Bug 12079: ensure that CheckReserves() includes reserve_id in its response
This patch modifies _Findgroupreserve so that its one caller,
CheckReserves(), would include the reserve_id field in the
hold request it returns.
Failure to include reserve_id in every circumstance resulted
in bug 11947. This patch is therefore a complementary fix for
that bug, but is not meant to preempt the direct fix for
that bug.
To test:
[1] Verify that t/db_dependent/Reserves.t passes.
[2] Verify that the following test plan taken from
the patch for bug 11947 works for this patch
*without* applying the patch for 11947:
* have a few borrowers, say 4.
* have a biblio with a single item (you can scale this up, it should
work just the same.)
* issue the item to borrower A
* have borrowers B, C, and D place a hold on the item
* return the item, acknowledge that it'll be put aside for B.
* view the holds on the item.
Without the patch:
* the hold priorities in the UI end up being "waiting, 2, 1" when they
should be "waiting, 1, 2".
* in the database "reserves" table, they're really "0, 2, 3" when they
should be "0, 1, 2".
With the patch:
* the hold priorities in the UI end up being "waiting, 1, 2"
* in the database, they're "0, 1, 2"
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Work as described. No koha-qa errors. Test pass
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Galen Charlton <gmc@esilibrary.com>
(cherry picked from commit 695fdebdee)
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
(cherry picked from commit 71efba2304)
This commit is contained in:
parent
dfb3a62d42
commit
9ee1e66e66
|
|
@ -1804,7 +1804,8 @@ sub _Findgroupreserve {
|
|||
reserves.priority AS priority,
|
||||
reserves.timestamp AS timestamp,
|
||||
biblioitems.biblioitemnumber AS biblioitemnumber,
|
||||
reserves.itemnumber AS itemnumber
|
||||
reserves.itemnumber AS itemnumber,
|
||||
reserves.reserve_id AS reserve_id
|
||||
FROM reserves
|
||||
JOIN biblioitems USING (biblionumber)
|
||||
JOIN hold_fill_targets USING (biblionumber, borrowernumber)
|
||||
|
|
@ -1835,7 +1836,8 @@ sub _Findgroupreserve {
|
|||
reserves.priority AS priority,
|
||||
reserves.timestamp AS timestamp,
|
||||
reserveconstraints.biblioitemnumber AS biblioitemnumber,
|
||||
reserves.itemnumber AS itemnumber
|
||||
reserves.itemnumber AS itemnumber,
|
||||
reserves.reserve_id AS reserve_id
|
||||
FROM reserves
|
||||
LEFT JOIN reserveconstraints ON reserves.biblionumber = reserveconstraints.biblionumber
|
||||
WHERE reserves.biblionumber = ?
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -2,7 +2,8 @@
|
|||
|
||||
use Modern::Perl;
|
||||
|
||||
use Test::More tests => 8;
|
||||
use Test::More tests => 9;
|
||||
|
||||
use MARC::Record;
|
||||
|
||||
use C4::Branch;
|
||||
|
|
@ -72,6 +73,8 @@ my ($status, $reserve, $all_reserves) = CheckReserves($itemnumber, $barcode);
|
|||
|
||||
is($status, "Reserved", "CheckReserves Test 1");
|
||||
|
||||
ok(exists($reserve->{reserve_id}), 'CheckReserves() include reserve_id in its response');
|
||||
|
||||
($status, $reserve, $all_reserves) = CheckReserves($itemnumber);
|
||||
is($status, "Reserved", "CheckReserves Test 2");
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue