Add UNIQUE KEY entries to table definition
The UNIQUE KEY are required as a hold group 'might have' a target hold, not 'has many' target holds.
This update and the other things this patch updates in atomicupdate + kohastructure should fix the error thrown by command:
perl /kohadevbox/misc4dev/run_tests.pl --instance=kohadev --db-password=password --run-db-compare-only --compare-with=HEAD
This command no longer produces any errors.
Also in this patch:
Renamed table from 'hold_group_target_holds' to 'hold_groups_target_holds' and move it alphabetically to be after 'hold_groups' in kohastructure.sql
This is cleaner, as it matches the 'hold_groups' related table, and allows for alphabetical sorting on kohastructure.sql that makes sense i.e. hold_groups is created first, then hold_group_target_holds is created second with an FK to the former.
All of this passes:
prove ./t/db_dependent/Koha/Hold.t
prove ./t/db_dependent/Reserves/HoldGroup.t
prove ./t/db_dependent/Circulation*
prove ./t/db_dependent/Hold*
prove ./t/db_dependent/Reserves*
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
The skipping of non target holds was skipping all holds that are part of a hold group which has a target, including the target hold itself. This was wrong. Target holds need to be included as they are considered to be a regular 'found' hold.
Tests that prove the bug and its fix added to:
prove ./t/db_dependent/Koha/Hold.t
Signed-off-by: Anneli Österman <anneli.osterman@koha-suomi.fi>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
When a hold that belongs to a hold group becomes 'In transit' or 'Waiting',
it now becomes that hold group's target hold.
Subsequent check-ins that would satisfy other holds in the same hold
group are skipped, as they are part of a group that already has a
target.
The behavior change introduced here that differs from the groundwork
from bug 15516 are:
1) Before, only 'Waiting' holds would consider an action based on hold
groups i.e. cancel the other holds in the group. Now 'In transit'
also does this.
2) This hold groups related action used to be to cancel other holds in
the group. This is no longer the case. Now, the respective hold is
set as the hold group's target. This causes the holds in the same group that
are not the target to be skipped when a check-in that would otherwise
satisfy one of those holds happens. This behavior change allows the following
scenario which wasn't possible before:
A hold is marked 'Waiting'. It becomes its group target. For any reason,
that hold is then cancelled. Any subsequent check-in of an item of a
hold in this group may now becomes that group's new target.
Similarly, the same use case above is also true for 'In transit' holds.
----
The 'skip non-target holds' behavior has been added to check-in logic
(Reserves::_Findgroupreserve), 'holds to pull' logic
(pendingreserves.pl) and holds queue (HoldsQueue.pm).
Signed-off-by: Anneli Österman <anneli.osterman@koha-suomi.fi>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
Hold group target hold:
The hold that is set as the hold group's target. If a hold group has a
hold target, subsequent check-ins that would 'trap' items to the
remaining holds in the group are instead skipped.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
list and add actions:
/patrons/{patron_id}/hold_groups
New test file:
prove t/db_dependent/api/v1/patrons_hold_groups.t
Signed-off-by: Anneli <anneli.osterman@koha-suomi.fi>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Denar <black23@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Michal Denar <black23@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Pedro Amorim <pedro.amorim@openfifth.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuerste Henry <andrew@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>