The patch "Bug 19116: Hold not set to waiting after transfer" added a
new meaning to 'Reserved' return value of C4::Reserves::CheckReserves
function. Let's remove double usage and have separate Transferred
return value so we can differentiate between attached and non-attached
holds. This will come useful in future refactorings.
This patch does no changes to the logic except in the
/cgi-bin/koha/circ/branchtransfers.pl and circulation.pl we now give
similarly to waiting state notice about hold being transferred.
To test:
1) Apply this patch
2) Create a new item level hold so that pickup library is different
than where the item is currently. Then return the item so that hold
is being attached and transferred.
3) Go to branchtransfers.pl and try to create a new transfer: it
should prompt you with message "Item is attached to a hold and
being transferred for XXX" and provide you with option to cancel
the hold or to ignore the transfer.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
With the first uses of Koha::Item->request_transfer and
Koha::Item::Transfer->cancel having been added, we need to update
GetTransferFromTo to respect transfers that have been requested but
not yet sent and not cancelled.
Test plan
1/ Run the included unit test
2/ Confirm the "Transfers to recieve" page loads
3/ Signoff
Signed-off-by: Kathleen Milne <kathleen.milne@cne-siar.gov.uk>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Update C4::Circulation::AddReturn to use Koha::Item->get_transfer to
find requested transfers and use Koha::Item::Transfer->receipt to complete
transfer requests if they have arrived at their destination or return the
relevant 'WrongTransfer', 'WasTransfered' and 'TransferTrigger' messages
to the end user.
Signed-off-by: Kathleen Milne <kathleen.milne@cne-siar.gov.uk>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch changes the original implementation so the item object is
refreshed altogether instead of explicitly pinpointing a specific field
we identified an edge case can leave out from ->store. I propose this
alterate implementation because what this bug highlights is the fact we
don't code thinking calls to things can have side-effects (like this
case, with AddReturn updating the onloan status (and maybe other
things?).
To test:
1. Make sure circ tests pass with and without this patch
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
If any item is currently checked out to a patron, and the item is then checked out directly to another patron without manually checking the item in first, the items.onloan column will remain NULL.
This will only happen if the new checkout will be due the same day as the previous checked.
This is caused by the item being returned without updating the item object from storage afterward. Even though AddIssue will call AddReturn which sets the value of onloan to NULL in the database, we are not passing in the item object by reference, so it's onloan value remains set to a date. Then we set the onloan value to the same date. Because the value does not change in the object, the column does not get marked dirty.
We could update the object from storage first, but it seems more efficient to mark the column as dirty manually to avoid that otherwise unnecessary fetch.
Test Plan:
1) Apply these patches
2) prove t/db_dependent/Circulation.t
Signed-off-by: Lisette Scheer <lisettes@latahlibrary.org>
Signed-off-by: Marti Fuerst <mfuerst@hmcpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The deadlock reports tell us that multiple transactions are
waiting for a X lock on a record but using a secondary index
on borrowernumber and itemnumber. Since we have the issue_id
at hand already, we should use that and benefit from the clustered
index (on PK) instead of using a secondary index.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
While this won't prevent the deadlock, it should catch the case where
a deadlock causes the DB update to fail and provide feedback to the user
and rollback the transaction
I don't know how to trigger the deadlock, I can only confirm that we see it, and
that this should catch it.
To test:
1 - Apply patches
2 - Checkout several items to a patron
3 - Confirm that 'Renew all' feature continues to work as expected and all items are renewed
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
To prevent conflict with Encode::encode
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
There is a difference between YAML::Load and YAML::XS::Load
From YAML::XS pod:
"YAML::XS only deals with streams of utf8 octets"
Test plan:
We are going to test 1 occurence and QA will confirm others don't
contain typos.
0. Don't apply the patches
1. Create a new itemtype with code=❤️
2. Create a new item using this itemtype (to biblionumber=1 will work)
3. Fill OpacHiddenItems with
itype: [❤️]
4. Search for "street shuffle" or any terms that will return the biblio
Notice that the item is there (there is an error in logs)
5. Apply the patches
6. Repeat 4 and confirm that the item is now hidden
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
From tht YAML pod:
"""
This module has been released to CPAN as YAML::Old, and soon YAML.pm will be changed to just be a frontend interface module for all the various Perl YAML implementation modules, including YAML::Old.
If you want robust and fast YAML processing using the normal Dump/Load API, please consider switching to YAML::XS. It is by far the best Perl module for YAML at this time. It requires that you have a C compiler, since it is written in C.
"""
See also
https://gitlab.com/koha-community/qa-test-tools/-/merge_requests/35
Test plan:
Try some place where YAML::XS is not used and confirm that it works
correctly
QA note: This patch removes some uses of YAML that were not useful
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Since bug 26639 we have auto savepoint enabled and the LOCK TABLE query
in C4::Circulation::SendCirculationAlert is not correctly handled.
From the MySQL doc that is copied few lines before, "LOCK TABLE will
commit any transactions", but here we don't have a savepoint and the
release for a non-existent savepoint will throw a DBI exception.
This patch removes the unecessary transaction and prevent the following
error when a renewal is done:
> DBIx::Class::Storage::DBI::mysql::_exec_svp_release(): DBI Exception: DBD::mysql::db do failed: SAVEPOINT savepoint_0 does not exist [for Statement "RELEASE SAVEPOINT savepoint_0"] at /usr/share/koha/lib/C4/Circulation.pm line 3590
Test plan:
1. Enable RenewalSendNotice
2. Add some email address to patron and select the email box from the message preference "Item checkout and renewal" in order to receive renewal emails.
3. Check 1 item out to a patron
4. Renew it
Signed-off-by: Andrew Nugged <nugged@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
In the previous patch you may have noticed many warns when running the tests
We add guarantor charges to a variable to determine if over the limit, but we don't initialize that value
We should
To test:
1 - Apply first patch and follow test plan
2 - Note warns when proving test
3 - Apply this patch
4 - prove
5 - No more warns
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
On bug 15494, the same method "get_yaml_pref_hash" has been added to two modules,
Koha/Config/SysPref.pm and Koha/Util/SystemPreferences.pm
We only need the one from Koha::Config::SysPref and remove the whole
Koha::Util::SystemPreferences module.
Test plan:
prove t/db_dependent/Circulation/issue.t
must return green
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
1. Check using git grep command that addDate does not exist
2. Check the patch that addDuration is spelt right
3. Check that tests pass t/Calendar.t
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Currently checkins can fail for one of two known reasons:
1 - Duplicate issue ids
2 - Anonymous borrower configuration issues
In the first case we refer to the 'data problems' or 'data corrupted' section of the about page. All errors are on the 'System information' tab and this is what we should mention
In the second case we refer to the data problems section, but information is in another section on the tab. Additionally, during checkin we issue an 'Error' but on the about page we call it a 'Warning' we should upgrade to error and specify what is broken
Additionally this patch fixes the warning that should display while issuing to a patron if anonymous is not set and patron has selected privacy
To test:
1 - Enable system preference OPACPrivacy
2 - Set system preference AnonymousPatron to '0'
3 - Log in a a patron on OPAC and set your privacy to never
4 - Issue a book to that patron in the staff client
5 - Note there is no warning
6 - Return the book
7 - Note the circulation page displays an error and the checkin fails and refers to 'data problems'
8 - Apply patch
9 - Issue another book to patron
10 - Note warning on the circulation page
11 - Try to check in a book again
12 - Check the new message makes sense
13 - Click the link to 'about.pl' check that errors are displayed
14 - Check the logs
15 - Confirm updated error message makes sense
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch remove the private sub used in GetIssuingCharges in favor
of get_effective_rule
It corrects the wrong precedence for rules and adds tests to cover this
subroutine
NOTE: the 'branch' for the discount will be determined by the signed in branch,
this is a bug to be fixed in the future
To test:
1 - Define a rentalcharge for an itemtype
2 - Define a 10% discount for library A, category A, all itemtypes
3 - Define a 50% discount for all libraries, category A, same itemtype
4 - Attempt to checkout an item from library A of the matching itemtype
5 - The 50% discount is applied
6 - Apply patches
7 - Attempt to checkout an item from library A of the matching itemtype
8 - The 10% discount is applied
prove -v t/db_dependent/Circulation.t
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Actually, the GetRecords service gives many information :
bibliographic data (marcxml field)
item data (items field)
issue data (issues field)
The issue data should not be sent by these service, its a privacy problem.
Biblio title and author are redundant.
This patch changes to use Koha::Checkouts to get issues informations with only the addition of item barcode.
Test plan :
1) Enable ILS-DI webservice
2) Checkout an item
3) Go to {opac}/cgi-bin/koha/ilsdi.pl?service=GetRecords&id={biblionumber}
4) Check the issues tag content
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The SQL code was duplicated, I combine them here
frombranch needs to take input
switch owning to frombranch in second script
initialize hash as empty list, not a reference
add a newline after printed output if not mailing notices
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch fixes a perlcritic issue and also replaces tabs with four
spaces where appropriate.
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The provided patch adds the following functionality:
* Add --owning to both advance_notice.pl and overdue_notice.pl
* Add --library to advance_notice.pl like the way overdue_notice.pl already works
When specifying "--owning" both scripts will use items.homebranch instead of
issues.branchcode to determine sending library.
For advance_notice.pl this affects non-digest DUE and PREDUE, but not digest notices.
To test:
1. Have a patron who wants advance notices as email with 2 days in advance (not digest)
2. Have the first overdue date set 3 days past due date
3. Have issue for that patron where date_due is 2 days away where the item homebranch differs from the issuing branch
4. Have issue for that patron where date_due is 3 days old
5. Run advance_notices.pl without --owning
6. Run overdue_notices.pl without --owning
7. Confirm that two messages were created for that patron with the sender being the issuing branch
8. Delete messages or create two more issues according to (3) and (4)
9. Run advance_notices.pl with --owning
10. Run overdue_notices.pl with --owning
11. Confirm that the two messages created has the item homebranch as sender
Extra feature for advance_notices.pl is that it adds "--library" the same way overdue_notices.pl has.
Adding variants of that flag in steps (5) and (9) above can confirm this option as well.
Sponsored-by: Gothenburg University Library
Signed-off-by: Björn Nylén <bjorn.nylen@ub.lu.se>
Signed-off-by: Timothy Alexis Vass <timothy_alexis.vass@ub.lu.se>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This squashed commit fixes:
- a small error in the checkouts related JS
- GetRenewCount now returns 6 values when a call to it succeeds, a
failed call should also return the same number of values. This commit
adds these additional values.
- Some changes in issue.t had broken the tests for unseen renewals (the
unseen tests were using variables that had been moved out of the tests'
scope).
- Also now using Koha::CirculationRules::set_rules to set circ rules
rather than using SQL queries.
- Fixed expected number of return values from GetRenewCount
- Moved unseen tests in issue.t to the bottom of the file to remove the
risk of interference with other test circ rules.
- There was a real mess in C4/Circulation.pm due to a bad rebase back in
February. Frankly it's a wonder anything worked at all. This commit
fixes that problem and reinstates the correct patch for
C4/Circulation.pm
- Somehow I'd never noticed this before but the columns in smart-rules.tt
were misaligned when UnseenRenewals was turned off. This was due to the
display of a <td> not being conditional when it should have been. This
is now fixed.
- This commit also fixes items 1 & 2 descibed by Katrin in comment #74 ->
comment #76.
- Fixed missing check for too_unseen in opac-user.tt, this test did used
to exist but got lost during sizeable rebase a few weeks ago :-(
- Added test for too_unseen to all AUTO_RENEWAL notice templates apart
from de-DE (as previously requested by Katrin)
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch implements changes requested by Katrin in QA feedback
(comment #38):
- Fix QA script failures
- Fix alter table column order mismatch
- Use new convention for JS strings
- Fix terminology
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch adds support for unseen renewals.
Here we retrofit knowledge of unseen renewals and add the display of unseen
renewal counts and warnings, in addition to adding the ability to
specify a renewal as being "unseen".
The functionality added here is goverened by the UnseenRenewals syspref.
Signed-off-by: Sally Healey <sally.Healey@cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
There were a couple changes that had no effect, so cleaned those up
Typo 'is' for 'if'
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This commit makes the changes suggested by Katrin in comment #50:
- Changed syspref from RecordIssuer to RecordStaffUserOnCheckout
- Changed terminology from "issue" to "check out" and variations
- Fixed name display to use patron-title.inc
- Made issuer column DEFAULT NULL consistently between issues and
old_issues and between the DB update and kohastructure.sql
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch adds the recording and display of the item issuer. This
behaviour is governed by the RecordIssuer syspref, if disabled (the
default), no recording or display of issuer will take place.
Signed-off-by: Ben Veasey <B.T.Veasey@lboro.ac.uk>
Signed-off-by: Bouzid Fergani <bouzid.fergani@inlibro.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
To test:
1) Apply patch, update database, restart services
2) Enable decreaseLoanHighHolds sysprefs if not already active
3) Go to circulation rules and set a value under 'Decrease loan holds
(day)' that is DIFFERENT from decreaseLoanHighHoldsDuration
4) Check out an item with holds and confirm that the value from the rule
is used instead of the system preference
5) Confirm tests pass before and after the patch
t/db_dependent/DecreaseLoanHighHolds.t
Sponsored-by: Catalyst IT
Signed-off-by: Lisette Scheer <lisetteslatah@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Henry Bolshaw <bolshawh@parliament.uk>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch adds unit tests for the newly introduced
_RestoreOverdueForLostAndFound method in C4::Circulation.
Test plan
1/ Read the new tests added to t/db_dependent/Circuation.t to ensure
they make sense
2/ Run the tests and verify they pass
3/ Signoff
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch adds handing for the new values available for the lostreturn
policy settings.
* undef - Do nothing, leave fees and fines as they were at the point of
lose.
* refund - Refund the lost item fee only
* charge - Refund the lost item fee and charge a fresh overdue fine
dated for a return on the date the item is 'found'
* restore - Refund the lost item fee and restore the original overdue
fine (dated for a 'return' on the date the item was 'lost'
Test plan
1/ apply patch
2/ updatedatabase, restart_all
3/ verify finesmode and CalculateFinesOnReturn and WhenLostChargeReplacementFee are on
4/ verify WhenLostForgiveFine is set to "Forgive"
5/ verify circ rules include fines
6/ set Default lost item fee refund on return policy to "Refund lost item charge"
7/ create 4 overdue checkouts that will incur fines
8/ run fines.pl
9/ confirm 4 items checked out with accruing fines
10/ confirm all 4 items have a replacement price
Item 1
11/ mark the first item lost
12/ verify that fine is gone and lost fee has been charged
13/ check item in
14/ verify that lost fee is gone and overdue charge has not returned
Item 2
15/ set Default lost item fee refund on return policy to "Refund lost item charge and charge new overdue fine"
16/ mark second item lost
17/ verify that fine is gone and lost fee has been charged
18/ check item in
19/ verify that lost fee is gone and a new overdue charge has been made
Item 3
20/ set Default lost item fee refund on return policy to "Refund lost item charge and restore overdue fine"
21/ mark third item lost
22/ verify that fine is gone and lost fee has been charged
23/ check item in
24/ verify that lost fee is gone and the old overdue charge has been restored
Item 4
25/ set Default lost item fee refund on return policy to "Leave lost item charge"
26/ mark fourth item lost
27/ verify that fine is gone and lost fee has been charged
28/ check item in
29/ verify that lost fee remains and the overdue charge is still gone
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The $checkouts variable was not defined in the PatronLibrary case at
all and in the else case the SQL join was totally missing.
To test:
1) Without this patch notice prove
t/db_dependent/Circulation/TooMany.t fails
2) With this patch notice prove
t/db_dependent/Circulation/TooMany.t succeeds
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The lines to calc due date are doubled
ModDateLastSeen is not needed as we set the item not lost and we can set
the date as we do for date last borrowed and save a DB store
Largely this is reading the code and confirming the changes make sense
To test:
1 - Apply patch
2 - Check out items, confirm it works as before
3 - prove -v t/db_dependent/Circulation.t
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chrisc@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Staff can create smart rules with empty (undefined) fine grace period.
In Overdues.pm undefined firstremind means 0, do the same in Circulation.pm.
To test:
1. Apply these patches
2. Run:
kshell
prove t/db_dependent/Circulation.t
Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack <chrisc@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch simply passes skip_record_index calls to Koha:Item:store
for all the changes done in AddReturn.
Testing is really verifiying that items are still correctly indexed at the end
For both search engines
To test:
1 - Find or create a record with multipel items
2 - Populate both:
UpdateItemLocationOnCheckin
UpdateNotForLoanStatusOnCheckin
3 - Confirm that checking in an item correctly updates the item status in search results
4 - Test with items issued, and items not issued
5 - Test when generating a transfer (checkin at different branch)
6 - Test when item was marked lost
7 - Test when filling transfer
Signed-off-by: Séverine Queune <severine.queune@bulac.fr>
Signed-off-by: Christopher Brannon <cbrannon@cdalibrary.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
It came to light that it's not clear to all users that a checkin results
in the completion of a transfer if one exists for the item being checked
in. This patch adds such a notification to the error messages loop to
highlight that the item has been recieved from it's sending brnach.
To test
1/ Setup a transfer from branch A to branch B
2/ Check the item in at branch B
3/ Note that a new message appears in the 'Check in message' alert box
saying "Item recieved from branch A"
4/ Signoff
Signed-off-by: Sally <sally.healey@cheshiresharedservices.gov.uk>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Some libraries would like to not only block the circulation of a guarantor based on fines owed by guarantees, but would also like to block circulation for all guarantees as well. Basically, if a family as a whole reaches a certain threshold of fines, the entire family will be blocked from checking out items.
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Set NoIssuesChargeGuarantorsWithGuarantees to $14
3) Create a family of four ( 2 guarantors, 2 guarantees ) where the parents guarantee both children
4) Give 3 of the 4 a $5 fine
5) None of them should be able to check out items
Signed-off-by: Barbara Johnson <barbara.johnson@bedfordtx.gov>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
t/db_dependent/Koha/Items.t .. 6/12 Use of uninitialized value in string eq at /kohadevbox/koha/C4/Circulation.pm line 1460.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
When an item that has triggered a hold is in transit to a library,
if the item is accidently shelved instead of scanned at the pickup library,
and then checked out to another patron, the holds shows the item still in transit
in the status, but says that it is waiting at the library, and the since date has vanished!
Test plan:
1) Place an item at Library A on hold for Patron 1 of Library B with pickup library at Library B
2) Check in the item at Library A to trigger the hold transfer
3) At Library B, check out the item to Patron 2 (click Yes)
=> The hold is not marked as in transit and is back to priority 1
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch capitalizes the 'ADDITIONAL_MATERIALS' key in the
needsconfirm hash return value for CanBookBeIssued to restore
consistency with previous code and ensure SIP Checkout works as
expected.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Use build_sample_item in tests
Simplify tests for the confirmation
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Whilst QAing bug 13547 it was highlighted to me the at the 952$3 field,
and thus the item.materials field, may contain arbitrary notes about the
material rather than just numeric values. As such we need to check for
the field being defined as aposed to greater than '0'.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This clarifies the preference name to make it clear we are talking about
the 'parts' that make up an 'item'. 'Part' is a well known term in
british english libraries and I think perhaps 'Materials' may be
confused with other terms?
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
With this follow-up patch, the intended confirmation of checkin based on
CircConfirmParts value is effective.
Sponsored-by: Royal College of Music [https://www.rcm.ac.uk/]
Sponsored-by: PTFS Europe [https://ptfs-europe.com/]
Signed-off-by: Frédéric Demians <f.demians@tamil.fr>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Test plan
1/ Catalogue an item to contain multiple parts by populating 'Materials
specified (bound volume or other part)'
2/ Enable the new system preference 'CircConfirmParts'
3/ Attempt to checkout the item created in step 1 to a user and note
that confirmation is now required.
4/ Checkout the item
5/ Attempt to checkin the item you have just checked out and note that
confirmation is required.
6/ Signoff
Sponsored-by: Royal College of Music [https://www.rcm.ac.uk/]
Sponsored-by: PTFS Europe [https://ptfs-europe.com/]
Signed-off-by: Frédéric Demians <f.demians@tamil.fr>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Bug 19014 altered CanBookBeRenewed to return (auto_)too_soon over on_reserve
For cron purposes this is the correct behaviour.
For display purposes we wish to see on_reserve over too_soon
This patchset adds a switch to 'CanBookBeRenewed' to alter the priority of these statuses
To test:
1 - set NoRenewalBeforePrecision to date only
2 - set a circ rule to auto-renewal=yes, no renewal before=0, checkout period to 7 days
3 - check item out
4 - confirm item shows Scheduled For Automatic Renewal in issues table
5 - place a hold on the item for another patron
6 - reload issues table for patron 1, confirm checkout still shows "scheduled for automatic renewal" rather than "on hold"
7 - change No Renewal Before value to 7
8 - reload issues table for patron 1, confirm checkout now shows "on hold"
9 - Apply patch
10 - restart_all
11 - Reload the issues table - confirm 'on_hold' still shows
12 - Change No Renewal Before to 0
13 - Refresh issues table, still shows 'On hold'
14 - perl misc/cronjobs/automatic_renewals.pl -v
15 - Result shows 'auto_too_soon'
16 - prove -v t/db_dependent/Circulation.t
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Bob Bennhoff <bbennhoff@clicweb.org>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
When batch editing, 2 reindex calls are sent to ES/Zebra.
We can easily avoid that reusing the skip_modzebra_update (renamed skip_record_index)
Additionally we should only send one request for biblio, and we should
only do it if we succeed
As the whole batch mod is in a transaction it is possible to fail in which case
Zebra queue is reset, but ES indexes have already been set
In addition to the skip param this patchset moves Zebra and Elasticsearch calls to
Indexer modules and introduces a generic Koha::SearchEngine::Indexer so that we don't
need to check the engine when calling for index
The new index_records routine takes an array so that we can reduce the calls to
the ES server.
The index_records routine for Zebra loops over ModZebra to avoid affecting current behaviour
Test plan:
General tests, under both search engines:
1 - Add a biblio and confirm it is searchable
2 - Edit the biblio and confirm changes are searchable
3 - Add an item, confirm it is searchable
4 - Delete an item, confirm it is not searchable
5 - Delete a biblio, confirm it is not searchable
6 - Add an authority and confirm it is searchable
7 - Delete an authority and confirm it is not searchable
Batch mod tests, under both search engines
1 - Have a bib with several items, none marked 'not for loan'
2 - Do a staff search that returns this biblio
3 - Items show as available
4 - Click on title to go to details page
5 - Edit->Item in a batch
6 - Set the not for loan status for all items
7 - Repeat your search
8 - Items show as not for loan
9 - Test batch deleting items
a - Test with a list of items, not deleting bibs
b - Test with a list of items, deleting bibs if no items remain where all items are only item on a biblio:
SELECT MAX(barcode) FROM items GROUP BY biblionumber HAVING COUNT(barcode) IN (1)
c - Test with a list of items, deleting bibs if no items remain where some items are the only item on a biblio:
SELECT MAX(barcode) FROM items GROUP BY biblionumber HAVING COUNT(barcode) IN (1,2)
10 - Confirm records are update/deleted as appropriate
Signed-off-by: Bob Bennhoff <bbennhoff@clicweb.org>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch
* sets one check for reserves and another for old_reserves in
atomic update
* Adds a message below the checkbox and adds detail when a hold is non
priority
* Fixes issue when there are more than one hold, but the first is non
priority
* Adds test case for this last scenario
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch implements necesary code to implement non priority feature
To test:
1) Apply all patches.
2) Run updatedatabase.
3) Checkout a specific item for patron1.
4) Place a hold on the same item for patron2 (do not check non priority
hold checkbox).
5) Try to renew the item for patron1.
CHECK => in checkouts table, there is a message that the item could not
be renewed because there was a hold.
6) Cleanup all checkouts and holds.
7) repeat steps 3 to 5, but this time check the non priority checkbox.
SUCCESS => item was renewed
8) prove t/db_dependent/Holds.t
Signed-off-by: Lisette Scheer <lisettes@latahlibrary.org>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
After discussion with Martin we decided that it could be the correct way
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
It was not used
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This code was duplicated and we are going to need it.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Remove duplicated logic for searching circulation rules.
This can be replaced with get_effective_rules().
To test:
1. prove t/db_dependent/Circulation/GetHardDueDate.t
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
To test:
1 - Go to Circulation->Transfer
2 - Note your signed in branch
3 - Find an item from your branch and create a transfer to branch B
4 - Confirm the item is marked as held at your current branch and is being transferred to B
5 - Find an item from a third branch, branch C
6 - Transfer that item to brnach B
7 - Confirm the item is held at your current branch and is being transferred to B
8 - prove -v t/db_dependent/Circulation.t
9 - prove -v t/db_dependent/Koha/Items.t
10 - prove -v t/db_dependent/RotatingCollections.t
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Bug 26078: (follow-up) used validTransfer instead of checking WrongTransfer message
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
To test:
- Have 2+ branches
- Set your default return policy to Item returns to issuing library
- Find an item with holding branch of Branch A
- Set your library to Branch B
- Check item in
- Koha generates a transfer to Branch A. In doing so, it sets the item holding branch to Branch B
- Set your library to Branch A
- Check item in
- Koha generate a transfer to Branch B. In doing so, it sets the item holding branch to Branch A
- Set you library to Branch A
- Check the item in
. . . Repeat indefinitely.
Apply patch
Repeat
No more loop
Signed-off-by: Sally <sally.healey@cheshiresharedservices.gov.uk>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The original code assumed every codepath should be trated as a
successful check-in. Such is not the case and the regression tests
verify that the code acknowledges this.
To test:
1. Apply the regression tests patch
2. Run:
$ kshell
k$ prove t/db_dependent/Illrequests.t
=> FAIL: Tests fail
3. Apply this patch
4. Repeat 2
=> SUCCESS: Tests pass!
5. Sign off :-D
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This is only a perltidy of _check_max_qty to remove some space
inconsistencies, like:
if( $max_checkouts_allowed eq '' ){ return;}
if ( $checkout_count - $onsite_checkout_count >= $max_checkouts_allowed ) {
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
We only need to prefetch items if CircControl is set to ItemHomeLibrary
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Same as before but for patron_maxissueqty
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Making use of Koha::Checkouts make the code much more readable here.
It fixes 2 flaws:
* $type was not quote escaped
* the effective itemtype was not used which could lead to wrong
calculation (for instance item-level_itypes is set but the item does
not have the itype defined)
However there is something to note, we are going to make things a bit
less effective as we are now fetching the items to get their effective
itemtype (vs a SUM done at DB level)
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The different calls to _check_max_qty can be improved to highlight what
is really changing between each of them.
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch replaces all calls to RefundLostItemFeeRules with
Koha::CirculationRules->get_lostreturn_policy and removes the module it
makes redundant.
Test plan
1/ Confirm that there are no longer any uses of RefundLostItemFeeRules
in the codebase
2/ Confirm circulation tests still all pass
3/ Confirm you can still set and unset the lost return rules
4/ Signoff
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch makes the hooks be called only if the checkin is effective
(i.e. if it is not rejected for some reason.
To test:
1. Apply the regression tests patch
2. Run:
$ kshell
k$ prove t/db_dependent/Koha/Plugins/Circulation_hooks.t
=> FAIL: Tests fail
3. Apply this patch
4. Repeat 2
=> SUCCESS: Tests pass!
5. Sign off :-D
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
AddReturn can be called on an item even if it's not checked out (to
trigger holds for instance).
The hook should (?) not be called in that situation
Test plan:
Confirm the above and that the following tests are now passing:
t/db_dependent/SIP/Message.t
t/db_dependent/Reserves.t
t/db_dependent/Circulation/issue.t
t/db_dependent/SIP/Transaction.t
t/db_dependent/Circulation.t
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch gets rid of a helper method used for calling the plugin
hooks.
To test:
1. Run:
$ kshell
k$ prove t/db_dependent/Koha/Plugins/Circulation_hooks.t
=> SUCCESS: Tests pass!
2. Apply this patch
3. Repeat 1
=> SUCCESS: Tests still pass!
4. Sign off :-D
Sponsored-by: ByWater Solutions
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch simplifies the payload as suggested on bug 25855. It also
keeps some specific params that cannot be deduced from the passed
checkout object, (e.g. if it is an onsite checkout).
Tests are cleared and added for this special exceptions.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch adds a call to _after_circ_actions into AddIssue and passes
an appropriate payload for plugins to utilise after issuing items.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch makes the hook be passed the Koha::Checkout object instead
of a hand-crafted list of attributes.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch generalizes the hook so it can be used by other circulation
actions.
Tests are also simplified by mocking some of the (extensive) plugin
hooks.
To test:
1. Repeat the test plan on the original patch
=> SUCCESS: All good
2. Sign off :-D
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch adds a new hook to notify plugins about renewal actions. To
test it:
1. Apply the unit tests
2. Run:
$ kshell
k$ prove t/db_dependent/Koha/Plugins/Circulation_hooks.t
=> FAIL: The tests expect some warnings to show, and they don't (i.e.
the sample plugin hook is not being called).
3. Apply this patch
4. Repeat 2
=> SUCCESS: Tests pass! The hook is being called on renewal!
5. Sign off :-D
Sponsored-by: ByWater Solutions
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
I can not see how this code is useful here. It checks for a reserve with priority 0 and found = NULL
That is not a status that should occur when filling a transfer. Either the found is 'T' if we are transferring due
to the hold, or the hold was placed after the transfer was initiated, and so the priority is not 0
Additional, AddReturn checks for reserves later and asks the staff to confirm waiting status.
ModReserveStatus also calls CartToShelf regardless of what happens here.
To test:
1 - Set UpdateItemLocationOnCheckin to:
_ALL_: CART
2 - SetAutomaticItemReturn = Do
3 - Check an item in at a different branch than it's homebranch to create a transfer
4 - Check the item in at it's homebranch
5 - View the item details page
6 - Item is not in CART location
7 - Apply patch
8 - Repeat
9 - Item is in CART location after completion of transfer
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Robb <jrobb@sekls.org>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This adds the ability to not refund lost item fees on return if the item
has been lost for more than a given number of days.
Test Plan:
1) Set the new system preference NoRefundOnLostReturnedItemsAge to a number of days
2) Find a lost item that has been lost longer than that NoRefundOnLostReturnedItemsAge days which would have otherwise been refunded
3) Return the item
4) Note no refund on the lost item fee was processed, the fee remains unchanged
5) prove t/db_dependent/Circulation.t
Signed-off-by: Deb Stephenson <DStephen@dubuque.lib.ia.us>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch moves the accountline->store call below the FinesLog code
such that we return the same 'thing' from _FixOverduesOnReturn as the
other clauses of the routine.
We also take the oportunity to clean up the warning thrown by an errant
call to the routine such that we output the actual itemnumber rather
than a HASH reference marker.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch removes any overdues which would be reversed on a backdated
return if CalcFineOnBackdate is enabled and the user has not already
attempted to pay off the accruing fine.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The item's location where not passed to UpdateStat
Signed-off-by: Signed-off-by: Sonia Bouis <sonia.bouis@univ-lyon3.fr>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
To test:
1 - Find or create a record with 10 items
2 - Set sysprefs:
decreaseLoanHighHolds - enable
decreaseLoanHighHoldsDuration - 2
decreaseLoanHighHoldsValue - 2
decreaseLoanHighHoldsControl - 'over the number of holdable items'/dynamic
3 - Set circ rules to allow 1 hold per record on the relevant record
4 - Place 3 holds on the record
5 - Check one item in and confirm hold to set to waiting
6 - Issue to the patron with the waiting hold
7 - Get a notice that loan period is decreased
8 - Don't confirm the checkout
9 - Apply patch
10 - Restart all the things
11 - Repeat checkout, no decrease this time!
Signed-off-by: Christopher Brannon <cbrannon@cdalibrary.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch changes the new circulation rule that's introduced from
useDaysMode to daysmode to improve consistency with other rule names.
We also update the accessors and code using them to reflect the new
term.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
There are 3 other occurrences where the new circ rule can be used:
* C4::Circulation::checkHighHolds
* Koha::Hold->set_waiting
* misc/cronjobs/thirdparty/TalkingTech_itiva_outbound.pl
Test plan:
* checkHighHolds
Enable decreaseLoanHighHolds and fill decreaseLoanHighHoldsDuration
Setup things to hit a "high demand" alert with a shortened due date
Check an item out
=> The due date must be recalculated depending on the circ rule useDaysMode.
* set_waiting
Set ExcludeHolidaysFromMaxPickUpDelay to "1" (note that there is currently
a bug in the description of the syspref, see bug 22381 comment 19)
Mark a hold waiting
The expiration date should have been set depending on the value of the
circ rule.
* TalkingTech cronjob
Cannot test this
Signed-off-by: Simon Perry <simon.perry@itcarlow.ie>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Moving the useDaysMode system preference to a circulation rule will add
much more flexibility in the calculation of the due date.
The initial request was to make hourly loan returned on closed when
(when checked out on the same close day).
To do so we do not want to take into account the calendar.
However the calendar need to be taken into account for other loan item types.
Other scenarios are possible, for instance depending on the branch.
This patchset will add a new "Days mode" column (next to "Loan period")
to the circulation rules page, with the different values of the
"useDaysMode" system preference + a "default" value, to default to the
system preference value.
Test plan:
- Define a long loan item type (like 10 days) that will use the calendar
(or default to the pref value, if the pref is not set to "ignore the
calendar")
- and a hourly loan (like 2 hours) that will ignore the calendar
- Create items with those item types
- Mark today as a closed day
- Check the items out
=> The hourly loan is due the same day
=> The other loan is due on an open day
QA note:
There is the need to force the "days_mode" option when Koha::Calendar is
initiated for the due date calculation. To make sure devs will not
forget it, the methods that need have it defined will throw an
exception.
Sponsored-by: Institute of Technology Carlow
Signed-off-by: Simon Perry <simon.perry@itcarlow.ie>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
As we are now removing them from MarkIssueReturned they should not be
removed from AddReturn as well.
Also I think this will fix a regression, if $doreturn is not set (in
case the item is withdrawn and BlockReturnOfWithdrawnItems or the item
is lost and BlockReturnOfLostItems, and other specific cases).
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
It's quite hard to know where this need to be fixed.
it can be either MarkIssueReturned or LostItem, depending on the
different cases we want to handle.
This patch picked MarkIssueReturned, but maybe the similar code in
AddReturn needs to be removed then.
== Test plan ==
1. Set MarkLostItemsAsReturned to 'from items tab of the catalog module'
2. Set AutoRemoveOverduesRestrictions to 'Do'
3. Set up an overdues restriction in the notice triggers
4. Check out an item and let the overdues process restrict the account
5. Navigate to the moredetail.pl page (items tab) for the overdue item
6. Mark the item lost
7. Return to the account in question - notice the item has been returned, but the restriction remains
8. Clean state: remove restriction + remove item lost status
9. Apply patch
10. Redo the test but this time in addition to the item being returned,
the restriction will be lifted.
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
To make sure we are going to display the correct hold's info we need to
pass the reserve_id.
== Test plan ==
1. Add some content to HOLD_SLIP notice, e.g.
<h2>[% branch.branchname %]</h2>
<div>[% biblio.author %]<br>[% biblio.title %]<br>[% item.barcode %]
<ul><li> Reserve ID: [% hold.reserve_id %]</li>
<li>Expiration date: [% hold.expirationdate %]</li></ul>
2. Add 2 holds for 1 patron to a single record
3. Check the reserve IDs in the reserves table - on a clean sandbox, they will be 1 and 2
4. Check in one of the items from the record and print the slip
5. Note that the reserve ID on the slip is 2 and the expiration date is blank
6. Repeated check ins do not change this
7. Check in a second item from the record
8. Note that the reserve ID for this hold is also 2, but this time the expiration date is filled in
9. Check in the first item again - the reserve ID stays as 2, but this time the expiration date is filled in
10. Apply patch
11. cancel the holds to come back to a clean state
(and maybe ensure items aren't in transit)
12. redo the test and see the following differences
13. 1st checkin:
1. expiration date ok
2. the reserve ID is the one of the first hold
14. 2nd checkin:
1. expiration date ok
2. the reserve ID is the one of the second hold
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
If think this case does not apply to real-life, but the logic needs to
be fixed.
If an item is due now, and AddReturn is called now with a return date in
the future, the issue is overdue and the patron must be debarred.
However it is not as we compare with now and not the return date
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Koha::Account->add_credit is expecting a positive amount.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Didier Gautheron <didier.gautheron@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Test plan:
1) Before the patch when one checks in something using the KOCT the last seen
date is not updated.
2) After the patch when one checks in something using the KOCT the last seen
date is updated.
Signed-off-by: Laurence Rault <laurence.rault@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
In Koha 18.11 backdating a return triggered a recalculation of the fine. This was removed in bug 14591, and I believe it was in error. The bug report itself has no justification for the change in behavior.
Test Plan:
1) Disable CalculateFinesOnReturn
2) Backdate an overdue with fines, note the fine does not change
3) Apply this patch
4) Repeat step 2
5) The fine should be updated!
Signed-off-by: Kelly McElligott <kelly@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
We should use Koha::DateUtils instead of Date::Time directly
This patch simplay replaces calls to now() with a call to dt_from_string()
which does effectively the same thing.
Probably reading the code and verifying changes is sufficient but...
To test:
1 - confirm the files all compile
2 - confirm all tests pass
3 - confirm Koha still works
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
In some tests we want to know if we are in a testing environment.
When run the usual way, our trick works, the perl interpreter matches 'prove':
$ENV{_} eq 'prove'
In other situations, we have the KOHA_NO_TABLE_LOCKS environment variables, for the SendCirculationAlert race conditions (see bug 15854 and bug 18364).
For unknown reasons, Jenkins runs the tests with /usr/bin/perl.
This patch suggests to rename KOHA_NO_TABLE_LOCKS and use KOHA_TESTING
instead, when prove is not used (or not correctly detected as it it the
case for Jenkins)
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
To test:
1 - Verify on staff side that patron can be edited to opt in our out of auto renewal
2 - Check out some items to a patron opted in to auto renewal
3 - Ensure the items are checked out and set to autorenew
4 - Login on the opac at the patron
5 - Verify items cannot be renewed as scheduled for auto-renewal
6 - On staff side, opt patron out of auto renewal
7 - Verify on opac items are no longer marked for auto renewal
8 - Run the auto renewal cron job, items are not renewed
9 - Set 'no renewal before' to a setting that would prevent renewal
10 - Verify that opting patron in or out of auto renewal changes only the reason items cannot be renewed
11 - Set 'no renewal before' to a setting that would allow for renewal
12 - Verify that opting patron in/out changes their ability to renew
13 - Verify that when opted out cron does not renew
14 - Verify that when opted in the item is auto renewed
15 - Reset the due date, opt out, verify manual renewal succeeds
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patchset moves all code to calculate the correct renewal branch into Koha::Item.pm
When interface is opac we follow the syspref, otherwise we use the current userenv, or pass through
a defined branch
To test:
1 - Check out an item to a patron
2 - Set allowed renewals in the circ rules to 100 (just so you can keep testing)
3 - Renew the item in staff interface, confirm it is recorded correctly in statistics table (as signed in branch)
4 - Renew via the opac, testing with each setting of OpacRenewalbranch
5 - prove -v t/db_dependent/Koha/Item.t
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
We do not need this subroutine, moving it where it is used.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Starting to replace the ModItem calls with Koha::Item->store
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch adds support for passing a trigger to
C4::Circulation::transferbook and passes 'RotatingCollection' to it when
called inside the rotating collections routine.
Test plan:
1/ Perform a rotating collection transfer operations
2/ Check the database for instances of 'RotatingCollection' in the
branchtransfers.reason field.
3/ Signoff
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch adds handling to catch transfers that may have been triggered
on item return.
Test Plan:
1) Enable AutomaticItemReturn and accompanying system preference
2) Return an item to the wrong branch and note the transfer
3) Check the database for the new trigger value
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
To test:
1 - Place a hold on an item
2 - Go to Circulation->Transfers
3 - Attempt to transfer item to a branch it is not expected at
4 - No warning
5 - Apply patches
6 - Repeate
7 - You get a notice that there is a hold and must deal with the hold (or ignore)
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Looks like the atomicupdate and sysprefs.sql changes were lost at some point.
Don't forget to run QA tools on your patches before submitting
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch updates a request's status to RET upon return
Sponsored-by: Loughborough University
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Some rebase issues, accounttype no longer exists, circ rules make
CanBookBeRenewed fail, so we mock that too
interface must be passed as a hashref
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
When the RenewAccruingItemWhenPaid syspref is enabled and all the fines
on an item that is accruing fines are paid, we automatically renew that
item to prevent it from starting to accrue fines again.
This patch adds an additional argument to C4::Circulation::AddRenewal
which allows us to skip the calculation of fines upon renewal, which we
don't want to do if the fines on that item have just been paid. Existing
calls to AddRenewal have not been amended because there seems to be a
convention of only passing undef when adding arguments that require
their positioning to be maintained. Since the new argument is the last
one, this is not the case with any existing call.
Sponsored-by: Loughborough University
Signed-off-by: Lucy Harrison <L.M.Harrison@lboro.ac.uk>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
To Test:
1) Place a hold on an item.
2) Check in the item to trigger the hold. Item is now listed as
waiting.
3) Set branch to a different library.
4) Check in the item to trigger the hold. Notice that nothing but a
local use is recorded.
5) Apply the patch.
6) Repeat steps 1-4. Notice that the hold is triggered around routed to
its original pickup location. A transfer is set and the hold status
is changed from waiting to correctly showing the item as in transit.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch updates the wording in the 'lost and found' process to more
closely reflect what the process is achieving by replacing 'RETURNED'
with 'FOUND'
Test plan:
1) Grep codebase for _FixAccountForLostAndReturned and note there are no
longer any instanced of it.
2) Run t/db_dependent/Circulation.t and note it passes
3) Test returning/renewing an item that has been marked as lost and note
the updated values in the accountlines now use LOST_FOUND as
credit_type_code and 'FOUND' as the status for the 'LOST' fee
(debit_type_code 'LOST')
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This necessitates moving the circ rules from using '*' to using
undef/NULL.
Signed-off-by: Minna Kivinen <minna.kivinen@hamk.fi>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
To test:
1 - Checkout an item with auto renewal set and eligible for auto renew
2 - Set no renewal before in the circ rules to 99 (something greater than the checkout period)
3 - perl misc/cronjobs/automatic_renewals.pl
4 - Check the statistics table, note the branch for renewal is null
SELECT * FROM statistics WHERE itemnumber={itemnumber} AND type='RENEWAL'
5 - Apply patch
6 - Repeat 1-4
7 - Note the branch is set to the issuing branch
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Ed Veal <eveal@mckinneytexas.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Test plan:
0 - Do not apply this patch
1 - Check out an item to a patron
2 - Make sure a fee will be charged when lost
3 - Mark the item lost
4 - Make sure the fee will not be refunded on return of the item
5 - Return the item
6 - Check it out to a new patron
7 - Write off the fine for the original patron
=> The item is now checked in
8 - Apply this patch and repeat 1 to 7
=> The item is still checked out
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
It appears that the transition to using Koha::Item in AddReturn has introduced a bug. Previously $item was a hashref with the key 'itemtype', now that it's an object, it has no itemtype method and so triggers an error with the message "The method Koha::Item->itemtype is not covered by tests!".
Test Plan:
1) Enable Branch Transfer Limits via itemtype
2) Check in an item
3) Note the error
4) Apply this patch
5) Restart all the things!
6) Check in an item
7) No error!
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Maribeth (Turner) Shafer <mshafer@ckls.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Use of uninitialized value $record_restrictions in uc at /kohadevbox/koha/C4/Circulation.pm line 3981
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
With bug 24217 pushed, lot of warnings appears during the tests are run.
Most of them are "Use of uninitialized value in "
Test plan:
Take a look at the output of run 1049
https://jenkins.koha-community.org/job/Koha_Master_D9/1049/consoleFull
Most of the warnings from this run will be removed by this patch
At least 2 are not fixed:
Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at /kohadevbox/koha/C4/Reserves.pm line 791.
t/db_dependent/Items_DelItemCheck.t => see 23463
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
We absolutely need that for modules.
We are enabling strict by using Modern::Perl.
Note that other modules from C4 use strict and warnings, instead of
Modern::Perl
Test plan: git grep 2505 **/*.pm should not return any results
And let's see later what needs to be fixed.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
If there is a limit for the number of suspension days
(maxsuspensiondays), the calculation is wrong. We are reducing the
number of days before taking into account the suspension charging
interval.
For instance, a checkin is 1 year late and the circ rules are defined to
charge 7 days every 15 days.
It results in 365 * 7 / 15 days of suspension => 170 days
Before this patch the calculation was:
365 * 7 limited to 333, 333 / 15 => 22 days
Test plan:
Given the examples in the commit messages and the description of the bug
report, setup complex circulation rules and confirm that the debarment
dates are calculated correctly
Signed-off-by: Hugo Agud <hagud@orex.es>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
No changes expected here. For the next patch we are going to need to add
test and calculate the new debarment date. To ease the writing of these
tests the calculation is moved out of the existing subroutine.
Signed-off-by: Hugo Agud <hagud@orex.es>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Wrong conflict resolution, the following
commit 6eade474ed
Bug 18276: Remove GetBiblioFromItemNumber - Easy ones
restored a previous change from
commit 546379cc92
Bug 17680: C4::Circulation - Remove GetItemIssue, simple calls
Not that "easy" or "simple"...
Test plan:
Run the test before and after this patch.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
When you use the date picker or book drop mode and check in an item that is due on that date, a fine is assessed and not refunded.
For example: item 12345 is due on 11/19/2109 23:59. On 11/20/2019 I check the item in using date picker/book drop setting the check in date to 11/19/2019 23:59, the patron is charged a fine, and the fine is not cleared as would be expected, since the item is being checked in before it is overdue.
Test Plan:
1) Back date a checkout so it is overdue
2) Run fines.pl to generate the fine
3) Return the item, backdating to the same date/time is was due
4) Note the fine was not removed
5) Apply this patch
6) Repeat steps 1-3
7) Fine should be zeroed out now!
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch makes the calculation of suspension expiration configuration
detached from the finesCalendar syspref. This way libraries have more
flexibility when setting circ rules.
I wrote this path as a bugfix, because the recent change pushed by bug 19204
changed this behavior and libraries have been complaining since they got
upgraded.
It is a minor change, just adding the new syspref, and replacing the
single place in which it is used for debarment calculation for the new
one.
The tests are updated similarly, just adding the new mocked syspref as
it was with the old one.
To test:
- Apply this patches
- updatedatabase
- Run:
$ kshell
k$ prove t/db_dependent/Circulation.t
=> SUCCESS: Tests pass!
- Sign off :-D
Sponsored-by: Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
Signed-off-by: Michal Denar <black23@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This adds the ability to alert a librarian of an item claimed as returned is actually returned.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Lisette Scheer <lisetteslatah@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
We require next_open_day & prev_open_day to be more flexible. We could
create a separate sub, but that's not very DRY given that they'll do
pretty much the same thing.
So next_open_day becomes next_open_days and prev_open_day becomes
prev_open_days and both functions accept an additional parameter which
determines how many days they add or subtract.
All calls of these two functions have been modified accordingly.
Sponsored-by: Cheshire West and Chester Council
Sponsored-by: Cheshire East Council
Sponsored-by: Newcastle City Council
Sponsored-by: Sefton Council
Signed-off-by: Liz Rea <wizzyrea@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch updates the variable name '$branch' to '$branchcode' in a
number of places to make it clearer what the variable contains.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
It looks like over progressive rebases of bug 20912 a clause was lost
within CanBookBeIssued such that a fatal error may be triggered if an
item with no corresponding itemtype was passed into the routine.
Additionally the we were passing a Koha::Library object to CalcDateDue
rather than a branchcode which resulted in a different duedate being
used in 'CanBookBeIssued' when compared to 'AddIssue'.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Joonas Kylmälä
Martin Renvoize
Tomas Cohen Arazi
Kyle M Hall
Marcel de Rooy
Nick Clemens
Jonathan Druart
Eden Bacani
Fridolin Somers
Stefan Berndtsson
Andrew Isherwood
Aleisha Amohia
Didier Gautheron
Frédéric Demians
Agustin Moyano
Lari Taskula
Christopher Brannon
Jesse Weaver