Test plan:
1) Create a patron
2) In koha/members/moremember.pl add a manual restriction, with comment foobar
3) try to checkout, you have a message like
Restricted: Patron's account is restricted with the explanation:
foobar
4) Got to Edit patron, save
5) try to checkout, foobar is no more
Restricted: Patron's account is restricted with the explanation:
6) Apply patch
7) Redo 1-4
8) try to checkout, foobar is there.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Katariina Hanhisalo <katariina.hanhisalo@xamk.fi>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
(cherry picked from commit 3b9f1e1560)
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
(cherry picked from commit 1d1e123fe3)
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Currently the itemnumber is not passed through when paying a single fine,
we should do that
To test:
1 - Create a manual debit and provide a barcode so the debit is linked to an item
2 - Go to the 'Make a payment' tab. Click the 'Writeoff' button on the individual line
3 - View the 'Transactions tab' The writeoff has no item details
4 - Apply patch
5 - Repeat 1 & 2
6 - View the transactions tab. The writeoff shows item details
7 - Confirm 'Writeoff amount' and 'Writeoff selected' still work and do not link to item
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
(cherry picked from commit ddad57a468)
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
(cherry picked from commit 6b64f2fe1f)
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
We should remove all SQL queries that contain 0000-00-00 and finally
assume we do not longer have such value in our DB (for date type)
We already dealt with such values in previous update DB entries.
The 2 added by this one haven't been replaced already.
The code will now assume that either a valid date exist, or NULL/undef.
Test plan:
QA review is needed and test of the different places where code is
modified.
Not sure about the change from reports/issues_avg_stats.pl
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Otherwise you mess with the following hash elements :)
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
(cherry picked from commit e9195d166e)
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
(cherry picked from commit 206b2c780e)
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch adds sorting on class code for the patrons attributes forms
on the memberentry page.
Test plan
1) Create a couple of different patron attributes
2) Go to the patron add page
3) Note the order in which the patron attributes load at the bottom of
the page.
4) Reload the page and note the order of those attribues may change (if
it doesn't, try reloading again.. it's random)
5) Apply the patch
6) Reload the page a few times and confirm the attributes are now
ordered.
7) Signoff
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
(cherry picked from commit 0821a5890d)
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
(cherry picked from commit 2261dad896)
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
We introduced a bug in the patron attribute forms with bug 5161.
Test plan
1/ Create two PA_CLASS authorized values
2/ Create two corresponding patron attribute types referencing the above
classes.
3/ Edit a patron, both attributes should appear within their own
fieldsets at the bottom of the member entry form.
4/ Set a value for the first of the two patron attributes and save
5/ Edit the patron again, note that the first attribute no longer
resides within it's own fieldset
6/ Apply the patch
7/ Edit the patron again, note that the first attribute now resides
inside it's own fieldset again
8/ Signoff
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
(cherry picked from commit 08396d4b2f)
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
(cherry picked from commit 2cb36767ad)
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Whilst working on this bug I found a weird inconsistent variable assignment line
Signed-off-by: Sally <sally.healey@cheshiresharedservices.gov.uk>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
JD: Amended commit message: fix bug number
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
During work on bug 26076 a variable scope mistake was made when
reverting the logic to use distinct queries for selected accountlines.
This patch restores the script scope of the varaible by removing the
superflous 'my' declaration.
Test plan
1/ Add a set of manual invoices
2/ Select a subset of those manual invoices to 'Writeoff selected'
3/ Confirm that only those selected invoices have been written off.
Signed-off-by: Sally <sally.healey@cheshiresharedservices.gov.uk>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
To test:
1) In staff interface open up a patron record
2) Click More -> Delete, and then "Yes, delete"
3) Notice 500 error
4) Apply patch
5) Notice error is now gone when deleting
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
(cherry picked from commit 08c34b33e4)
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
(cherry picked from commit ccfd83fffa)
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
(cherry picked from commit 1e37d9c5f7)
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Right now it's possible to delete the anonymous patron at any time. When this happens the system will break just as if anonymouspatron was unset but patrons still have an "always anonymize" privacy setting.
This issue occurs more frequently than one would expect.
We should make it so that the patron set in AnonymousPatron is not deletable.
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Set a patron to by AnonymousPatron
3) Attempt to delete that patron from the members toolbar
4) Note the error message!
Signed-off-by: Devinim <kohadevinim@devinim.com.tr>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
(cherry picked from commit c1af56eb54)
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
The behaviour of the syspref FinePaymentAutoPopup is broken, the popup
explodes with
Can't call method "unblessed" on an undefined value at /home/vagrant/kohaclone/members/printfeercpt.pl line 64
It has been broken by
commit a2449a81be
Bug 23051: (follow-up) Add renewal feedback and move code to subroutines and test
which modified the return value of Koha::Account->pay (from $payment_id
to a hashref)
Test plan:
- To test activate FinePaymentAutoPopup
- Create a manual fee
- Write it off using the write off button on the account line (not below table)
=> Without the patch you get the error
=> With the patch applied the popup is correctly displayed
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
(cherry picked from commit 42c0475a94)
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
(cherry picked from commit c9887a8753)
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
This appears to be a bug due to inaccuracies in floating point math. I've been unable to reproduce it on demand. Sometimes when using the "Write off selected" button, Koha will give the error that the payment is more than the amount owed, even though they are the same. The solution I've implemented is to move the summation from Perl code to the database query. This video demonstrates the issue and afterward, shows the error goes away after the patch is applied: https://monosnap.com/file/pG69HC7iI9mU9kkuoCtbkVzVTffKlE
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Restart all the things!
3) Verify that "Write off selected" functions as usual
Signed-off-by: Amit Gupta <amit.gupta@informaticsglobal.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
(cherry picked from commit 6441296903)
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
It defaults to 0 in get_template_and_user
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
(cherry picked from commit 79f7a3fc024323d8b4016d201a222118801bdcc6)
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
(cherry picked from commit 3e213d65860ab4fcb6a425244729ac4a9fe8c19f)
This patchset prevents a non-superlibrarian user from editing a
superlibrarians email address via memberentry. This is to prevent a
privilege escalation vulnerability whereby a user could update a
superlibrarians contact details to match their own and then request a
password reset via the OPAC.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
(cherry picked from commit e4fdbd69722ee33fb0e7125f9a1b316e7f9f8b02)
When a user creates a patron's guarantor on /cgi-bin/koha/members/memberentry.pl but doesn't select the relationship from a dropdown, the relationship defaults to first value, which in default sysprefs is "father". This may or may not be correct as this is not a conscious choice from the user.
The solution is to make the "Relationship" field mandatory when there is no empty entry in the system preferences, always starting with an empty option but not allowing the user to save an empty entry.
And if there is an empty option in sysprefs, it allows to save empty, as well as makes it default choice.
To reproduce with default system preferences:
1) Create a new patron who is assumed to have a guarantor or modify the existing one.
2) Under "Guarantor Information" click on "Search to add" button. After performing the search, select a user to act as guarantor. Don't use the dropdown menu to select a relationship. Save your changes.
3) Observe that relationship is set as "father".
4) Apply the patch.
5) Repeat steps 1 and 2.
6) Observe that it doesn't allow you to save the form until you pick a relationship type.
To reproduce with empty entry added to system preferences:
1) Add an empty entry to borrowerRelationship at /cgi-bin/koha/admin/preferences.pl?tab=patrons in Patron relationships section (example: "|father|mother").
2) Create a new patron who is assumed to have a guarantor or modify the existing one.
3) Under "Guarantor Information" click on "Search to add" button. After performing the search, select a user to act as guarantor. Don't use the dropdown menu to select a relationship. Save your changes.
4) Observe that relationship is set as "father".
5) Apply the patch.
6) Repeat steps 1, 2 and 3.
7) Observe when you save the empty entry it does set the relationship as empty.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Alex Arnaud <alex.arnaud@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
(cherry picked from commit 029f41a667)
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
To test:
- Add a credit to the patron's account
- Make sure they got a pending suggestion
- Try to delete
- Verify you notes for both as list items
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
(cherry picked from commit 21cde7bd2f)
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
Test plan:
From the OPAC, add a suggestion
From the staff interface, try to delete the patron who created the
suggestion
=> You get a warning message
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
(cherry picked from commit 85c1537bd7)
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
TEST PLAN:
1. Have a fine on a Patron's account.
2. Choose the "Write off Selected" button
3. Enter an amount less than the amount owed by the patron.
4. Koha will give a yellow box with a note "You must collect a value
greater than or equal to 2.00." The $2.00 is the amount that is
attempted to write off (the amount less than the amount owed).
5. Apply patch
6. Again try to writeoff an amount less than the amount owed.
7. You should be able to write it off.
8. Try paying an amount more than owed, you should still get an
error. You shouldn't be able to write off more than the amount.
9. Follow the above steps via 'Pay selected' as aposed to 'Writeoff
selected'.
10. You should not be able to 'Tender' less than the amount you have
'Paid'.
11. Disable Javascript and run through all the above steps. You should
still be blocked where relevant.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
(cherry picked from commit bbac95d9fb)
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
Same as the precedent patch for patron's modification
Test plan is identical but with an existing patron
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This is still not ideal but brings a bit of enhancement.
One possible problem is that the patron creation will fail if the
streetnumber field is too long (borrowers.streetnumber is varchar(10).
Test plan:
0. Don't apply this patch
1. Create a new patron with a streetnumber longer than 10 characters
2. Save
=> The patron has not been created and the app explodes
The error is about extended_attributes and not meaningful
Can't call method "extended_attributes" on an undefined value at /kohadevbox/koha/members/memberentry.pl line 560
3. Apply the patch
4. Repeat 1. and 2
=> You get a warning on the interface and you still see the creation
form
5. Check the logs
=> The error is meaningful
"Data too long for column 'streetnumber'"
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
When a patron is added or modified and a warning appears (duplicate,
inconsistent data, etc.) the form lost the patron's attributes.
Test plan:
Create some attribute types for patrons
Create a new patron, use an userid that already exists and fill the attributes
=> You get a warning and the attributes are kept
Modify the userid and save again
Edit the same patron
Modify the attributes, as well as the userid (to get the duplicate warning)
=> You get a warning and the attributes are kept with the modified
values
Modify the userid and save again
=> The new values are saved
Edit the attributes from the detail page (so not with the full edit form)
Modify them and save
=> The new values are saved
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
We should use Koha::DateUtils instead of Date::Time directly
This patch simplay replaces calls to now() with a call to dt_from_string()
which does effectively the same thing.
Probably reading the code and verifying changes is sufficient but...
To test:
1 - confirm the files all compile
2 - confirm all tests pass
3 - confirm Koha still works
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Librarians should be able to define what sections in member entryfields in 'Main address',
'Contact' and 'Alternate contact' in member entry form for guarantee's are pre-filled from guarantor's record
The 'Guarantor surname, 'Guarantor first name' and 'relationship' fields
in the 'Contact' section should not be filled from guarantor patron
record as those fields are intended for guarantor's without patron
records in Koha.
Test plan:
1. On an adult patron's record (which has all fields filled out in the
'Main address', 'Contact' (Except for 'Guarantor surname', 'Guarantor
first name', and 'relationship'), 'Alternate address', and 'Alternate contact') select 'Add guarantee'
2. Observe:
* Fields in 'Main address' are all automatically pre-filled
from guarantor record
* Fields in 'Contact' (except 'Guarantor surname', 'Guarantor firstname'
and 'relationship') are all automatically pre-filled from guarantor
record
* Fields in 'Alternate address' (except for Contact note) are pre-filled from guarantor record
* None of the fields in 'Alternate contact' are pre-filled from guarantor
4. Apply patch
5. Run database updates
cd installer/data/mysql
sudo koha-shell <instancename>
./updatedatabase.pl
6. Restart plack:
sudo koha-plack --restart <instancename>
7. Go to Administration > Global system preferences and search for the
new PrefillGuaranteeField system preference
8. Observe this syspref contains checkboxes and the following are
selected by default:
Contact - Primary email
Contact - Primary phone
Main address - Address
Main address - City
Main address - Country
Main address - State
Main address - ZIP/Postal code
Main address - street number
Please note: 'Contact - Guarantor surname', 'Contact - Guarantor first
name', Contact - relationship' are not in PrefillGuaranteeField syspref
as they are for non Koha patrons and so should not be pre-filled from a Koha
patron.
9. Repeat step 1 and observe the following fields are prefilled from guarantor:
In Main address section -
streetnumber
address
city
state
zipcode/postal code
country
In Contact section -
Primary phone
Primary email
10. In the PrefillGuaranteeField syspref click '[Select all]' checkboxes
11. Repeat step 1 and observe all fields in 'Main address', 'Contact'
(except Guarantor surname, Guarantor first name, and relationship),
Alternate address and Alterate contact are filled from guarantor record.
i.e. The values in guarantor's 'Alternate address' fields fill the
guarantee's 'Alternate address' fields
12. Change a few of the prefilled field values and 'Save' and observe your changes
have been saved in addition to the unaltered pre-filled values in other
fields
13. Amend PrefillGuarantee field syspref to have no checkboxes selected
14. Repeat step 1 and observe none of the fields in Main address,
Contact, Alternate address and Alternate contact are pre-filled
15. Run tests:
sudo koha-shell <instancename>
prove xt
prove t
Sponsored-by: Waitaki Distict Council, NZ
Signed-off-by: Sally <sally.healey@cheshiresharedservices.go.uk>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
To test:
1 - Verify on staff side that patron can be edited to opt in our out of auto renewal
2 - Check out some items to a patron opted in to auto renewal
3 - Ensure the items are checked out and set to autorenew
4 - Login on the opac at the patron
5 - Verify items cannot be renewed as scheduled for auto-renewal
6 - On staff side, opt patron out of auto renewal
7 - Verify on opac items are no longer marked for auto renewal
8 - Run the auto renewal cron job, items are not renewed
9 - Set 'no renewal before' to a setting that would prevent renewal
10 - Verify that opting patron in or out of auto renewal changes only the reason items cannot be renewed
11 - Set 'no renewal before' to a setting that would allow for renewal
12 - Verify that opting patron in/out changes their ability to renew
13 - Verify that when opted out cron does not renew
14 - Verify that when opted in the item is auto renewed
15 - Reset the due date, opt out, verify manual renewal succeeds
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Dealt with that previously in the module during the rebase.
It conflicted with bug 23281.
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
We do no longer need this package, we can use
Koha::Patron::Attribute::Types directly instead.
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
We can then now start to move methods from C4::Members::AttributeTypes
as well.
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
There is already a method in Koha::Patron::Attribute to check the
uniqueness constraint, let us it to replace CheckUniqueness
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch replace Koha::Patron->get_extended_attributes with
->extended_attributes
It's now a getter a setter method.
It permits to replace UpdateBorrowerAttribute and use
create_related from DBIx::Class
Notes:
* We face the same variable names difference than in a previous patch
(value vs attribute)
Bug 20443: Remove SetBorrowerAttributes
squash + RM get_extended_attributes
RM get_extended_attributes
SQUASH Bug 20443: Remove UpdateBorrowerAttribute and SetBorrowerAttribute
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
The GetBorrowerAttributes subroutine return the attributes for a given
patron.
Using get_extended_attributes we can acchieve it easily. The problematic
here is to restore the method's name (value vs attribute,
value_description vs description of the authorised value, as well as
display_checkout that should not be a method of Attribute, but
Attribute::Type instead)
value_description was used when the attribute types were attached to an
authorised value category. To avoid the necessary test in template and
controller there is now a $attribute->description method that will
display either the attribute's value OR the value of the authorised
value when needed. We should certainly use this one from few other
places.
Notes:
* This patch rename Koha::Patron->attributes with Koha::Patron->get_extended_attributes.
It will be renamed with Koha::Patron->extended_attributes in ones of the next
patches when it will become a setter as well.
* GetBorrowerAttributes did not care about the library limits, we still
do not
* The opac_only flag was not used outside of test, we drop it off.
* To maintain the existing behavior we add a default order-by clause to
the search method [code, attribute]
* From C4::Letters::_parseletter we always display the staff description
of the AV, There is now a FIXME to warn about it
* FIXMEs are not regressions, existing behaviors must be kept
* TODO add a new check to bug 21010 to search for inconsistencies in
patron's attributes attached to non-existent authorised values
* One test has been updated in Modifications.t, order_by is now
by default set to ['code', 'attribute']
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Bug 14570 removed the guarantor pre-fill functionality when selecting
'Add guarantee' to an Adult patron. This is because guarantor
information would now only display if (1) the patron record exists
(which it won't when first adding guarantee to guarantor record) and (2)
if there is already a guarantor added to a guarantee
This patchfix will pre-fill guarantor fields and address fields (so the guarantee
has the same address as the guarantor) if no relationship (existing
guarantor data exists) and a guarantor_id is handed to memberenty.pl in
URL when clicking 'Add guarantee' button on Adults patron record.
Test plan:
1. Add adult patron make sure to fill in their 'Main address' details
2. Select 'Add guarantee'
3. Observe no details of the adult patron are displaying in the
'Guarantor information' section or 'Main address' sections of memberentry.pl
4. Select 'Search to add', search for your adult patron and choose
'Select' to add them as guarantor
5. Fill out rest of memberentry.pl and 'Save'
6. Observe adult is showing as the guarantor
7. Apply patch
8. Run tests:
sudo koha-shell <instancename>
prove xt
prove t
9. Confirm tests pass
10. Return to your adult patron
11. Select 'Add guarantee'
12. Observe in 'Guarantor information' and 'Main address' sections of
memberentry.pl are pre-filled with the 'patron #' (borrowernumber),
surname, firstname and street number, address, address2 (if you
filled that in on adults account), city
13. Fill out the rest of memberenty.pl and save and confirm your adult
patron is showing as the guarantor and the pre-filled address details
have been saved and are showing
14. Repeat steps 10,11 and 12 and in the 'Guarantor information' select
'Search to add' and add another adult as guarantor
15. Fill out the rest of memberentry.pl and 'Save' and notice with this
patch applied you can still add multiple guarantors successfully
Sponsored-by: South Taranaki District Council, NZ
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: George Veranis <gveranis@dataly.gr>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Rebasing was a nightmare, so I'm squashing the sign off follow-ups to
ease the pain with any future rebases
Includes:
Bug 23051: (follow-up) Refactor renewal code
As per Nick's first point in comment #20, the code that tests for
renewability and renews items has been refactored into it's own
function.
Bug 23051: (follow-up) Provide feedback
For renewals that fail when a fine is being paid off, this patch causes
any errors to be passed back to the template for display.
Addresses the second point in Nick's comment #20
Bug 23051: (follow-up) Fix unit tests
As raised by Nick in comment #35
Bug 23051: (follow-up) Fix/improve feedback
This follow up patch addresses the following parts of Nick's feedback in
comment #35:
- it would be nice to get feedback on what was successfully renewed as well
- In general I think I would prefer to see 'ok' and 'not_ok' returned as
a single 'renewal_results' array
- There is no listing of errors if I use the 'pay' button on an
individual fine
Bug 23051: (follow-up) Refactor methods
This follow up patch addresses the following parts of Nick's feedback in
comment #35:
- I don't really like that the functions are internal functions and then
exported
- I think the pref description should highlight that if 'RenewalPeriodBase'
is set to due date, there may be doubled charges
Bug 23051: (follow-up) Add SIP summary
This follow up patch addresses the following parts of Nick's feedback in
comment #35:
- Ideally SIP would get feedback in a screen message
Bug 23051: (follow-up) Renewing in OPAC
This follow up patch addresses the following parts of Nick's feedback in
comment #35:
- I am also not sure about the code path if a patron paid fines on the
opac (via paypal etc.) but renewals are not allowed on the opac.
We've introduced the syspref RenewAccruingItemInOpac (default is off)
which, when enabled, will cause items attached to fines that are paid
off in the OPAC (via payment plugins), to be automatically renewed.
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch adds the ability to apply discounts to existing patron
charges from the boraccount page.
Test plan
1/ Carry out some accounting actions that end up with debts on the
patron record. (Add a manual invoice for example)
2/ Note a new 'Apply discount' action button on the unpaid debt
3/ Paid debts do not display the action button
4/ Click the button
5/ Enter an amount into the resulting modal and click confirm
6/ Confirm that the outstanding debt has been reduced by the amount you
specified.
7/ Confirm that a new 'Discount' line appears on the patrons account
8/ Confirm that in the 'details' view of the debt that the discount line
was used against the debt to create the reduction.
9/ Signoff
Signed-off-by: Michal Denar <black23@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Coming from
commit 51aa6db46c
Bug 12001: Move GetMemberAccountRecords to the Koha namespace
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Bug 9978 should have fixed them all, but some were missing.
We want all the license statements part of Koha to be identical, and
using the GPLv3 statement.
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch adds some additional handling to prevent undercollection of
fees at the server side.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
It is the same as for debit types.
It adds a new column `archived` in table `account_credit_types` that has
the same purpose than `account_debit_types.archived`
Test plan:
0. Apply patch && run updatedatabase && update_dbix_class_files
1. Go to Admin » Credit types
2. Add a new credit type, give it a code and a description and check
'Can be manually added'
3. Go to a patron's accounting section, 'Create manual credit' tab
4. Verify that the new credit type appears
5. Return to Admin » Credit types and archive the credit type
6. Verify that the new credit type is not available anymore in 'Create
manual credit'
7. Restore the credit type and verify that it is available again
8. Create a manual credit with the new credit type
9. Go to Reports » Cash register and make sure you can find the
transaction by filtering on transaction type
10. Edit the new credit type and set some library limitations, make sure
that the credit type doesn't appear if you're connected to a library
you didn't selected, and that it appears if you're connected to a
library you selected.
Note to QA team:
The change in Koha/Account.pm, I added it because otherwise Koha died
when adding a manual credit with a custom type.
In that case, offset type will default to 'Manual Credit'. I'm not sure
if that is the best thing to do. I'm open to suggestions :)
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Test plan:
1. Create manual invoice for any patron and click on "Save", you should
be redirected to Account tab
2. Create manual invoice for any patron and click on "Save and pay", you
should be redirected to Account tab
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Bug 11911 replaced the permission of suggestions.pl (create a purchase
suggestion) from catalogue => 1 to acquisition => 'suggestions_manage'.
However we have a lot of acquisition scripts that have lax permissions
(acquisition => '*' which means any sub permissions of acquisition is
enough).
That causes problem when a circulation staff can create purchase
suggestions but not access acquisition information.
One solution is to move the suggestions_manage subpermission out of the
acquisition permission and create a new suggestion permission.
Test plan:
0. Setup
* Create a patron with several permission (and full acquisition
permission)
* Create another patron with several permission, and suggestions_manage
permission
* Create another patron without the suggestions_manage permission
1. Apply the patch and execute the update database entry
2. Note that the third patron you create still does not have
suggestions_manage
3. Confirm that you can create a purchase suggestion if you have
suggestions_manage, but cannot access acquisition pages if you do not
have any subpermissions of the acquisition permission
Signed-off-by: Hayley Mapley <hayleymapley@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
and remove 'scalar' keyword in calls where it's not needed.
Signed-off-by: Brendan Gallagher <brendan@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
So far nothing is displayed if a librarian removes patron with
outstanding credits.
Note that outstanding debits blocks the deletion.
Test plan:
- Create a patron with outstanding credit
- Create a patron with outstanding debits
- Delete the 2 patrons
=> With credit - You get a warning but do not block the deletion
=> With debits - You get a warning message that blocks the deletion
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Didier Gautheron
Nick Clemens
Jonathan Druart
Martin Renvoize
Joonas Kylmälä
Kyle M Hall
Petro Vashchuk
Katrin Fischer
Alex Buckley
Andrew Isherwood
Nazlı Çetin
Julian Maurice