked out and note that
confirmation is required.
6/ Signoff
Sponsored-by: Royal College of Music [https://www.rcm.ac.uk/]
Sponsored-by: PTFS Europe [https://ptfs-europe.com/]
Signed-off-by: Frédéric Demians <f.demians@tamil.fr>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Bug 19014 altered CanBookBeRenewed to return (auto_)too_soon over on_reserve
For cron purposes this is the correct behaviour.
For display purposes we wish to see on_reserve over too_soon
This patchset adds a switch to 'CanBookBeRenewed' to alter the priority of these statuses
To test:
1 - set NoRenewalBeforePrecision to date only
2 - set a circ rule to auto-renewal=yes, no renewal before=0, checkout period to 7 days
3 - check item out
4 - confirm item shows Scheduled For Automatic Renewal in issues table
5 - place a hold on the item for another patron
6 - reload issues table for patron 1, confirm checkout still shows "scheduled for automatic renewal" rather than "on hold"
7 - change No Renewal Before value to 7
8 - reload issues table for patron 1, confirm checkout now shows "on hold"
9 - Apply patch
10 - restart_all
11 - Reload the issues table - confirm 'on_hold' still shows
12 - Change No Renewal Before to 0
13 - Refresh issues table, still shows 'On hold'
14 - perl misc/cronjobs/automatic_renewals.pl -v
15 - Result shows 'auto_too_soon'
16 - prove -v t/db_dependent/Circulation.t
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Bob Bennhoff <bbennhoff@clicweb.org>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
When batch editing, 2 reindex calls are sent to ES/Zebra.
We can easily avoid that reusing the skip_modzebra_update (renamed skip_record_index)
Additionally we should only send one request for biblio, and we should
only do it if we succeed
As the whole batch mod is in a transaction it is possible to fail in which case
Zebra queue is reset, but ES indexes have already been set
In addition to the skip param this patchset moves Zebra and Elasticsearch calls to
Indexer modules and introduces a generic Koha::SearchEngine::Indexer so that we don't
need to check the engine when calling for index
The new index_records routine takes an array so that we can reduce the calls to
the ES server.
The index_records routine for Zebra loops over ModZebra to avoid affecting current behaviour
Test plan:
General tests, under both search engines:
1 - Add a biblio and confirm it is searchable
2 - Edit the biblio and confirm changes are searchable
3 - Add an item, confirm it is searchable
4 - Delete an item, confirm it is not searchable
5 - Delete a biblio, confirm it is not searchable
6 - Add an authority and confirm it is searchable
7 - Delete an authority and confirm it is not searchable
Batch mod tests, under both search engines
1 - Have a bib with several items, none marked 'not for loan'
2 - Do a staff search that returns this biblio
3 - Items show as available
4 - Click on title to go to details page
5 - Edit->Item in a batch
6 - Set the not for loan status for all items
7 - Repeat your search
8 - Items show as not for loan
9 - Test batch deleting items
a - Test with a list of items, not deleting bibs
b - Test with a list of items, deleting bibs if no items remain where all items are only item on a biblio:
SELECT MAX(barcode) FROM items GROUP BY biblionumber HAVING COUNT(barcode) IN (1)
c - Test with a list of items, deleting bibs if no items remain where some items are the only item on a biblio:
SELECT MAX(barcode) FROM items GROUP BY biblionumber HAVING COUNT(barcode) IN (1,2)
10 - Confirm records are update/deleted as appropriate
Signed-off-by: Bob Bennhoff <bbennhoff@clicweb.org>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch
* sets one check for reserves and another for old_reserves in
atomic update
* Adds a message below the checkbox and adds detail when a hold is non
priority
* Fixes issue when there are more than one hold, but the first is non
priority
* Adds test case for this last scenario
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch implements necesary code to implement non priority feature
To test:
1) Apply all patches.
2) Run updatedatabase.
3) Checkout a specific item for patron1.
4) Place a hold on the same item for patron2 (do not check non priority
hold checkbox).
5) Try to renew the item for patron1.
CHECK => in checkouts table, there is a message that the item could not
be renewed because there was a hold.
6) Cleanup all checkouts and holds.
7) repeat steps 3 to 5, but this time check the non priority checkbox.
SUCCESS => item was renewed
8) prove t/db_dependent/Holds.t
Signed-off-by: Lisette Scheer <lisettes@latahlibrary.org>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
After discussion with Martin we decided that it could be the correct way
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
It was not used
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This code was duplicated and we are going to need it.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Remove duplicated logic for searching circulation rules.
This can be replaced with get_effective_rules().
To test:
1. prove t/db_dependent/Circulation/GetHardDueDate.t
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
To test:
1 - Go to Circulation->Transfer
2 - Note your signed in branch
3 - Find an item from your branch and create a transfer to branch B
4 - Confirm the item is marked as held at your current branch and is being transferred to B
5 - Find an item from a third branch, branch C
6 - Transfer that item to brnach B
7 - Confirm the item is held at your current branch and is being transferred to B
8 - prove -v t/db_dependent/Circulation.t
9 - prove -v t/db_dependent/Koha/Items.t
10 - prove -v t/db_dependent/RotatingCollections.t
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Bug 26078: (follow-up) used validTransfer instead of checking WrongTransfer message
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
To test:
- Have 2+ branches
- Set your default return policy to Item returns to issuing library
- Find an item with holding branch of Branch A
- Set your library to Branch B
- Check item in
- Koha generates a transfer to Branch A. In doing so, it sets the item holding branch to Branch B
- Set your library to Branch A
- Check item in
- Koha generate a transfer to Branch B. In doing so, it sets the item holding branch to Branch A
- Set you library to Branch A
- Check the item in
. . . Repeat indefinitely.
Apply patch
Repeat
No more loop
Signed-off-by: Sally <sally.healey@cheshiresharedservices.gov.uk>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The original code assumed every codepath should be trated as a
successful check-in. Such is not the case and the regression tests
verify that the code acknowledges this.
To test:
1. Apply the regression tests patch
2. Run:
$ kshell
k$ prove t/db_dependent/Illrequests.t
=> FAIL: Tests fail
3. Apply this patch
4. Repeat 2
=> SUCCESS: Tests pass!
5. Sign off :-D
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This is only a perltidy of _check_max_qty to remove some space
inconsistencies, like:
if( $max_checkouts_allowed eq '' ){ return;}
if ( $checkout_count - $onsite_checkout_count >= $max_checkouts_allowed ) {
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
We only need to prefetch items if CircControl is set to ItemHomeLibrary
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Same as before but for patron_maxissueqty
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Making use of Koha::Checkouts make the code much more readable here.
It fixes 2 flaws:
* $type was not quote escaped
* the effective itemtype was not used which could lead to wrong
calculation (for instance item-level_itypes is set but the item does
not have the itype defined)
However there is something to note, we are going to make things a bit
less effective as we are now fetching the items to get their effective
itemtype (vs a SUM done at DB level)
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The different calls to _check_max_qty can be improved to highlight what
is really changing between each of them.
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch replaces all calls to RefundLostItemFeeRules with
Koha::CirculationRules->get_lostreturn_policy and removes the module it
makes redundant.
Test plan
1/ Confirm that there are no longer any uses of RefundLostItemFeeRules
in the codebase
2/ Confirm circulation tests still all pass
3/ Confirm you can still set and unset the lost return rules
4/ Signoff
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch makes the hooks be called only if the checkin is effective
(i.e. if it is not rejected for some reason.
To test:
1. Apply the regression tests patch
2. Run:
$ kshell
k$ prove t/db_dependent/Koha/Plugins/Circulation_hooks.t
=> FAIL: Tests fail
3. Apply this patch
4. Repeat 2
=> SUCCESS: Tests pass!
5. Sign off :-D
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
AddReturn can be called on an item even if it's not checked out (to
trigger holds for instance).
The hook should (?) not be called in that situation
Test plan:
Confirm the above and that the following tests are now passing:
t/db_dependent/SIP/Message.t
t/db_dependent/Reserves.t
t/db_dependent/Circulation/issue.t
t/db_dependent/SIP/Transaction.t
t/db_dependent/Circulation.t
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch gets rid of a helper method used for calling the plugin
hooks.
To test:
1. Run:
$ kshell
k$ prove t/db_dependent/Koha/Plugins/Circulation_hooks.t
=> SUCCESS: Tests pass!
2. Apply this patch
3. Repeat 1
=> SUCCESS: Tests still pass!
4. Sign off :-D
Sponsored-by: ByWater Solutions
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch simplifies the payload as suggested on bug 25855. It also
keeps some specific params that cannot be deduced from the passed
checkout object, (e.g. if it is an onsite checkout).
Tests are cleared and added for this special exceptions.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch adds a call to _after_circ_actions into AddIssue and passes
an appropriate payload for plugins to utilise after issuing items.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch makes the hook be passed the Koha::Checkout object instead
of a hand-crafted list of attributes.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch generalizes the hook so it can be used by other circulation
actions.
Tests are also simplified by mocking some of the (extensive) plugin
hooks.
To test:
1. Repeat the test plan on the original patch
=> SUCCESS: All good
2. Sign off :-D
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch adds a new hook to notify plugins about renewal actions. To
test it:
1. Apply the unit tests
2. Run:
$ kshell
k$ prove t/db_dependent/Koha/Plugins/Circulation_hooks.t
=> FAIL: The tests expect some warnings to show, and they don't (i.e.
the sample plugin hook is not being called).
3. Apply this patch
4. Repeat 2
=> SUCCESS: Tests pass! The hook is being called on renewal!
5. Sign off :-D
Sponsored-by: ByWater Solutions
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
I can not see how this code is useful here. It checks for a reserve with priority 0 and found = NULL
That is not a status that should occur when filling a transfer. Either the found is 'T' if we are transferring due
to the hold, or the hold was placed after the transfer was initiated, and so the priority is not 0
Additional, AddReturn checks for reserves later and asks the staff to confirm waiting status.
ModReserveStatus also calls CartToShelf regardless of what happens here.
To test:
1 - Set UpdateItemLocationOnCheckin to:
_ALL_: CART
2 - SetAutomaticItemReturn = Do
3 - Check an item in at a different branch than it's homebranch to create a transfer
4 - Check the item in at it's homebranch
5 - View the item details page
6 - Item is not in CART location
7 - Apply patch
8 - Repeat
9 - Item is in CART location after completion of transfer
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Robb <jrobb@sekls.org>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This adds the ability to not refund lost item fees on return if the item
has been lost for more than a given number of days.
Test Plan:
1) Set the new system preference NoRefundOnLostReturnedItemsAge to a number of days
2) Find a lost item that has been lost longer than that NoRefundOnLostReturnedItemsAge days which would have otherwise been refunded
3) Return the item
4) Note no refund on the lost item fee was processed, the fee remains unchanged
5) prove t/db_dependent/Circulation.t
Signed-off-by: Deb Stephenson <DStephen@dubuque.lib.ia.us>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch moves the accountline->store call below the FinesLog code
such that we return the same 'thing' from _FixOverduesOnReturn as the
other clauses of the routine.
We also take the oportunity to clean up the warning thrown by an errant
call to the routine such that we output the actual itemnumber rather
than a HASH reference marker.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch removes any overdues which would be reversed on a backdated
return if CalcFineOnBackdate is enabled and the user has not already
attempted to pay off the accruing fine.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The item's location where not passed to UpdateStat
Signed-off-by: Signed-off-by: Sonia Bouis <sonia.bouis@univ-lyon3.fr>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
To test:
1 - Find or create a record with 10 items
2 - Set sysprefs:
decreaseLoanHighHolds - enable
decreaseLoanHighHoldsDuration - 2
decreaseLoanHighHoldsValue - 2
decreaseLoanHighHoldsControl - 'over the number of holdable items'/dynamic
3 - Set circ rules to allow 1 hold per record on the relevant record
4 - Place 3 holds on the record
5 - Check one item in and confirm hold to set to waiting
6 - Issue to the patron with the waiting hold
7 - Get a notice that loan period is decreased
8 - Don't confirm the checkout
9 - Apply patch
10 - Restart all the things
11 - Repeat checkout, no decrease this time!
Signed-off-by: Christopher Brannon <cbrannon@cdalibrary.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch changes the new circulation rule that's introduced from
useDaysMode to daysmode to improve consistency with other rule names.
We also update the accessors and code using them to reflect the new
term.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
There are 3 other occurrences where the new circ rule can be used:
* C4::Circulation::checkHighHolds
* Koha::Hold->set_waiting
* misc/cronjobs/thirdparty/TalkingTech_itiva_outbound.pl
Test plan:
* checkHighHolds
Enable decreaseLoanHighHolds and fill decreaseLoanHighHoldsDuration
Setup things to hit a "high demand" alert with a shortened due date
Check an item out
=> The due date must be recalculated depending on the circ rule useDaysMode.
* set_waiting
Set ExcludeHolidaysFromMaxPickUpDelay to "1" (note that there is currently
a bug in the description of the syspref, see bug 22381 comment 19)
Mark a hold waiting
The expiration date should have been set depending on the value of the
circ rule.
* TalkingTech cronjob
Cannot test this
Signed-off-by: Simon Perry <simon.perry@itcarlow.ie>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Moving the useDaysMode system preference to a circulation rule will add
much more flexibility in the calculation of the due date.
The initial request was to make hourly loan returned on closed when
(when checked out on the same close day).
To do so we do not want to take into account the calendar.
However the calendar need to be taken into account for other loan item types.
Other scenarios are possible, for instance depending on the branch.
This patchset will add a new "Days mode" column (next to "Loan period")
to the circulation rules page, with the different values of the
"useDaysMode" system preference + a "default" value, to default to the
system preference value.
Test plan:
- Define a long loan item type (like 10 days) that will use the calendar
(or default to the pref value, if the pref is not set to "ignore the
calendar")
- and a hourly loan (like 2 hours) that will ignore the calendar
- Create items with those item types
- Mark today as a closed day
- Check the items out
=> The hourly loan is due the same day
=> The other loan is due on an open day
QA note:
There is the need to force the "days_mode" option when Koha::Calendar is
initiated for the due date calculation. To make sure devs will not
forget it, the methods that need have it defined will throw an
exception.
Sponsored-by: Institute of Technology Carlow
Signed-off-by: Simon Perry <simon.perry@itcarlow.ie>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
As we are now removing them from MarkIssueReturned they should not be
removed from AddReturn as well.
Also I think this will fix a regression, if $doreturn is not set (in
case the item is withdrawn and BlockReturnOfWithdrawnItems or the item
is lost and BlockReturnOfLostItems, and other specific cases).
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
It's quite hard to know where this need to be fixed.
it can be either MarkIssueReturned or LostItem, depending on the
different cases we want to handle.
This patch picked MarkIssueReturned, but maybe the similar code in
AddReturn needs to be removed then.
== Test plan ==
1. Set MarkLostItemsAsReturned to 'from items tab of the catalog module'
2. Set AutoRemoveOverduesRestrictions to 'Do'
3. Set up an overdues restriction in the notice triggers
4. Check out an item and let the overdues process restrict the account
5. Navigate to the moredetail.pl page (items tab) for the overdue item
6. Mark the item lost
7. Return to the account in question - notice the item has been returned, but the restriction remains
8. Clean state: remove restriction + remove item lost status
9. Apply patch
10. Redo the test but this time in addition to the item being returned,
the restriction will be lifted.
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
To make sure we are going to display the correct hold's info we need to
pass the reserve_id.
== Test plan ==
1. Add some content to HOLD_SLIP notice, e.g.
<h2>[% branch.branchname %]</h2>
<div>[% biblio.author %]<br>[% biblio.title %]<br>[% item.barcode %]
<ul><li> Reserve ID: [% hold.reserve_id %]</li>
<li>Expiration date: [% hold.expirationdate %]</li></ul>
2. Add 2 holds for 1 patron to a single record
3. Check the reserve IDs in the reserves table - on a clean sandbox, they will be 1 and 2
4. Check in one of the items from the record and print the slip
5. Note that the reserve ID on the slip is 2 and the expiration date is blank
6. Repeated check ins do not change this
7. Check in a second item from the record
8. Note that the reserve ID for this hold is also 2, but this time the expiration date is filled in
9. Check in the first item again - the reserve ID stays as 2, but this time the expiration date is filled in
10. Apply patch
11. cancel the holds to come back to a clean state
(and maybe ensure items aren't in transit)
12. redo the test and see the following differences
13. 1st checkin:
1. expiration date ok
2. the reserve ID is the one of the first hold
14. 2nd checkin:
1. expiration date ok
2. the reserve ID is the one of the second hold
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
If think this case does not apply to real-life, but the logic needs to
be fixed.
If an item is due now, and AddReturn is called now with a return date in
the future, the issue is overdue and the patron must be debarred.
However it is not as we compare with now and not the return date
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Koha::Account->add_credit is expecting a positive amount.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Didier Gautheron <didier.gautheron@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Test plan:
1) Before the patch when one checks in something using the KOCT the last seen
date is not updated.
2) After the patch when one checks in something using the KOCT the last seen
date is updated.
Signed-off-by: Laurence Rault <laurence.rault@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
In Koha 18.11 backdating a return triggered a recalculation of the fine. This was removed in bug 14591, and I believe it was in error. The bug report itself has no justification for the change in behavior.
Test Plan:
1) Disable CalculateFinesOnReturn
2) Backdate an overdue with fines, note the fine does not change
3) Apply this patch
4) Repeat step 2
5) The fine should be updated!
Signed-off-by: Kelly McElligott <kelly@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
We should use Koha::DateUtils instead of Date::Time directly
This patch simplay replaces calls to now() with a call to dt_from_string()
which does effectively the same thing.
Probably reading the code and verifying changes is sufficient but...
To test:
1 - confirm the files all compile
2 - confirm all tests pass
3 - confirm Koha still works
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
In some tests we want to know if we are in a testing environment.
When run the usual way, our trick works, the perl interpreter matches 'prove':
$ENV{_} eq 'prove'
In other situations, we have the KOHA_NO_TABLE_LOCKS environment variables, for the SendCirculationAlert race conditions (see bug 15854 and bug 18364).
For unknown reasons, Jenkins runs the tests with /usr/bin/perl.
This patch suggests to rename KOHA_NO_TABLE_LOCKS and use KOHA_TESTING
instead, when prove is not used (or not correctly detected as it it the
case for Jenkins)
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
To test:
1 - Verify on staff side that patron can be edited to opt in our out of auto renewal
2 - Check out some items to a patron opted in to auto renewal
3 - Ensure the items are checked out and set to autorenew
4 - Login on the opac at the patron
5 - Verify items cannot be renewed as scheduled for auto-renewal
6 - On staff side, opt patron out of auto renewal
7 - Verify on opac items are no longer marked for auto renewal
8 - Run the auto renewal cron job, items are not renewed
9 - Set 'no renewal before' to a setting that would prevent renewal
10 - Verify that opting patron in or out of auto renewal changes only the reason items cannot be renewed
11 - Set 'no renewal before' to a setting that would allow for renewal
12 - Verify that opting patron in/out changes their ability to renew
13 - Verify that when opted out cron does not renew
14 - Verify that when opted in the item is auto renewed
15 - Reset the due date, opt out, verify manual renewal succeeds
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patchset moves all code to calculate the correct renewal branch into Koha::Item.pm
When interface is opac we follow the syspref, otherwise we use the current userenv, or pass through
a defined branch
To test:
1 - Check out an item to a patron
2 - Set allowed renewals in the circ rules to 100 (just so you can keep testing)
3 - Renew the item in staff interface, confirm it is recorded correctly in statistics table (as signed in branch)
4 - Renew via the opac, testing with each setting of OpacRenewalbranch
5 - prove -v t/db_dependent/Koha/Item.t
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
We do not need this subroutine, moving it where it is used.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Starting to replace the ModItem calls with Koha::Item->store
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch adds support for passing a trigger to
C4::Circulation::transferbook and passes 'RotatingCollection' to it when
called inside the rotating collections routine.
Test plan:
1/ Perform a rotating collection transfer operations
2/ Check the database for instances of 'RotatingCollection' in the
branchtransfers.reason field.
3/ Signoff
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch adds handling to catch transfers that may have been triggered
on item return.
Test Plan:
1) Enable AutomaticItemReturn and accompanying system preference
2) Return an item to the wrong branch and note the transfer
3) Check the database for the new trigger value
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
To test:
1 - Place a hold on an item
2 - Go to Circulation->Transfers
3 - Attempt to transfer item to a branch it is not expected at
4 - No warning
5 - Apply patches
6 - Repeate
7 - You get a notice that there is a hold and must deal with the hold (or ignore)
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Looks like the atomicupdate and sysprefs.sql changes were lost at some point.
Don't forget to run QA tools on your patches before submitting
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch updates a request's status to RET upon return
Sponsored-by: Loughborough University
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Some rebase issues, accounttype no longer exists, circ rules make
CanBookBeRenewed fail, so we mock that too
interface must be passed as a hashref
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
When the RenewAccruingItemWhenPaid syspref is enabled and all the fines
on an item that is accruing fines are paid, we automatically renew that
item to prevent it from starting to accrue fines again.
This patch adds an additional argument to C4::Circulation::AddRenewal
which allows us to skip the calculation of fines upon renewal, which we
don't want to do if the fines on that item have just been paid. Existing
calls to AddRenewal have not been amended because there seems to be a
convention of only passing undef when adding arguments that require
their positioning to be maintained. Since the new argument is the last
one, this is not the case with any existing call.
Sponsored-by: Loughborough University
Signed-off-by: Lucy Harrison <L.M.Harrison@lboro.ac.uk>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
To Test:
1) Place a hold on an item.
2) Check in the item to trigger the hold. Item is now listed as
waiting.
3) Set branch to a different library.
4) Check in the item to trigger the hold. Notice that nothing but a
local use is recorded.
5) Apply the patch.
6) Repeat steps 1-4. Notice that the hold is triggered around routed to
its original pickup location. A transfer is set and the hold status
is changed from waiting to correctly showing the item as in transit.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch updates the wording in the 'lost and found' process to more
closely reflect what the process is achieving by replacing 'RETURNED'
with 'FOUND'
Test plan:
1) Grep codebase for _FixAccountForLostAndReturned and note there are no
longer any instanced of it.
2) Run t/db_dependent/Circulation.t and note it passes
3) Test returning/renewing an item that has been marked as lost and note
the updated values in the accountlines now use LOST_FOUND as
credit_type_code and 'FOUND' as the status for the 'LOST' fee
(debit_type_code 'LOST')
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This necessitates moving the circ rules from using '*' to using
undef/NULL.
Signed-off-by: Minna Kivinen <minna.kivinen@hamk.fi>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
To test:
1 - Checkout an item with auto renewal set and eligible for auto renew
2 - Set no renewal before in the circ rules to 99 (something greater than the checkout period)
3 - perl misc/cronjobs/automatic_renewals.pl
4 - Check the statistics table, note the branch for renewal is null
SELECT * FROM statistics WHERE itemnumber={itemnumber} AND type='RENEWAL'
5 - Apply patch
6 - Repeat 1-4
7 - Note the branch is set to the issuing branch
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Ed Veal <eveal@mckinneytexas.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Test plan:
0 - Do not apply this patch
1 - Check out an item to a patron
2 - Make sure a fee will be charged when lost
3 - Mark the item lost
4 - Make sure the fee will not be refunded on return of the item
5 - Return the item
6 - Check it out to a new patron
7 - Write off the fine for the original patron
=> The item is now checked in
8 - Apply this patch and repeat 1 to 7
=> The item is still checked out
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
It appears that the transition to using Koha::Item in AddReturn has introduced a bug. Previously $item was a hashref with the key 'itemtype', now that it's an object, it has no itemtype method and so triggers an error with the message "The method Koha::Item->itemtype is not covered by tests!".
Test Plan:
1) Enable Branch Transfer Limits via itemtype
2) Check in an item
3) Note the error
4) Apply this patch
5) Restart all the things!
6) Check in an item
7) No error!
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Maribeth (Turner) Shafer <mshafer@ckls.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Use of uninitialized value $record_restrictions in uc at /kohadevbox/koha/C4/Circulation.pm line 3981
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
With bug 24217 pushed, lot of warnings appears during the tests are run.
Most of them are "Use of uninitialized value in "
Test plan:
Take a look at the output of run 1049
https://jenkins.koha-community.org/job/Koha_Master_D9/1049/consoleFull
Most of the warnings from this run will be removed by this patch
At least 2 are not fixed:
Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at /kohadevbox/koha/C4/Reserves.pm line 791.
t/db_dependent/Items_DelItemCheck.t => see 23463
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
We absolutely need that for modules.
We are enabling strict by using Modern::Perl.
Note that other modules from C4 use strict and warnings, instead of
Modern::Perl
Test plan: git grep 2505 **/*.pm should not return any results
And let's see later what needs to be fixed.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
If there is a limit for the number of suspension days
(maxsuspensiondays), the calculation is wrong. We are reducing the
number of days before taking into account the suspension charging
interval.
For instance, a checkin is 1 year late and the circ rules are defined to
charge 7 days every 15 days.
It results in 365 * 7 / 15 days of suspension => 170 days
Before this patch the calculation was:
365 * 7 limited to 333, 333 / 15 => 22 days
Test plan:
Given the examples in the commit messages and the description of the bug
report, setup complex circulation rules and confirm that the debarment
dates are calculated correctly
Signed-off-by: Hugo Agud <hagud@orex.es>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
No changes expected here. For the next patch we are going to need to add
test and calculate the new debarment date. To ease the writing of these
tests the calculation is moved out of the existing subroutine.
Signed-off-by: Hugo Agud <hagud@orex.es>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Wrong conflict resolution, the following
commit 6eade474ed
Bug 18276: Remove GetBiblioFromItemNumber - Easy ones
restored a previous change from
commit 546379cc92
Bug 17680: C4::Circulation - Remove GetItemIssue, simple calls
Not that "easy" or "simple"...
Test plan:
Run the test before and after this patch.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
When you use the date picker or book drop mode and check in an item that is due on that date, a fine is assessed and not refunded.
For example: item 12345 is due on 11/19/2109 23:59. On 11/20/2019 I check the item in using date picker/book drop setting the check in date to 11/19/2019 23:59, the patron is charged a fine, and the fine is not cleared as would be expected, since the item is being checked in before it is overdue.
Test Plan:
1) Back date a checkout so it is overdue
2) Run fines.pl to generate the fine
3) Return the item, backdating to the same date/time is was due
4) Note the fine was not removed
5) Apply this patch
6) Repeat steps 1-3
7) Fine should be zeroed out now!
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch makes the calculation of suspension expiration configuration
detached from the finesCalendar syspref. This way libraries have more
flexibility when setting circ rules.
I wrote this path as a bugfix, because the recent change pushed by bug 19204
changed this behavior and libraries have been complaining since they got
upgraded.
It is a minor change, just adding the new syspref, and replacing the
single place in which it is used for debarment calculation for the new
one.
The tests are updated similarly, just adding the new mocked syspref as
it was with the old one.
To test:
- Apply this patches
- updatedatabase
- Run:
$ kshell
k$ prove t/db_dependent/Circulation.t
=> SUCCESS: Tests pass!
- Sign off :-D
Sponsored-by: Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
Signed-off-by: Michal Denar <black23@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This adds the ability to alert a librarian of an item claimed as returned is actually returned.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Lisette Scheer <lisetteslatah@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
We require next_open_day & prev_open_day to be more flexible. We could
create a separate sub, but that's not very DRY given that they'll do
pretty much the same thing.
So next_open_day becomes next_open_days and prev_open_day becomes
prev_open_days and both functions accept an additional parameter which
determines how many days they add or subtract.
All calls of these two functions have been modified accordingly.
Sponsored-by: Cheshire West and Chester Council
Sponsored-by: Cheshire East Council
Sponsored-by: Newcastle City Council
Sponsored-by: Sefton Council
Signed-off-by: Liz Rea <wizzyrea@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch updates the variable name '$branch' to '$branchcode' in a
number of places to make it clearer what the variable contains.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
It looks like over progressive rebases of bug 20912 a clause was lost
within CanBookBeIssued such that a fatal error may be triggered if an
item with no corresponding itemtype was passed into the routine.
Additionally the we were passing a Koha::Library object to CalcDateDue
rather than a branchcode which resulted in a different duedate being
used in 'CanBookBeIssued' when compared to 'AddIssue'.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
* Update C4::Accounts::chargelostitem
* Update C4::Accounts::manualinvoice
* Update C4::Circulation::_FixOverduesOnReturn
* Update C4::Circulation::_FixAccountForLostAndReturned
* Update C4::Overdues::UpdateFine
* Update C4::Overdues::GetFine
* Update C4::Overdues::GetOverduesForBranch
* Update Koha::Account->pay
* Update Koha::Account->add_debit
* Update Koha::Account->non_issues_charges
* Update Koha::Account::Line->apply
* Update Koha::Account::Line->adjust
* Update controller scripts
* Update reports scripts
* Update tests
Test Plan
1) Run the test suit and ensure everything still passes
2) Test reports/cash_register_stats still works
3) Test that adding manual invoices still works
4) Test that making payments still works
5) Test that lost item fee handling still works
6) Test that invoice printing still works
7) Test that the sco still works
Signed-off-by: Séverine QUEUNE <severine.queune@bulac.fr>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
We should use the existing pattern of calling schema directly on
Koha::Database rather than creating a new object.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch starts a transaction and only commits if renewal and fines
updates and charges are successful (partial in any cna be problematic)
There is no feedback (as currently there is none either) but if part
fails, all fails.
I didn't include stats and notifications in the transaction, but we
could. (Edit JD: not true, they are included)
To test:
1 - Apply patch
2 - prove t/db_dependent/Circulation.t
3 - Attempt circs and renewals should be no difference
4 - If possible make part of transaction fail and ensure all fails
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Amended: commit title and one indendation (return statement)
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
When trying to transfer an unknown barcode in
/cgi-bin/koha/circ/branchtransfers.pl you get the error :
Can't call method "itemnumber" on an undefined value at
/home/koha/src/C4/Circulation.pm line 319.
This comes from C4::Circulation::transferbook which should stop when
finding unknown barcode.
Test plan :
1) Go to /cgi-bin/koha/circ/branchtransfers.pl
2) Enter a barcode not existing in database
3) Without patch you get a software error, with patch you get a message
saying 'No Item with barcode'
4) Enter a barcode existing in database and check transfer is OK
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Bin Wen <bin.wen@inlibro.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Test plan:
Run t/db_dependent/Circulation.t, t/db_dependent/Koha/Account.t,
t/db_dependent/Koha/Account/Lines.t and
t/db_dependent/api/v1/patrons_accounts.t and all should pass.
Signed-off-by: Liz Rea <wizzyrea@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Circulation::TooMany gets itemtype from $item var beeing a Koha::Item unblessed.
When itemtype is at biblio level, calling $item->{'itemtype'} is wrong.
Test plan :
1) On a catalog with itemtype at item level : pref item-level_itypes=1
2) Create a biblio record with itemtype BOOK
3) Create an item on this biblio record with itemtype BOOK
4) Delete all issuing rules
5) Create a issuing rule with itemtype BOOK, any catagorie, any branch
6) Check-out the item
7) => Checkout is allowed
8) Check-in item
9) Change itemtype at biblio level : pref item-level_itypes=0
10) Check-out the item
11) => Checkout is not allowed
You see message "No circulation rule is defined for this patron and itemtype combination"
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch adds the ability to set an unlimited number of guarantors
for a given patron. As before, each guarantor may be linked to another
Koha patron, and all the behavior that applies to a given guarantor
remains the same.
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Run updatedatabase.pl
3) Find some patrons with guarantors, verify the still have their guarantor
4) Test adding and removing guarantors on a patron record, both Koha users and not
5) Verify the "Add child" button works
6) Verify NoIssuesChargeGuarantees still works
7) Verify tools/cleanborrowers.pl will not delete a guarantor
8) Verify the guarantors are displayed on moremember.pl
9) Verify the guarantor is removed by members/update-child.pl
10) Verify the guarantor is removed by misc/cronjobs/j2a.pl
11) Verify import patrons converts guarantor_id, relationship, contactfirstname,
and contactsurname into a guarantor
12) prove t/Patron.t
13) prove t/db_dependent/Circulation.t
14) prove t/db_dependent/Circulation/NoIssuesChargeGuarantees.t
15) prove t/db_dependent/Items.t
16) prove t/db_dependent/Koha/Patrons.t
17) prove t/db_dependent/Members.t
18) prove t/db_dependent/Patron/Relationships.t
Signed-off-by: Kim Peine <kmpeine@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Agustin Moyano <agustinmoyano@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Liz Rea <wizzyrea@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
To test:
1. Set up an item type with a rental charge
2. Issue an item with that item type
3. Check fines, a charge of type 'Rent' will be visible with a
description of 'Rental'.
4. Renew the item
5. Check fines, a charge of type 'Rent' will be visible with a
description of 'Renewal of Rental Item TITLE BARCODE' where TITLE and
BARCODE are the items title and barcode.
5. Apply the patch
6. Repeat steps 1-4, charge descriptions should now be empty and charge
types should display 'Rental fee' and 'Renewal of rental item'.
7. Repeat steps 1-6 for an item type with a daily rental charge and note
the charge types are now 'Daily rental fee' and 'Renewal of daily rental
item'
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Matha Fuerst <mfuerst@hmcpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Matha Fuerst <mfuerst@hmcpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch removed references to setting and getting the items.paidfor
field. Where it was used for display, in moredetail.pl, we replace it
with a query on the accountlines.
Test plan:
1) Apply patch
2) Pay off a LOST item
3) Check for the associated display of 'Paidfor?:' on the itemdetails
page
4) Writeoff a LOST item
5) Check that a 'Paidfor?:' is not displayed on the itemdetails page.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Liz Rea <wizzyrea@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Up until now we marked lost items as returned in the accountlines, now
we have the oportunity to mark these distinctly with an appropriate
status we should.
Test Plan
1) Find an overdue with fines
2) Ensure you are not forgiving fines when an item is marked as lost
3) Mark the item as lost
4) Confirm the Fine is given a status of 'Lost'
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Convert 'L' to 'LOST' to become more descriptive in it's use.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch will move the list item refund rules from a dedicated table to the circulation_rules table.
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Run updatedatabase.pl
3) Verify lost item refund rules remain unchanged
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Agustin Moyano <agustinmoyano@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
If a lost item fee is written off, it creates a writeoff with the same itemnumber but the amount column is a negative number.
Now, when the lost item is returned, it calls _FixAccountForLostAndReturned which searchs for all accountlines with an account type of 'L' or 'W'.
Then, if the *first* of those lines has an outstanding balance, a credit is created and *all* the lines found are passed to $credit->apply. The apply method then calls is_debit on each line and when it hits the writeoff, it throws an exception ( Koha::Exceptions::Account::IsNotDebit ).
When this happens, the credit is creating but not applied the the outstanding lost item fee, and the librarian is presented with an error page.
It seems like the solution is to only fetch the first result since it seems like that is the only one we should be operating on.
Test Plan:
1) Create a lost item with a fee
2) Create a manual debit using the barcode of the item
3) Write off that manual debit
4) Check in the item, note the error
5) Apply this patch
6) Repeat steps 1-3
7) Check in the item, no error!
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Agustin Moyano <agustinmoyano@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Liz Rea <wizzyrea@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Test Plan:
1) Apply dependancies
2) Apply this patch set
3) Run updatedatabase.pl
4) Ensure holdallowed and hold_fulfillment_policy rules behavior remains unchanged
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Agustin Moyano <agustinmoyano@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Liz Rea <wizzyrea@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Test Plan:
1) Checkout an item to a patron
2) Ensure the item has a replacement cost (or itemtype has default)
3) Ensure patrons are charged when items lost
4) Mark the item lost
5) Confirm patron has a fine
6) Write off the fine
7) Delete the patron
8) Check in the item
9) Note the internal server error
10) Apply this patch
11) Repeat steps 1-8
12) Note there is no internal server error!
13) prove t/db_dependent/Circulation.t
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Not kidding, it's again, and will certainly appear more.
The problem is that we should have a NULL value in DB to make things
more readable and logical. Now we need a quick fix.
Test plan:
Set "Current checkouts allowed" to unlimited (empty string)
Try to check an item out
=> Without this patch we are blocked with a "too many" message
=> With this patch applied the correct behavior is back!
Signed-off-by: Mark Tompsett <mtompset@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Test plan:
1 - Issue an item to a patron with a backdated due date
2 - Run fines.pl - note you generate a fine for the patron
3 - Run longoverdue.pl - make sure MarkLostItemsAsReturned is turned off
and to charge
4 - Confirm the patron has a lost fee and an overdue
5 - Return the item
6 - With patch applied, patron should now have 1 overdue fine and 1 lost fine
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Liz Rea <wizzyrea@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Almost everywhere we call IsAvailableForItemLevelRequest we already have
a Koha::Patron and Koha::Item object. It makes sense to use them to
avoid a refetch
Test plan:
It would be good to test this patch on top of 19300 and 19301 and make
sure everything works as expected
Signed-off-by: Hayley Mapley <hayleymapley@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch fixes remaining cases of the list => scalar change.
To test:
- Run:
$ kshell
k$ prove t/db_dependent/Holds/HoldFulfillmentPolicy.t t/db_dependent/Reserves.t
=> FAIL: Tests fail
- Apply this patch
- Run:
k$ prove t/db_dependent/Holds/HoldFulfillmentPolicy.t t/db_dependent/Reserves.t
=> SUCCESS: Tests pass
- Sign off :-D
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Prior to this patch the exemptfine option for_FixOverduesOnReturn would
directly set the overdue amount to 0 rather than creating an appropriate
credit of the type forgiven and offseting it against the debt.
Test Plan:
1) Find a checkout that is overdue with fines
2) Check the item in with the forgive fines option checked
3) Note that the users account details now shows the overdue as forgiven
and a forgiven credit is added which matches the overdue amount (and is
applied against it, i.e. both overdue and forgiven lines have 0
amountoutstanding).
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Liz Rea <wizzyrea@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Liz Rea <wizzyrea@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch adds a new syspref "UpdateItemLocationOnCheckin" which
accepts pairs of shelving locations. On check-in the items location is
compared ot the location on the left and, if it matches, is updated to
the location on the left.
This preference replaces ReturnToShelvingCart and
InProcessingToShelvingCart preferences. The update statement should
insert values that replciate these functions. Note existing
functionality of all items in PROC location being returned to
permanent_location is preserved by default. Also, any items issued from
CART location will be returned to their permanent location on issue (if
it differs)
Special values for this pref are:
_ALL_ - used on left side only to affect all items
_BLANK_ - used on either side to match on/set to blank (actual blanks
will work, but this is an easier to read option)
_PERM_ - used on right side only to return items to permanent location
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Run updatedatabase.pl
3) Set the new system preference UpdateitemLocationOnCheckin
to the following (assuming sample data):
NEW: FIC
FIC: GEN
4) Create an item, set its location to NEW
5) Check in the item, note its location is now FIC
6) Check in the item again, note its location is now GEN
7) Check in the item again, note its location remains GEN
8) Test using _ALL_, _BLANK_ and _PERM_ for updates
9) Try entering various incorrect syntax in the pref and note you are warned
Sponsored by:
Arcadia Public Library (http://library.ci.arcadia.ca.us/)
Middletown Township Public Library (http://www.mtpl.org/)
Round Rock Public Library (https://www.roundrocktexas.gov/departments/library/)
Signed-off-by: Michal Denar <black23@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Liz Rea <wizzyrea@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
The condition in TooMany applied branch limits only if the rule didn't have a branchcode, this was wrong
To test:
1 - Find a title in the catalog, add 8 items, all of a single itemtype, 4 for branch A, four for branch B
2 - Remove any specific circ rules
3 - Set a default circ rule for the itemtype used above, limiting the max issue quantity to 3
4 - Find a patron and checkout the items from branch A
5 - You should be allowed to checkout 3, but the fourth should trigger 'too many'
6 - Now checkout the items from branch B, again you can checkout 3 and not four
7 - Apply this patch
8 - Assuming you have 6 items out now, try one from either branch, you should trigger 'too many' and have 6
9 - Return two from branch B and one from branch A
10 - Now you have three items issued total
11 - An item from either branch should be refused now
12 - Test with different values of 'CircControl' and confirm your expectations are met
Signed-off-by: Liz Rea <wizzyrea@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Some libraries don't want to force the librarians to manually confirm
each checkout when the item is checked out to another. Instead, they
would prefer to be alerted after the fact.
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Run updatedatabase.pl
3) Enable the new syspref AutoReturnCheckedOutItems
4) Check an item out to a patron
5) Check the same item out to another patron
6) Note you are not prompted to confirm the checkout,
but are instead alerted that is had been checked out to another patron!
Signed-off-by: Christopher Brannon <cbrannon@cdalibrary.org>
Signed-off-by: BWS Sandboxes <ByWaterSandboxes@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Liz Rea <wizzyrea@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch removes the hardcoded untranslatable string
'Lost item' from C4/Circulation.pm.
To test:
1) Make sure the system preference WhenLostChargeReplacementFee is set to Charge
2) Optional: in Administration > Item types, add a default replacement cost to
the item type you plan to use
3) Loan an item out to a patron
(If there is no default replacement cost, make sure the item has a replacement
price)
4) In the patron's account > Details > Loans, click on the item's barcode
5) Set the lost status to Lost
6) Go back to the patron's account > Fines
7) Notice it is written 'Lost item , Lost item title barcode (title)'
8) If you have another language installed, switch to the other language
and notice the second Lost item is still in English
9) Apply the patch
10) Redo steps 3-6
11) Notice it is written 'Lost item, title barcode (title)'
12) Optional: switch to another language, notice there is no English string
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
We missed a change in calling parameters passed to CalcDateDue in AddRenewal
during the initial QAing. This patch corrects the call and adds a test to catch
regressions.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Dobrica Pavlinusic <dpavlin@rot13.org>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch adds the 'interface' field to the accountlines table and
updates all Koha::Object routines and calls to use it.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
I went back over 12 years to and still only found "FIXME: What are these
accounttypes" concerning the 'O' type and I couldn't find anywhere where
it was being set.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
A series of ternaries were introduced when we moved to add_debit which
defaulted to 'user 0' should a userenv not be set. This was incorrect
as userenv may well not be set (during cronscript runs for example) and
the new constraint would not allow such a default. We switch to 'undef'
here to satisfy the constraint.
Test plan
1) Ensure you have data in your system that would be caught by the
longoverdues cronjob.
2) Ensure you're sysprefs are setup to charge for lost items
3) Run the script and varify it runs to completion without errors
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Test plan:
1) Play with fines, should work OK
2) Try to print receipts on fines - prinfeercpt.pl, printinvoice.pl
3) git grep getnextacctno -> no occurences
4) git grep accountno should return only:
installer/data/mysql/atomicupdate/bug_21683_remove_column_accountno.perl
installer/data/mysql/update22to30.pl
misc/release_notes/release_notes_3_10_0.txt
misc/release_notes/release_notes_3_22_0.txt
5) prove
t/db_dependent/Accounts.t
t/db_dependent/ILSDI_Services.t
t/db_dependent/Stats.t
t/db_dependent/Koha/Account.t
Rescued-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
We were passing around possibly undefined $return_date variables from
AddReturn and then instantiating a new DateTime object as a default for
each routine. This followup sets the default higher up the stack within
AddReturn which provider clearer logic and a small performance
improvment.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
The automatic rebase after bug 21206 required a helping hand.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch updates the tests the ensure we do not double charge for
renewals that take place before the original due date and fixes the
corresponding loging in C4::Circulation::AddRenewal.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Martin Renvoize
Frédéric Demians
Nick Clemens
Agustin Moyano
Jonathan Druart
Lari Taskula
Tomas Cohen Arazi
Kyle M Hall
Andrew Isherwood
Christopher Brannon
Jesse Weaver
Fridolin Somers
Caroline Cyr La Rose
Josef Moravec