We do not need to format the date, DBIC handles DateTime correctly.
It fixes t/db_dependent/Letters.t with new SQL modes
Test plan:
prove t/db_dependent/Letters.t
prove t/db_dependent/Koha/Acquisition/Order.t
Must return green
Signed-off-by: Roch D'Amour <roch.damour@inlibro.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This adds a new basket attribute (create_items) that can optionally be
set to override AcqCreateItem.
The following have been modified to reflect this (with the value of
create_items that causes them to behave differently in parentheses):
* Cancelling receipt of an order (receiving)
* Creating an order by hand or from MARC (ordering)
* Receiving an order (receiving)
* Showing orders with uncertain price (ordering)
* Showing orders (receiving)
* Showing acquisition details in the OPAC (ordering)
Test plan:
1) Create baskets with "Create items when:" set to ordering,
receiving, cataloging and unset.
2) Test each of the above for each of these baskets, verifying that
the basket-specific attribute overrides AcqCreateItem if set and
falls back to the syspref otherwise.
NOTE: A check of AcqCreateItem in opac-detail.tt was removed because it
was redundant; the code path in question cannot be triggered unless
create_items/AcqCreateItems is set to the correct value anyway.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Barbara Fondren <bfondren@roundrocktexas.gov>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
At the moment we have 2 different modules for acquisition orders:
Koha::Tmp::Order[s] and Koha::Acquisition::Order
The later has been added before the creation of Koha::Object.
Koha::Tmp::Order[s] has been created to make the TT syntax for notices
works with acquisition order data.
This patch removes the temporary packages Koha::Tmp::Order[s] and adapt
the code of Koha::Acquisition::Order[s] to be based on Koha::Object[s].
It also overloads Koha::Object->new to add the trick that was done in
Koha::Acquisition::Order->insert. This is needed because acqui/addorder.pl
is called from several places and CGI->Vars is used to retrieved order's
attributes (and so much more). To avoid regression, the easiest (but not
cleanest) way to do is to filter on aqorders column's names.
This is *not* a pattern to follow!
Test plan:
Create basket and add orders from different ways, then continue a whole
acquisition process
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This seems to cause fewer problems with the existing acquisitions code.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
This allows creation of special baskets that include standing orders.
These orders do not have a known quantity (and may not have a known
price in advance). Upon receipt, the received items are split into a new
completed order.
Test plan:
1) Run updatedatabase.pl.
2) Run prove t/db_dependent/Acquisition/StandingOrders.t . (and the
other Acquisition tests).
3) Create a new basket, mark it as a standing order basket.
4) Add an order to this basket, and notice that the quantity field is
missing (and thus not required).
5) Receive items for this order, and notice that the original order is
unchanged. The new child order line should have the correct price
and quantity information.
(Note: the QA tools output what seems to be a spurious spelling error
for Test::More's "isnt" in StandingOrders.t.)
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
The tests highligh the problem: if the parent_ordernumber attribute is
not set on inserting an order, the object returned by the method does
not contain the value (undef).
Test plan:
Verify the tests are consistent and
prove t/db_dependent/Acquisition/CancelReceipt.t
should return green.
You can also verify that receive partially an order and cancel the
receipt work as expected.
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Since ordernumber is the pk, it is stupid to use search.
Signed-off-by: Paola Rossi <paola.rossi@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
All acquisition related tests and the QA script pass.
I can't find any regressions with these patches.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
The C4::Acquisition module should be exploded in order to add
readability and maintainability to this part of the code.
This patch is a POC, it introduces a new Koha::Acquisition::Order module and put in
it the code from NewOrder and NewOrderItem.
Test plan:
1/ Create an order, modify it, receive it, cancel the receipt.
2/ Launch the prove command on all unit tests modified by this patch and
verify that all pass.
Signed-off-by: Paola Rossi <paola.rossi@cineca.it>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Jonathan Druart
Nick Clemens
Tomas Cohen Arazi
Jesse Weaver
Jonathan Druart