Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
This commit is generated using:
% perl misc/devel/tidy.pl
*within* ktd, to get the same version of perltidy than what will be used
by our CI (currently v20230309).
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
This will make it so if acquisition_source is of an existing vendor_id, it'll show the vendor name instead of the id.
If it's not of an existing vendor_id, show the raw value instead.
I'm not 100% happy with this patch as it adds an edge case to Item::strings_map but I believe the only alternative
is to make 952$e Source of acquisition an AV field in the default framework.
Not only that, but this would have to be an AV field of type 'vendors' that'd have to allow to pick from existing vendors (similar to current 'branches').
The above is a ton more work than initial suggestions would imply.
Happy to be proven wrong (in fact, hoping I am).
This is compatible with main Koha only, not backportable to 23.11
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
In some cases, we may want to update an AccountLine that is linked to a
checkout without knowing whether it is a current or old checkout. In
these cases, use the AccountLines ->checkout accessor to ensure we get
the issue_id correctly, regardless of whether it is a current issue or
and old_issue.
This also applies when generating a new AccountLine based on an existing
AccountLine (for example, adding a credit to refund a previously charged
fine)
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
This patch removes the last remaining use of updateWrongTransfer and the
method itself.
We replace it with a call to request_transfer that passes the 'replace'
reason of 'WrongTransfer' through to Koha::Item::Transfer->cancel.
Test plan
1/ git grep updateWrongTransfer to confirm there are no more uses of the
method.
2/ Confirm an incorrect transfer still behaves as expected at
circulation returns.
Signed-off-by: Paul Derscheid <paul.derscheid@lmscloud.de>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
"Use of uninitialized value in string eq"
Test plan:
prove t/db_dependent/Koha/Item.t
should return green
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Edit: tidied the tests (tcohen)
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
We should store deleted objects as diffs just as we do for modification and item created.
This enhancement will store modification diffs if the action is set to DELETE, and an "original" object is passed in.
Test Plan:
1) Enable CataloguingLog
2) Deletee an item
3) Query the database for the newest action log:
select * from action_logs order by action_id desc limit 1\G
4) Note the diff column is NULL
5) Apply this patch
6) Restart all the things!
7) Delete another item
8) Query the database again
9) Note the diff has been created!
Signed-off-by: Sukhmandeep Benipal <sukhmandeep.benipal@inLibro.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
We should store newly created objects as diffs just as we do for modifications.
This enhancement will store modification diffs if the action is set to ADD or CREATE and an "original" object is passed in.
Test Plan:
1) Enable CataloguingLog
2) Create an item
3) Query the database for the newest action log:
select * from action_logs order by action_id desc limit 1\G
4) Note the diff column is NULL
5) Apply this patch
6) Restart all the things!
7) Create another item
8) Query the database again
9) Note the diff has been created!
Signed-off-by: Sukhmandeep Benipal <sukhmandeep.benipal@inLibro.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
When modifying bibliographic record, Koha records in the log the
original version of the record. This allows one to see what has been
changed in the record.
However, in case of item modification Koha records in the log the the
current version of the item (i.e. the version after the edit). This is
inconsistent with the biblio modification behavior and makes it
difficult or even impossible to trace changes (especially in case of the
first modif since the initial version is not being recorded).
This patch makes the item modification logging feature work similarly to
logging modifications in bibliographic records.
Test plan:
==========
1. With CataloguingLog enabled (default in ktd) make a modification of
an item.
2. Check the Modification log. You should see as the recorded version
the version of the item after the modification.
3. Apply the patch; restart_all.
4. Repeat p. 1.
5. In the Modification log you should see now the version of the item
that existed before the recent modification.
Sponsored-by: Ignatianum University in Cracow
Signed-off-by: Roman Dolny <roman.dolny@jezuici.pl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
To test:
1. Apply patch and restart_all, and yarn api:bundle
2. Check the items endpoint for items.stack ( http://localhost:8081/api/v1/items/144 )
3. The data is there, and correct.
Signed-off-by: Paul Derscheid <paul.derscheid@lmscloud.de>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
The API wasn't including the effective_bookable value in responses
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Derscheid <paul.derscheid@lmscloud.de>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
This patch updates the bookable nature of items to allow setting at the
itemtype level and then overriding that setting at item level should you
so wish to do so.
We also now properly handle the item_level-itypes preference such that
we look at item or biblioitem level appropriately.
Signed-off-by: Esther <esther@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Derscheid <paul.derscheid@lmscloud.de>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
We need to also exclude cancelled bookings from the find_booking routine
used at checkout.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
We need to ensure we handle the new status tracking cancelled/completed
in our clash detection code too.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
This patch allows the return claims endpoint to handle the refunding of a lost fee for the item if the checkbox is checked
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
Test plan:
1) Apply patch and reset_all
2) Checkout an item to a patron
3) Mark that item as lost
4) Add a manual invoice for that item's barcode to the patron's account
5) Pay that fine in the Make a payment tab
6) In system preferences, search for NoRefundOnLostFinesPaidAge
7) Set this to -1. I use this value here to avoid needing to go into the database to change the date of the payment we made in step 5. Any fines older than -1 days (i.e. all fines) will be caught by the syspref which is what we want to test)
8) Check in the item
9) The check in message should display "Any lost item fees for this item will remain on the patron's account."
10) Navigate to the Patron's account and confirm that no credit has been added and that the lost fee has therefore not been refunded
11) Run unit test: prove t/db_dependent/Circulation.t
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste Henry <andrewfh@dubcolib.org>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
This patch reverts the change to request_transfer, opting to tackle the
StockRotationAdvance requirement to stay in place in ModItemTransfer
itself.
We also add a FIXME to RotatingCollections.. I'll look to removing that
on another bug to reduce the scope of this one.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
1) Don't automagically always set a transfer to in transit on checkin..
wait for the user to actually confirm that's the case
2) New transfers triggered by a hold should take precidence, so hide
transfers for any other reason from display
3) Update get_transfer and get_transfers to ensure ordering isn't lost
when prefetch is used and add tests for this
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
ModItemTransfer is still very heavy handed and outright overrules
existing transfers in the queue.
For StockrotationAdvance transfers it's important that they remain in
the queue to get actioned later, even if a higher precident transfer is
actions in the interim.
This patch adds a clause to the cancellation call within
request_transfer such that StockrationAdvance transfers are left in tact
for the next time the item is checked in.
Test plan
1) Item is added to stock rotation
2) The cronjob creates a 'StockRotationAdvance' transfer
3) The item is checked in, which initiates the transfer, however, a hold is triggered
4) The hold is confirmed, which replaces the StockRotationAdvance
5) The item is checked out
6) The item is checked in, which initiates the transfer again
7) The item is checked in at it's destination and the StockrotationAdvance transfer
has the proper date arrived date set.
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This adds a unit test for the new preparation_period handling introduced
into the find_booking method of Koha::Item.
Sponsored-by: Cuyahoga County Public Library <https://cuyahogalibrary.org/>
Signed-off-by: Paul Derscheid <paul.derscheid@lmscloud.de>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
This patch ensures we catch checkouts that would interfer with the
preparation period set for an existing booking by adding said period to
the bookings search.
We also reduce the proposed due date for the checkout to be confirmed by
the preparation period for the item.
Test plan
1) Set a booking preparation period for an itemtype
2) Add a booking for an item with that itemtype to fall beyond the due
date that the item would be assigned if you were to check it out now
to your test user, but within the number of days you've set for your
preparation period.
3) Attempt to check the item out to your test user.
4) Note that we catch the booking and warn and that the latest return
date suggested take the preparation period into account.
Sponsored-by: Cuyahoga County Public Library <https://cuyahogalibrary.org/>
Signed-off-by: Kristi Krueger <KKRUEGER@cuyahogalibrary.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul Derscheid <paul.derscheid@lmscloud.de>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
To test:
1) Make sure the following tests pass:
- t/db_dependent/Koha/Item.t
- t/db_dependent/Koha/Biblios.t
- db_dependent/Koha/Biblio.t
Sponsored-by: Gothenburg University Library
Signed-off-by: Matt Blenkinsop <matt.blenkinsop@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This bug adds a new system preference 'z3950Status' which takes a yaml block and marks any items matching
the conditions as unavailable via z3950 results
It obeys the existing z3950 extra fields, adding item ststus to field $k
To test:
0 - Apply patch, update database
1 - Setup your koha to use itself as a z39 source in Administration/Z3950/SRU servers:
host: localhost
port 2100
database: biblios
syntax: MARC21 (or UNIMARC if applicable)
2 - Uncomment the config line in /etc/koha/sites/kohadev/z3950/config.xml
Also make sure to remove the backslashes escaping the hyphens
3 - Restart all
4 - Cataloging - New from Z3950
5 - Search your records, view the marc to confirm status subfield $k is included
6 - Add items to a record with various statuses (lost,damaged,withdrawn) and itemtypes
7 - Edit syspref AdditionalFieldsInZ3950ResultSearch o add 952$k
8 - Search for record above - confirm statuses show as expected
9 - Edit new syspref z3950Status - confirm the language of the pref makes sense
itype: [BK]
ccode: [REF]
10 - Search z39 again and confirm items and collection codes are marked 'SYSPREF' in $k
11 - Edit Authorized values - add category Z3950_STATUS
12 - Add authorized vlaue: SYSPREF with Description: System preferenced
13 - Restart all
14 - Search z39 again and confirm statuses show new description
Sponsored by: Northeast Kansas Library System <https://www.nekls.org>
Sponsored by: South East Kansas Library System <https://www.sekls.org>
Signed-off-by: Phil Ringnalda <phil@chetcolibrary.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch updates the method name to follow current conventions.
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch replaces the use of is_notforloan with not_for_loan and
removes the older is_notforloan method and tests
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch is simply here to prove that is_notforloan is just
not_for_loan but in a boolean context.. we'll remove it in the next
patch.
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Looks like a recent bug introduced a superflous warning, we just clean
that up here whilst we're in the code.
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
To test:
1.Add the following to MarcItemFieldsToOrder:
homebranch: 949$a
holdingbranch: 949$b
itype: 949$y
nonpublic_note: 949$x
public_note: 949$z
loc: 949$c
ccode: 949$8
notforloan: 949$7
uri: 949$u
copyno: 949$t
price: 949$g|949$j
replacementprice: 949$v
itemcallnumber: 949$o
quantity: 949$k
budget_code: 949$l
coded_location_qualifier: 949$f
enumchron: 949$h
2. Add the following to MarcFieldsToOrder:
price: 949$g
quantity: 949$k
budget_code: 949$l
discount: 949$m
sort1: 949$n
sort2: 949$q
3. Acquisitions > Find a vendor
4. Create a new basket -> Add to basket -> From new file
5. Use the file uplodaded in this bug report.
6. Set format to MARCXML and stage for import.
7. Add staged files to basket
8. Select all, make sure you add an item type, and choose 'Do not look for matching records'
9. Save and kaboom.
10. APPLY PATCH and restart_all
11. Follow the steps again, this time no kaboom.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
Bug 33568 introduced a lot of new simple accessors without providing unit tests for them.
Test plan:
All tests modified by this patch should pass
Note that one bug was found! Logic issue in lost/not lost
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
Silly typo!
Caught by a test
koha_1 | # Failed test 'Home branch code matches holdingbranch'
koha_1 | # at t/db_dependent/Items.t line 581.
koha_1 | # got: 'QHImNSEoNi'
koha_1 | # expected: 'VY5y6p'
koha_1 | # Looks like you failed 1 test of 7.
koha_1 |
koha_1 | # Failed test 'Koha::Item(s) tests'
koha_1 | # at t/db_dependent/Items.t line 588.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
QUESTION - Do we prefer this or a dropdown list in the column filter
header?
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Laurence Rault <laurence.rault@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Emily Lamancusa <emily.lamancusa@montgomerycountymd.gov>
Signed-off-by: Tomás Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
FIXME We cannot have the usual _count/+count pattern for the REST API, I
think it's acceptable
FIXME We lost the sort on this column, not a big deal IMO
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Laurence Rault <laurence.rault@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Emily Lamancusa <emily.lamancusa@montgomerycountymd.gov>
Signed-off-by: Tomás Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
FIXME We need tests here
FIXME/TODO - Isn't it possible to replace all this mess with the
following Koha::Item method and a new DBIC rs?
sub courses {
my ($self) = @_;
return Koha::Courses->search(
{ 'ci.itemnumber' => $self->itemnumber },
{ join => { course_reserves => 'ci' } }
);
}
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Laurence Rault <laurence.rault@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Emily Lamancusa <emily.lamancusa@montgomerycountymd.gov>
Signed-off-by: Tomás Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
FIXME We need tests here!
See the FIXME in the code, we are losing the ability to search on the status,
but this is really impossible to implement if we are not storing the
status (DB or search engine).
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Laurence Rault <laurence.rault@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Emily Lamancusa <emily.lamancusa@montgomerycountymd.gov>
Signed-off-by: Tomás Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
FIXME - we need tests, but I'd like to make sure there is no an easier
way to do this many to many things. Tomas?
Filter on the "Item group" column needs to be tested!
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Laurence Rault <laurence.rault@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Emily Lamancusa <emily.lamancusa@montgomerycountymd.gov>
Signed-off-by: Tomás Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
This patch adds a new system prefernce, RESTAPIRenewalBranch, analogous to the existing OpacRenewalBranch system preference.
The preference allows choosing how the renewal branch is recorded in the statistics table.
In order ot preserve existing behaviour, the default is to use the api user's branch.
To test:
1 - Checkout some items to a patron
2 - Add an API user account with circulation permissions and a different homebranch
3 - POST a renewal to: http://localhost:8080/api/v1/checkouts/{checkout_id}/renewal
4 - Check statistics table and confirm the api users branch was used
5 - Apply patches, restart all
6 - Repeat API renewal, confirm same branch used
7 - Change the RESTAPIRenewal syspref
8 - Repeat API renewal and confirm specified branch is used
9 - Confirm the syspref works for all settings
Signed-off-by: Brendan Lawlor <blawlor@clamsnet.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
These methods were introduced and used in an earlier iteration of the
code, they are no longer called from anywhere (the code in
Koha::Booking->store handles all cases instead) and thus I choose to
remove them rather than add unit tests for them.. They are simple
methods that could be re-introduced as required at a future date.
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>