To test:
1 - Set 'OpacRenewalBranch' to various settings
2 - Renew an item for a ptron under each setting
3 - Confirm action_log entries reflect the correct branch for each
secnario
4 - prove t/db_dependent/Circulation/issue.t
Signed-off-by: David Kuhn <techservspec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Mason James <mtj@kohaaloha.com>
Koha suffers of big bugs due to its history: When data are deleted, they are moved to another tables.
For instance issues and old_issues: when a checkin is done, it is moved to the old_issues table.
That leads to a main problem that is described on https://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/DBMS_auto_increment_fix
However we tried first to fix the problem (for issues/old_issues) at code level on bug 18242.
The goal was to prevent data lost.
Data lost may happens in this case:
Check an item out (issue_id = 1)
Check an item in (issue_id = 1)
Restart MySQL (reset auto increment for issue_id to 1)
Check an item out (issue_id = 1)
Check an item in => BOOM, the issue_id is a PK in old_issues and the move fails.
Before bug 18242 the data were lost, we inserted the value into old_issues, which fails silently (because of RaiseError set to 0 in Koha::Database), then delete the row from issues.
That has been fixed using a transaction.
This patch introduced a regression we tried to fix on bug 18651 comment 0, the patron was charged even if the checkin was rejected.
A good way to fix that would have been to LOCK the tables:
1- Start a transaction
2- LOCK the table to make sure nobody will read id and avoid race conditions
3- Move the content from one table to the other, dealing with ids
4- UNLOCK the table
5- Commit the transaction
But there were problems using LOCK and DBIx::Class (See commit 905572910b - Do no LOCK/UNLOCK the table).
Finally the solution implemented is not acceptable for several reasons:
- batch checkins may fail
- issue_id will always stay out of sync (between issues and old_issues)
See 18651 comment 66.
Since the next stable releases are very soon, and we absolutely need to fix this problem, I am suggesting to:
1- Execute the move in a transaction to avoid data lost and reject the checkin if we face IDs dup
=> It will only reject 1 checkin (max is 1 * MySQL restart), no need to deal with race conditions,
2- Display a warning on the checkin page and link to a solution/explanation
3- Communicate as much as we can on the proper fix: Update auto increment values when the DBMS is restarted - https://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/DBMS_auto_increment_fix
4- Display a warning on the about page for corrupted data (see bug 18931)
5- Write and make available a maintenance script to fix corrupted data (TODO LATER)
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Mason James <mtj@kohaaloha.com>
The table old_issues has a primary key defined on the issue_id column.
This issue_id comes from the issues table when an item is checked in.
In some case the value of issue_id already exists in the table
Basically this happens when an item is returned and mysqld is restarted:
The auto increment value for issues.issue_id will be reset to
MAX(issue_id)+1 (which is the value of the last entry of old_issues).
See also the description of bug 18003 for more informations.
In this solution the change is done at code level instead of DB
structure: If old_issues.issue_id already exists before moving from
the issues table, the issue_id is updated (not on cascade for
accountlines.issue_id, should it?) before the move.
Signed-off-by: Mason James <mtj@kohaaloha.com>
The test in SendCirculationAlert is extended by adding an env var
called KOHA_NO_TABLE_LOCKS. If this var is set to a true value,
the table locking is skipped too.
This is useful when running a test without prove. The variable could be
set in a shell profile.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Mason James <mtj@kohaaloha.com>
From the MySQL doc:
"LOCK TABLES is not transaction-safe and implicitly commits any active transaction before attempting to lock the tables."
If the LOCK/UNLOCK statements are executed from tests, the current transaction will be committed.
To avoid that we need to guess if this code is execute from testsa or not (yes it is a bit hacky)
Better ideas are welcome!
Another fix would have been to revert
commit be156d9ad9
Bug 15854: Use a READ and WRITE LOCK on message_queue
but theorically a race is still possible.
Existing tests seem to be safe, to test this patch you will need new
tests from bug 17964.
Test plan:
prove t/db_dependent/Letters/TemplateToolkit.t
twice, and notice that changes have been comitted.
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Mason James <mtj@kohaaloha.com>
The AddRenewal subroutine currently uses the circulation rules for the branch
stored in the Issues table (which is the holding branch) when calculating the new due date.
This patch replaces using the branch from the Issues table with the branch
specified by the HomeOrHoldingBranch syspref.
To test:
1. Set up 2 branches, Branch1 and Branch2
2. Set up a loan rule in Branch1 for DVDs with a 21 day loan period and a
21 day renewal period.
3. Set up a loan rule in Branch2 for DVDs with a 14 day loan period and a
14 day renewal period.
4. Checkout a DVD belonging to Branch1 while logged into Branch2. It will
receive the correct 21 day loan period.
5. Renewing the same DVD while logged into either Branch1 or Branch2
will give a 14 day due date, rather than 21 days.
6. Checkout a DVD belonging to Branch2 while logged into Branch1. It will
receive the correct 14 day loan period.
7. Renewing the same DVD while logged into either Branch1 or Branch2
will give a 21 day due date, rather than 14 days.
8. Apply the patch and repeat steps 4-7. The correct due date should be given
when the item is renewed, regardless of where it is checked out or renewed.
This update removes reassignment of $branch variable.
Signed-off-by: Cédric Vita <cedric.vita@dracenie.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
(cherry picked from commit 7d35bdf58a)
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
To make sure we will not never get a race conditions for these kinds of
notices, we need to add a LOCK on the message_queue table.
This does not smell the best way to do that, but I faced deadlock issues
when I tried to use "UPDATE FOR"
https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.7/en/innodb-locking-reads.htmlhttps://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.7/en/lock-tables.htmlhttps://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.7/en/commit.html
To test this patch, or another solution, you need to apply manually this
change:
my $message = C4::Message->find_last_message($borrower, $type, $mtt);
unless ( $message ) {
+ sleep(1);
C4::Message->enqueue($letter, $borrower, $mtt);
} else {
And repeat the test plan from first patch.
Do not forget to truncate the message_queue table.
Followed test plans, works as expected.
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Brendan A Gallagher <brendan@bywatersolutions.com>
(cherry picked from commit be156d9ad9)
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
There is an obvious race condition when CHECKIN and RENEWAL are
generated from circulation.pl calling svc/renew or svc/checkin in AJAX.
The 2 first queries will try to get the id of the last message
(find_last_message) and if it does not exist, they will insert it.
Theorically that could be lead to have several "digest" messages for a
given patron.
I did not recreate more than 2 messages, from the third one at least one
of the two firsts existed in the DB already.
This patch just simplifies the code to make the SELECT and INSERT or
UPDATE closer and limit the race condition possibilities.
Test plan:
0. Set RenewalSendNotice and circ rules to have a lot of renewals available
1. Use batch checkouts (or one by one) to check out several items to a
patron
2. Empty message_queue (at least of this patron)
3. Renew them all at once ("select all" link, "renew or check in"
button)
4. Check the message_queue
Without this patch you have lot of chances to faced a race condition and
get at least 2 messages for the same patron. This is not expected, we
expect 1 digest with all the messages.
With this patch apply you have lot of chances not to face it, but it's
not 100% safe as we do not use a mechanism to lock the table at the DBMS
level.
Tested both patches together, works as expected.
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Brendan A Gallagher <brendan@bywatersolutions.com>
(cherry picked from commit 607b14516a)
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Charges should not include elements less than a penny/cent
they are not displayed but can be saved to the database
causing "odd" behaviour down the line
Make the routine round the resultant charge to nearest cent,
so consistent values are returned.
Removed the one case where it was rounded post call.
Although the main danger is values generated by the discount
calculation apply the rounding to all returned charges in case
the item charge is defined using the 3rd or 4th decimal
places.
NOTE: prove -v t/db_dependent/Circulation.t triggers the change.
Though, all the returned amounts are 0.00 only.
Signed-off-by: Mark Tompsett <mtompset@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
(cherry picked from commit d84ed89557)
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
We should require a circulation rule to allow checkouts and reject them
if no rules are defined.
Test plan:
- Delete all issuing rules
- Check an item out
=> Without this patch the checkout is allowed
=> With this patch applied it is rejected
Signed-off-by: Mark Tompsett <mtompset@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
(cherry picked from commit 11dfb2e0b2)
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
For no discernable reason, when AddIssue calls AddRenewal, it passes the
branchcode generated from _GetCircControlBranch. Assume
_GetCircControlBranch is set to return items.homebranch. So:
1) If an item owned by LibraryA is checked out at LibraryB, the
statistic line branchcode will be LibraryB
2) If an item is renewed via the ajax datatables renewal function, the
statistic line branchcode will be LibraryB the
3) If an item is renewed via scanning the item into the checkout again,
statistic line branchcode will be *LibraryA*
This is clearly improper behavior. The renewal is taking place at
LibraryB, so the branchcode passed to AddRenewal should be LibraryB,
the logged in library. This also jives with the documentation for
the subroutine.
Test Plan:
1) Set CircControl to "the library the item is from" aka ( ItemHomeLibrary )
2) Set HomeOrHoldingBranch to 'The library the items is from" ( aka homebranch )
3) Create item with homebranch of LibraryA and holdingbranch of LibraryB
4) Set the logged in library to LibraryB
4) Check the item out to a patron at LibraryB
5) Note the statistics line has a branchcode of LibraryB
6) Check the item out again to trigger a renewal, renew the item
7) Note the statistic line has a branchcode of LibraryA!
8) Apply this patch
9) Repeat step 6
10) Note the statistics line has a branchcode of LibraryB!
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: David Kuhn <kuhn@monterey.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Mason James <mtj@kohaaloha.com>
If the AllowRenewalIfOtherItemsAvailable sys pref is set to allow, and a
borrower has an item checked out that has many items {30+} AND many
holds {70+) on it, loading the checkouts table for this borrower takes
FOREVER to load. The load time takes forever, because of the
factoring that happens to determine if an item is truly
available for renewal.
This patch swaps the use of GetMemberDetails for GetMember
and reorders the subroutine calls to check each items' renewability
from fastest to slowest.
In a test case, the results of pre patch were:
Start of loop: 2016-08-24T11:05:14
End of loop: 2016-08-24T11:05:29
Resulting in 15 seconds being spent in the loop
Post patch results were:
Start of loop: 2016-08-24T11:08:43
End of loop: 2016-08-24T11:08:48
Resulting in only 5 seconds being spent in the loop!
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Note there are no changes in functionality for the renewals column of
the patron checkouts table.
If you wish to go further and test the performance benefit:
1) Create a record with 50 items and 100 holds ( 50 waiting, 50 unfilled )
2) Check out one of the waiting holds to a patron
3) Time the amount of time it takes for the checkouts table to load
4) Apply this patch
5) Repeat step 3, you should see an improvement in load time
Signed-off-by: Jesse Maseto <jesse@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Mason James <mtj@kohaaloha.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Mason James <mtj@kohaaloha.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Mason James <mtj@kohaaloha.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Mason James <mtj@kohaaloha.com>
This patch makes C4::Circulation::AddReturn correctly store the itemtype
on the 'statistics' table.
To reproduce:
- Checkout master.
- Make a checkout.
- Check the 'statistics' table and notice the itemtype is correctly set
> SELECT * FROM statistics;
- Check the item in.
- Check the 'statistics' table and notice the itemtype is not set
> SELECT * FROM statistics WHERE type="return";
=> FAIL: itemtype is set to NULL
To test:
- Apply the regression tests patch
- Run the tests:
$ prove t/db_dependent/Circulation/Returns.t
=> FAIL: Tests fail
- Apply this patch
- Run the regression tests:
$ prove t/db_dependent/Circulation/Returns.t
=> SUCCESS: Tests now pass.
- Repeat the 'To reproduce' steps
=> SUCCESS: itemtype is now correctly set (in real life)
- Happily sign off :-D
Sponsored-by: Universidad Empresarial Siglo 21
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Mason James <mtj@kohaaloha.com>
Renewing an overdue would not work.
Log shows:
renew: Can't use string ("2144746608") as a HASH ref while "strict refs" in use at C4/Overdues.pm line 508., referer: /cgi-bin/koha/circ/circulation.pl?borrowernumber=1
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
(cherry picked from commit 4fa4b8a306)
Signed-off-by: Frédéric Demians <f.demians@tamil.fr>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
(cherry picked from commit 59d2cd9757)
Signed-off-by: Frédéric Demians <f.demians@tamil.fr>
Test Plan:
1) Find an overdue checkout with a fine
2) Renew item, note fine is not closed out (Account type F)
3) Apply this patch
4) Find another overdue checkout with a fine
5) Renew item, note fine is now correctly closed out
6) Backdate a checkout to be already overdue ( but not have a fine since
fines.pl hasn't run yet )
7) Renew item, note a closed out fine is created
Signed-off-by: Sean Minkel <sminkel@rcplib.org>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
(cherry picked from commit fe71eb0811)
Signed-off-by: Frédéric Demians <f.demians@tamil.fr>
To make sure the return can be done, AddIssue must not trust callers (they
should have done their job, but we are not sure) and check that the issue can
be returned before issuing to the patron.
There is no test plan here, this should not be possible from the Koha
interface.
However, looking at the code, it may be possible using SIP.
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
(cherry picked from commit 1a9674fd3a)
Signed-off-by: Frédéric Demians <f.demians@tamil.fr>
If an issue is already checked out, CanBookBeIssued must check if the
issue can be checked in before processing the return.
In such cases (depending of the AllowReturnToBranch pref), the issue
should not be allowed.
Prior to this patch, the checkin was not done and the checkout failed
with "Duplicate entry '1204321' for key 'itemnumber'". Indeed since bug
14978, there is an uniq key on issues.itemnumber. Before bug 14978 the
issue existed but was hidden (and some weird behaviors certainly
happened!).
To avoid Koha to crash, a check is added to CanBookBeIssued (call to
CanBookBeReturned) and the librarian is not able to process the
checkout.
Test plan:
- Set AllowReturnToBranch to anywhere
- Check an item (homebranch Library 1, holding branch Library 1) out from Library 1
- Check the item out from Library 2
=> Confirm the checkout (should work with and without this patch)
- Set AllowReturnToBranch to holdinbranch ("only the library the item
was checked out from").
- Check an item (homebranch Library 1, holding branch Library 1) out from Library 1
- Check the item out from Library 2
=> Without this patch, Koha crashed
=> With this patch, you will be warned that the checkin is not possible.
Try other combinations of the AllowReturnToBranch syspref
Followed test plan, works as expected
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
(cherry picked from commit 9427d44568)
Signed-off-by: Frédéric Demians <f.demians@tamil.fr>
If the limit for number of items checked out is reached, the message box
shows up but is empty.
Test Plan:
1) Disable AllowTooManyOverride
2) Check out items to a patron until the patron has reached the limit
of checkouts he or she can have
3) Try to check out one more item
4) Note the empty message box
5) Apply this patch
6) Try to check out one more item again
7) Note the message is now visible
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Legrand <nicolas.legrand@bulac.fr>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Brendan Gallagher <brendan@bywatersolutions.com>
(cherry picked from commit af43f91335)
Signed-off-by: Frédéric Demians <f.demians@tamil.fr>
Note that few other occurrences exist in DB.
This patch also replaces a tab with 4 spaces.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
It is best to test when UTC date is a date in the future compared
to your timezone. I'm in Eastern, so right now, I expect this
test to fail for another 2.5 hours.
TEST PLAN
---------
1) prove t/Circulation/AgeRestrictionMarkers.t
-- fails for PEGI 15 after 9pm.
2) Apply patch
3) prove t/Circulation/AgeRestrictionMarkers.t
-- works.
4) koha qa test tools
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch allows the high holds loan length decrease to be overridden
either by a checkbox that remembers its setting during a series of
checkouts, or by a one time use override checkbox that will show
in the warning popup if a checkout is affected by high holds.
Test Plan:
1) Set up a checkout that will be affected by decreaseLoanHighHolds
2) Attempt to check out an item
3) Check the override checkbox
4) Note the checkout date is not reduced
5) Return the item
6) Start a new checkout for the patron
7) Check the "Don't decrease lean length based on holds" checkbox
8) Check out the item
9) Note you are not warned about the high holds decrease
and that the checkout length is not reduced
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Christopher Brannon <cbrannon@cdalibrary.org>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
This enhancment allows a library to prevent patrons from checking out
items if his or her guarantees own too much.
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Find or create a patron with a guarantor
3) Add a fine to the patron's account
4) Set the new system preference NoIssuesChargeGuarantees to be less
than the amount owed by the patron
4) Attempt to check out an item to the guarantor, you will either
be warned or prevented from checking out based on your system
settings.
Signed-off-by: Cathi Wiggin <CWIGGINS@arcadiaca.gov>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Some libraries would like to be able to limit hold filling to items that
match the pickup library for a hold based on the item's home or holding
library. The patron's home library should not affect whether a patron
can place the hold, instead the hold will only be fillable when an item
matching the pickup location becomes available.
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Run updatedatabase.pl
3) Note the new "Hold pickup library match" rules for "checkout, hold,
and return policy" and for "holds policy by item type"
4) Set the policy to "item's holding library"
5) Place a hold where the item's holding branch does not match
the pickup branch
6) Check in the item
7) Note it is not trapped for the hold
8) Update the item's holding branch to match the pickup branch
8) Check in the item
9) Note the item is trapped for the hold
10) Repeat steps 4-9 but for home branch instead
Signed-off-by: Hector Castro <hector.hecaxmmx@gmail.com>
Works as described
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
GetLoanLength arbitrary defaulted to 21. The expected behavior seems to
be to default on 0 (loan will be dued today).
IMPORTANT NOTE: This patch will introduce a change in the behaviors for
configuration with a 0 in issuelength. Before this patch, the rule with
a issuelength==0 was skipped, now it's used!
Test plan:
1/ Do not define any rule: the due date will be today (before this patch
was +21 days)
2/ Define some rules which does not match the patron category, itemtype
or branchcode: the due date will be today (before this patch was +21
days).
3/ Modify a rule to match the checkout and set issuelength=0: the due
date will be today (before this patch, the rule was skipped)
4/ Modify this rule and set the issuelength to something > 0: the due
date will be adjusted (same behavior as before this patch)
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Works ok, checked 1-4
All test pass
No koha-qa errors
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Mainly a
perl -p -i -e 's/^.*3.07.00.049.*\n//' **/*.pm
Then some adjustements
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@unc.edu.ar>
Signed-off-by: Brendan A Gallagher <brendan@bywatersolutions.com>
perl -p -i -e 's/^(use vars .*)\$VERSION\s?(.*)/$1$2/' **/*.pm
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@unc.edu.ar>
Signed-off-by: Brendan A Gallagher <brendan@bywatersolutions.com>
This patch allows for more flexibility for determining when the number
of holds a record has should trigger the reduction of the loan length
for items on that record.
This patch adds a new system preference decreaseLoanHighHoldsControl,
which defaults to 'static', the original behavior of the feature.
It also has a new behavior 'dynamic' which makes the feature only
decrease the loan length if the number of holds on the record exceeds
the number of holdable items + decreaseLoanHighHoldsValue.
It also allows items to be filtered from the list of items based
on the damaged, lost, not for loan, and withdrawn values even if
those values would have allowed holds ( i.e. values < 0 )
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Run updatedatabase.pl
3) Set decreaseLoanHighHolds to Enable
4) Set decreaseLoanHighHoldsControl to "over the number of items on the record"
5) Set decreaseLoanHighHoldsDuration to 1
6) Set decreaseLoanHighHoldsValue to 3
7) Create a record with 5 items
8) Please 8 or more holds on the record
9) Check out one of the items to a patron
10) Note the loan length is reduced to 1 day
11) Set decreaseLoanHighHoldsValue to 3 to 2
12) Check out one of the items to a patron
13) Note the loan length is *not* reduced
14) Enbale all the filters possible in decreaseLoanHighHoldsIgnoreStatuses
15) Set one item to be damaged
16) Note the loan length is reduced
17) Unset the damaged status
18) Repeat steps 15 - 17 for lost, not for loan, and withdrawn
Signed-off-by: Christopher Brannon <cbrannon@cdalibrary.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Brendan A Gallagher <brendan@bywatersolutions.com>
The 'borrower' should not be used anymore, especially for new code.
This patch move files and rename variables newly pushed (i.e. in the Koha
namespace).
Test plan:
1/
git grep Koha::Borrower
should not return code in use.
2/
Prove the different modified test files
3/ Do some clicks in the member^Wpatron module to be sure there is not
an obvious error.
Signed-off-by: Hector Castro <hector.hecaxmmx@gmail.com>
Works as described. Tested with Circulation, Members/Patrons, Discharge,
Restrictions modules and the must common functionalities
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Weaver <jweaver@bywatersolutions.com>
Right now, fines are updated based on the fine description. There are a
number of areas where this can go wrong ( date or time format changing,
title being modified, etc ). Now that issues has a unique
identifier, we should use that for selection and updating of fines.
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Test creating and updating fines via fines.pl
and checking in overdue items. No changes should be noted.
3) prove t/db_dependent/Circulation.t
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Mirko Tietgen <mirko@abunchofthings.net>
Signed-off-by: Brendan Gallagher brendan@bywatersolutions.com
This patch updates the calculation of 'No renewal before' to include the
new syspref NoRenewalBeforePrecision.
To test:
1) Check out an hour-based loan with 'No renewal before' set to 1.
Switch syspref NoRenewalBeforePrecision between 'date' and 'exact
time'. Confirm that with both settings the item cannot be renewed
until exactly one hour before due.
2) Check out a day-based loan with 'No renewal before' set to 1 day.
Confirm that:
* with NoRenewalBeforePrecision set to 'date', renewal is possible
at 12:00 AM on the day before due.
* with NoRenewalBeforePrecision set to 'exact time', renewal is
possible at 11:59 PM on the day before due.
Sponsored-by: Hochschule für Gesundheit (hsg), Germany
Signed-off-by: Jesse Weaver <jweaver@bywatersolutions.com>
C4::Branch::GetBranchDetail retrieved library infos, it could be easily
replaced with Koha::Libraries->find
When this change needs other big changes, the unblessed method is
called, to manipulate a hashref (as before) instead of a Koha::Library
object (for instance when $library is sent to GetPreparedLetter).
Test plan:
1/ Print a basket group, the library names should be correctly
displayed.
2/ Enable emailLibrarianWhenHoldIsPlaced and place a hold, a HOLDPLACED
notice will be generated (focus on the library name)
3/ Edit a patron and change his/her library
4/ Generate the advanced notices (misc/cronjobs/advance_notices.pl) and
have a look at the generated notices
5/ Same of overdues notices
6/ Set IndependentBranches and use a non superlibrarian user to place a
hold. The "pickup at" should be correctly filled.
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Brendan Gallagher brendan@bywatersolutions.com
1; was not at the end of the module as it should be
to ensure compilation returns true
return it to last line of code where it should be
This patch fixes an ovious mistake.
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Brendan Gallagher brendan@bywatersolutions.com
Check in and check out were failing for me.
Specificly, the $borrower->{flags}->{...} was not accessible as
a hash, so I put a hash ref check around the code that would fail.
TEST PLAN
---------
1) Attempt a checkout
-- blows up with "1" not being allowed as a hash ref.
2) Apply patch
3) Attempt same checkout again
-- success
4) prove -v t/db_dependent/Circulation_dateexpiry.t
-- this triggers CanBookBeIssued
-- this should succeed
5) prove -v t/db_dependent/rollingloans.t
-- mine skipped the tests, but if configured, it
should also trigger and succeed.
6) run koha qa test tools
Signed-off-by: Mark Tompsett <mtompset@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Tompsett <mtompset@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Currently if the AnonymousPatron system preference is in use, all patron
data is anonymized. Some libraries would like to be able to see the last
patron who returned out an item ( in case of damage ) but still keep all
other patrons anonymized.
* Add the table items_last_borrower ( id, itemnumber, borrowernumber )
* Add new system preference StoreLastBorrower
* If StoreLastBorrower is enabled, upon checkin have Koha insert into
this table the patron who last returned this item. Replace existing
row based on itemnumber if exists.
* If table has a row for a given item, link to the patron from the item
details page.
Test plan:
1) Apply patch
2) Run updatedatabase.pl
3) Enable StoreLastBorrower
4) Issue an item to a patron and return said item
5) Issue the same item to a second patron, do not return it.
6) View moredetail.pl for the given bib, find the given item. There
should be a new field in the history list 'Last returned by' with a link
to the last patron to return the item.
Optionally, you can also verify this works even if patron issuing
history has been set to anonymize issues upon return.
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@quecheelibrary.org>
Signed-off-by: Jen DeMuth <JDeMuth@roseville.ca.us>
Signed-off-by: Tom Misilo <misilot@fit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Brendan Gallagher brendan@bywatersolutions.com
If no value for 'no renewal before' is specified, automatic renewal now
falls back on the due date. Also 'no renewal before' can now be zero, so
both automatic and manual renewals can be delayed until due date.
Test plan:
1) Create some circulation rules with different settings for 'No renewal
before' and 'Automatic renewal'. Both daily and hourly loans should
work.
2) Try to renew both manually and automatically before and after a renewal
should be possible. You can run misc/cronjobs/automatic_renewals.pl for
automatic renewal.
3) Confirm that:
* Both automatic and manual renewal with 'No renewal before' set
to 0 do not happen before the due date (exact DateTime).
* Manual renewal with 'No renewal before' set to undef (enter empty
string) is unrestricted.
* Automatic renewal with 'No renewal before' set to undef does not
happen before the due date.
Sponsored-by: Hochschule für Gesundheit (hsg), Germany
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
These 3 subroutines are not used anymore:
- CheckRepeatableHolidays
- CheckSpecialHolidays
- CheckRepeatableSpecialHolidays
Moreover we have subroutines in Koha::Calendar to do this job.
Test plan:
git grep CheckRepeatableHolidays
git grep CheckSpecialHolidays
git grep CheckRepeatableSpecialHolidays
should not return any results.
Signed-off-by: Hector Castro <hector.hecaxmmx@gmail.com>
Subroutines removed
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>