Bug 19014 altered CanBookBeRenewed to return (auto_)too_soon over on_reserve
For cron purposes this is the correct behaviour.
For display purposes we wish to see on_reserve over too_soon
This patchset adds a switch to 'CanBookBeRenewed' to alter the priority of these statuses
To test:
1 - set NoRenewalBeforePrecision to date only
2 - set a circ rule to auto-renewal=yes, no renewal before=0, checkout period to 7 days
3 - check item out
4 - confirm item shows Scheduled For Automatic Renewal in issues table
5 - place a hold on the item for another patron
6 - reload issues table for patron 1, confirm checkout still shows "scheduled for automatic renewal" rather than "on hold"
7 - change No Renewal Before value to 7
8 - reload issues table for patron 1, confirm checkout now shows "on hold"
9 - Apply patch
10 - restart_all
11 - Reload the issues table - confirm 'on_hold' still shows
12 - Change No Renewal Before to 0
13 - Refresh issues table, still shows 'On hold'
14 - perl misc/cronjobs/automatic_renewals.pl -v
15 - Result shows 'auto_too_soon'
16 - prove -v t/db_dependent/Circulation.t
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Bob Bennhoff <bbennhoff@clicweb.org>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
When batch editing, 2 reindex calls are sent to ES/Zebra.
We can easily avoid that reusing the skip_modzebra_update (renamed skip_record_index)
Additionally we should only send one request for biblio, and we should
only do it if we succeed
As the whole batch mod is in a transaction it is possible to fail in which case
Zebra queue is reset, but ES indexes have already been set
In addition to the skip param this patchset moves Zebra and Elasticsearch calls to
Indexer modules and introduces a generic Koha::SearchEngine::Indexer so that we don't
need to check the engine when calling for index
The new index_records routine takes an array so that we can reduce the calls to
the ES server.
The index_records routine for Zebra loops over ModZebra to avoid affecting current behaviour
Test plan:
General tests, under both search engines:
1 - Add a biblio and confirm it is searchable
2 - Edit the biblio and confirm changes are searchable
3 - Add an item, confirm it is searchable
4 - Delete an item, confirm it is not searchable
5 - Delete a biblio, confirm it is not searchable
6 - Add an authority and confirm it is searchable
7 - Delete an authority and confirm it is not searchable
Batch mod tests, under both search engines
1 - Have a bib with several items, none marked 'not for loan'
2 - Do a staff search that returns this biblio
3 - Items show as available
4 - Click on title to go to details page
5 - Edit->Item in a batch
6 - Set the not for loan status for all items
7 - Repeat your search
8 - Items show as not for loan
9 - Test batch deleting items
a - Test with a list of items, not deleting bibs
b - Test with a list of items, deleting bibs if no items remain where all items are only item on a biblio:
SELECT MAX(barcode) FROM items GROUP BY biblionumber HAVING COUNT(barcode) IN (1)
c - Test with a list of items, deleting bibs if no items remain where some items are the only item on a biblio:
SELECT MAX(barcode) FROM items GROUP BY biblionumber HAVING COUNT(barcode) IN (1,2)
10 - Confirm records are update/deleted as appropriate
Signed-off-by: Bob Bennhoff <bbennhoff@clicweb.org>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch
* sets one check for reserves and another for old_reserves in
atomic update
* Adds a message below the checkbox and adds detail when a hold is non
priority
* Fixes issue when there are more than one hold, but the first is non
priority
* Adds test case for this last scenario
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch implements necesary code to implement non priority feature
To test:
1) Apply all patches.
2) Run updatedatabase.
3) Checkout a specific item for patron1.
4) Place a hold on the same item for patron2 (do not check non priority
hold checkbox).
5) Try to renew the item for patron1.
CHECK => in checkouts table, there is a message that the item could not
be renewed because there was a hold.
6) Cleanup all checkouts and holds.
7) repeat steps 3 to 5, but this time check the non priority checkbox.
SUCCESS => item was renewed
8) prove t/db_dependent/Holds.t
Signed-off-by: Lisette Scheer <lisettes@latahlibrary.org>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
After discussion with Martin we decided that it could be the correct way
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
It was not used
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This code was duplicated and we are going to need it.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Remove duplicated logic for searching circulation rules.
This can be replaced with get_effective_rules().
To test:
1. prove t/db_dependent/Circulation/GetHardDueDate.t
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
To test:
1 - Go to Circulation->Transfer
2 - Note your signed in branch
3 - Find an item from your branch and create a transfer to branch B
4 - Confirm the item is marked as held at your current branch and is being transferred to B
5 - Find an item from a third branch, branch C
6 - Transfer that item to brnach B
7 - Confirm the item is held at your current branch and is being transferred to B
8 - prove -v t/db_dependent/Circulation.t
9 - prove -v t/db_dependent/Koha/Items.t
10 - prove -v t/db_dependent/RotatingCollections.t
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Bug 26078: (follow-up) used validTransfer instead of checking WrongTransfer message
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
To test:
- Have 2+ branches
- Set your default return policy to Item returns to issuing library
- Find an item with holding branch of Branch A
- Set your library to Branch B
- Check item in
- Koha generates a transfer to Branch A. In doing so, it sets the item holding branch to Branch B
- Set your library to Branch A
- Check item in
- Koha generate a transfer to Branch B. In doing so, it sets the item holding branch to Branch A
- Set you library to Branch A
- Check the item in
. . . Repeat indefinitely.
Apply patch
Repeat
No more loop
Signed-off-by: Sally <sally.healey@cheshiresharedservices.gov.uk>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The original code assumed every codepath should be trated as a
successful check-in. Such is not the case and the regression tests
verify that the code acknowledges this.
To test:
1. Apply the regression tests patch
2. Run:
$ kshell
k$ prove t/db_dependent/Illrequests.t
=> FAIL: Tests fail
3. Apply this patch
4. Repeat 2
=> SUCCESS: Tests pass!
5. Sign off :-D
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This is only a perltidy of _check_max_qty to remove some space
inconsistencies, like:
if( $max_checkouts_allowed eq '' ){ return;}
if ( $checkout_count - $onsite_checkout_count >= $max_checkouts_allowed ) {
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
We only need to prefetch items if CircControl is set to ItemHomeLibrary
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Same as before but for patron_maxissueqty
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Making use of Koha::Checkouts make the code much more readable here.
It fixes 2 flaws:
* $type was not quote escaped
* the effective itemtype was not used which could lead to wrong
calculation (for instance item-level_itypes is set but the item does
not have the itype defined)
However there is something to note, we are going to make things a bit
less effective as we are now fetching the items to get their effective
itemtype (vs a SUM done at DB level)
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The different calls to _check_max_qty can be improved to highlight what
is really changing between each of them.
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch replaces all calls to RefundLostItemFeeRules with
Koha::CirculationRules->get_lostreturn_policy and removes the module it
makes redundant.
Test plan
1/ Confirm that there are no longer any uses of RefundLostItemFeeRules
in the codebase
2/ Confirm circulation tests still all pass
3/ Confirm you can still set and unset the lost return rules
4/ Signoff
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch makes the hooks be called only if the checkin is effective
(i.e. if it is not rejected for some reason.
To test:
1. Apply the regression tests patch
2. Run:
$ kshell
k$ prove t/db_dependent/Koha/Plugins/Circulation_hooks.t
=> FAIL: Tests fail
3. Apply this patch
4. Repeat 2
=> SUCCESS: Tests pass!
5. Sign off :-D
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
AddReturn can be called on an item even if it's not checked out (to
trigger holds for instance).
The hook should (?) not be called in that situation
Test plan:
Confirm the above and that the following tests are now passing:
t/db_dependent/SIP/Message.t
t/db_dependent/Reserves.t
t/db_dependent/Circulation/issue.t
t/db_dependent/SIP/Transaction.t
t/db_dependent/Circulation.t
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch gets rid of a helper method used for calling the plugin
hooks.
To test:
1. Run:
$ kshell
k$ prove t/db_dependent/Koha/Plugins/Circulation_hooks.t
=> SUCCESS: Tests pass!
2. Apply this patch
3. Repeat 1
=> SUCCESS: Tests still pass!
4. Sign off :-D
Sponsored-by: ByWater Solutions
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch simplifies the payload as suggested on bug 25855. It also
keeps some specific params that cannot be deduced from the passed
checkout object, (e.g. if it is an onsite checkout).
Tests are cleared and added for this special exceptions.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch adds a call to _after_circ_actions into AddIssue and passes
an appropriate payload for plugins to utilise after issuing items.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch makes the hook be passed the Koha::Checkout object instead
of a hand-crafted list of attributes.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch generalizes the hook so it can be used by other circulation
actions.
Tests are also simplified by mocking some of the (extensive) plugin
hooks.
To test:
1. Repeat the test plan on the original patch
=> SUCCESS: All good
2. Sign off :-D
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch adds a new hook to notify plugins about renewal actions. To
test it:
1. Apply the unit tests
2. Run:
$ kshell
k$ prove t/db_dependent/Koha/Plugins/Circulation_hooks.t
=> FAIL: The tests expect some warnings to show, and they don't (i.e.
the sample plugin hook is not being called).
3. Apply this patch
4. Repeat 2
=> SUCCESS: Tests pass! The hook is being called on renewal!
5. Sign off :-D
Sponsored-by: ByWater Solutions
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
I can not see how this code is useful here. It checks for a reserve with priority 0 and found = NULL
That is not a status that should occur when filling a transfer. Either the found is 'T' if we are transferring due
to the hold, or the hold was placed after the transfer was initiated, and so the priority is not 0
Additional, AddReturn checks for reserves later and asks the staff to confirm waiting status.
ModReserveStatus also calls CartToShelf regardless of what happens here.
To test:
1 - Set UpdateItemLocationOnCheckin to:
_ALL_: CART
2 - SetAutomaticItemReturn = Do
3 - Check an item in at a different branch than it's homebranch to create a transfer
4 - Check the item in at it's homebranch
5 - View the item details page
6 - Item is not in CART location
7 - Apply patch
8 - Repeat
9 - Item is in CART location after completion of transfer
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Robb <jrobb@sekls.org>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This adds the ability to not refund lost item fees on return if the item
has been lost for more than a given number of days.
Test Plan:
1) Set the new system preference NoRefundOnLostReturnedItemsAge to a number of days
2) Find a lost item that has been lost longer than that NoRefundOnLostReturnedItemsAge days which would have otherwise been refunded
3) Return the item
4) Note no refund on the lost item fee was processed, the fee remains unchanged
5) prove t/db_dependent/Circulation.t
Signed-off-by: Deb Stephenson <DStephen@dubuque.lib.ia.us>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch moves the accountline->store call below the FinesLog code
such that we return the same 'thing' from _FixOverduesOnReturn as the
other clauses of the routine.
We also take the oportunity to clean up the warning thrown by an errant
call to the routine such that we output the actual itemnumber rather
than a HASH reference marker.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch removes any overdues which would be reversed on a backdated
return if CalcFineOnBackdate is enabled and the user has not already
attempted to pay off the accruing fine.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The item's location where not passed to UpdateStat
Signed-off-by: Signed-off-by: Sonia Bouis <sonia.bouis@univ-lyon3.fr>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
To test:
1 - Find or create a record with 10 items
2 - Set sysprefs:
decreaseLoanHighHolds - enable
decreaseLoanHighHoldsDuration - 2
decreaseLoanHighHoldsValue - 2
decreaseLoanHighHoldsControl - 'over the number of holdable items'/dynamic
3 - Set circ rules to allow 1 hold per record on the relevant record
4 - Place 3 holds on the record
5 - Check one item in and confirm hold to set to waiting
6 - Issue to the patron with the waiting hold
7 - Get a notice that loan period is decreased
8 - Don't confirm the checkout
9 - Apply patch
10 - Restart all the things
11 - Repeat checkout, no decrease this time!
Signed-off-by: Christopher Brannon <cbrannon@cdalibrary.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch changes the new circulation rule that's introduced from
useDaysMode to daysmode to improve consistency with other rule names.
We also update the accessors and code using them to reflect the new
term.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
There are 3 other occurrences where the new circ rule can be used:
* C4::Circulation::checkHighHolds
* Koha::Hold->set_waiting
* misc/cronjobs/thirdparty/TalkingTech_itiva_outbound.pl
Test plan:
* checkHighHolds
Enable decreaseLoanHighHolds and fill decreaseLoanHighHoldsDuration
Setup things to hit a "high demand" alert with a shortened due date
Check an item out
=> The due date must be recalculated depending on the circ rule useDaysMode.
* set_waiting
Set ExcludeHolidaysFromMaxPickUpDelay to "1" (note that there is currently
a bug in the description of the syspref, see bug 22381 comment 19)
Mark a hold waiting
The expiration date should have been set depending on the value of the
circ rule.
* TalkingTech cronjob
Cannot test this
Signed-off-by: Simon Perry <simon.perry@itcarlow.ie>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Moving the useDaysMode system preference to a circulation rule will add
much more flexibility in the calculation of the due date.
The initial request was to make hourly loan returned on closed when
(when checked out on the same close day).
To do so we do not want to take into account the calendar.
However the calendar need to be taken into account for other loan item types.
Other scenarios are possible, for instance depending on the branch.
This patchset will add a new "Days mode" column (next to "Loan period")
to the circulation rules page, with the different values of the
"useDaysMode" system preference + a "default" value, to default to the
system preference value.
Test plan:
- Define a long loan item type (like 10 days) that will use the calendar
(or default to the pref value, if the pref is not set to "ignore the
calendar")
- and a hourly loan (like 2 hours) that will ignore the calendar
- Create items with those item types
- Mark today as a closed day
- Check the items out
=> The hourly loan is due the same day
=> The other loan is due on an open day
QA note:
There is the need to force the "days_mode" option when Koha::Calendar is
initiated for the due date calculation. To make sure devs will not
forget it, the methods that need have it defined will throw an
exception.
Sponsored-by: Institute of Technology Carlow
Signed-off-by: Simon Perry <simon.perry@itcarlow.ie>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
As we are now removing them from MarkIssueReturned they should not be
removed from AddReturn as well.
Also I think this will fix a regression, if $doreturn is not set (in
case the item is withdrawn and BlockReturnOfWithdrawnItems or the item
is lost and BlockReturnOfLostItems, and other specific cases).
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
It's quite hard to know where this need to be fixed.
it can be either MarkIssueReturned or LostItem, depending on the
different cases we want to handle.
This patch picked MarkIssueReturned, but maybe the similar code in
AddReturn needs to be removed then.
== Test plan ==
1. Set MarkLostItemsAsReturned to 'from items tab of the catalog module'
2. Set AutoRemoveOverduesRestrictions to 'Do'
3. Set up an overdues restriction in the notice triggers
4. Check out an item and let the overdues process restrict the account
5. Navigate to the moredetail.pl page (items tab) for the overdue item
6. Mark the item lost
7. Return to the account in question - notice the item has been returned, but the restriction remains
8. Clean state: remove restriction + remove item lost status
9. Apply patch
10. Redo the test but this time in addition to the item being returned,
the restriction will be lifted.
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
To make sure we are going to display the correct hold's info we need to
pass the reserve_id.
== Test plan ==
1. Add some content to HOLD_SLIP notice, e.g.
<h2>[% branch.branchname %]</h2>
<div>[% biblio.author %]<br>[% biblio.title %]<br>[% item.barcode %]
<ul><li> Reserve ID: [% hold.reserve_id %]</li>
<li>Expiration date: [% hold.expirationdate %]</li></ul>
2. Add 2 holds for 1 patron to a single record
3. Check the reserve IDs in the reserves table - on a clean sandbox, they will be 1 and 2
4. Check in one of the items from the record and print the slip
5. Note that the reserve ID on the slip is 2 and the expiration date is blank
6. Repeated check ins do not change this
7. Check in a second item from the record
8. Note that the reserve ID for this hold is also 2, but this time the expiration date is filled in
9. Check in the first item again - the reserve ID stays as 2, but this time the expiration date is filled in
10. Apply patch
11. cancel the holds to come back to a clean state
(and maybe ensure items aren't in transit)
12. redo the test and see the following differences
13. 1st checkin:
1. expiration date ok
2. the reserve ID is the one of the first hold
14. 2nd checkin:
1. expiration date ok
2. the reserve ID is the one of the second hold
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
If think this case does not apply to real-life, but the logic needs to
be fixed.
If an item is due now, and AddReturn is called now with a return date in
the future, the issue is overdue and the patron must be debarred.
However it is not as we compare with now and not the return date
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Nick Clemens
Agustin Moyano
Jonathan Druart
Lari Taskula
Tomas Cohen Arazi
Martin Renvoize
Kyle M Hall